⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Nicole R Horak”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 1× · 126 F.4th 589
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3402 ___________________________ Designworks Homes, Inc.; Charles Lawrence James lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Columbia House of Brokers Realty, Inc., doing business as House of Brok
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-08-16 · Published · cited 11× · 9 F.4th 803
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3608 ___________________________ Designworks Homes, Inc.; Charles Lawrence James lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Columbia House of Brokers Realty, Inc., doing business as House of Broker
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 2391
[Cite as Boston Hts. v. Hudson, 2026-Ohio-2391.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) VILLAGE OF BOSTON HEIGHTS, et al. C.A. No. 31482 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CITY
State v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013-04-30 · Published · cited 1× · 164 N.H. 800; 64 A.3d 962
Lynn, J. Consistent with the law of most jurisdictions, New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E) permits the introduction of co-conspirators’ statements when made during the course of and in furtherance of a conspiracy. However, post-arrest statements of co-conspirators are not admissible under this rule.1 In this case, a substantial number of post-arrest co-conspirator statements were im
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-12-12 · Published · cited 20× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 671; 2012 WL 6189013; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175622
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (“Guaranteed Rate”) filed this suit against twenty-six individuals and entities (collectively “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants conspired to defraud Guaranteed Rate in connection with the sale of real estate at a condominium development in Chicago, Illinois, known as Vision on State (“the Deve
District Court, D. Alaska · 2005-09-12 · Published · cited 4× · 389 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2005 A.M.C. 2307; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37397; 2005 WL 2335310
389 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2005) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance OP01 0025, through Puget Sound Underwriters, Inc., Plaintiff, v. INLET FISHERIES, INC., an Alaska corporation; and Inlet Fish Producers, Inc., an Alaska corporation, Defendants. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., an Alaska corporation; and Inlet Fish Producers, Inc., an Alaska corporation, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Totem Agencies, Inc., a Wa