Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nicole M. Babcock”
KWAIZER, NICOLE M. v. SITARSKI, JOY M.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1188 CA 11-01088 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. NICOLE M. KWAIZER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V ORDER JOY M. SITARSKI, CARRIE L. SITARSKI, SENECA-BABCOCK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., BUFFALO PANTHER CHEERLEADERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND SENECA STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, DEFENDANT. D
Babcock v. Casey'spublic domain
08/31/2021 DA 20-0480 Case Number: DA 20-0480 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2021 MT 215 KYLE R. BABCOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CASEY’S MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Nicole Diana Johnson v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00446-CR Nicole Diana JOHNSEN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
Nicole Haberle v. Daniel Troxellpublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge Timothy Nixon was a troubled man. After stealing a firearm, he told his partner, Nicole Haberle, that he was going to commit suicide. When a police officer employed by the Borough of Nazareth learned of that threat, he did not wait for trained crisis support professionals but instead knocked on the door of the apartment where Nixon was located and announced his presence. Nixon immediately shot h
Nicole Cultrona v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.public domain
OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Nicole Cultrona filed suit against Nationwide Life Insurance Company (Nationwide), the Nationwide Death Benefit Plan (the Plan), the Nationwide Benefits Administrative Committee (the BAC), and StarLine Group (StarLine) following the denial of her claim for accidental-death benefits and her subsequent exhaustion o
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00040-CV ___________________________ TAMISHA NICOLE CAMPBELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF TAMATHA NANETTE WILLIAMS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, Appellant V. PAUL H. POMPA, M.D. AND
Eric Raye Rieger v. Ashley Nicole Ramseypublic domain
979-864-1316 I ll E. Locust, Suite. 500 979-388-1316 ADgletou, TX n515 281-756-1316 www.br:tzori:~~~ountt.t'om FILED IN RHONDABARCHAK 14th COURT OF APPEALS
05/21/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 11, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE EX REL. NICOLE LYTLE v. SENECA WEBB Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 06D-802 Philip E. Smith, Judge ___________________________________
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00040-CV ___________________________ TAMISHA NICOLE CAMPBELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF TAMATHA NANETTE WILLIAMS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, Appellant V. PAUL H. POMPA, M.D. AND
Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement Systempublic domain
ORDER AND OPINION J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge. Plaintiffs are retired members of a pension trust plan1 administered by the South Carolina Retirement Systems (“Retirement Systems”) who were rehired on or after July 1, 2005, by employers participating in the Retirement Systems. Plaintiffs bring this action, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, challenging
United States v. Puchalskipublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge. Through this qui tam action, Plaintiffs Andrew Battiata, M.D. (“Battiata”) and Jenny Raybon (“Raybon”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek recovery on behalf of the United States for alleged violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”). The matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motio
United States ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomeypublic domain
ORDER AND OPINION MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, Senior District Judge. On October 4, 2005, Plaintiff United States of America, ex rel. Michael K. Drakeford, M.D., filed a qui tarn complaint *780against Defendant Tuomey d/b/a Tuomey Healthcare System, Inc. The Government filed amended complaints on December 21, 2007 and November 12, 2008. The Government alle
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00286-CV Margaret Landen SAKS and Philip M. Ross, Appellants v. Marcus P. ROGERS, A. Chris Heinrichs, J. Barrett Shipp, and Heinrichs & De Gennaro, P.C.,
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. W. Distrib. Co.public domain
Babcock, District Judge. This matter is before me on Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's ("EEOC" or "Plaintiff") Motion for Bifurcation. ECF No. 136. The parties agree that bifurcation should occur, but disagree as to the scope. After considering the parties' arguments through briefing and a hearing that occurred on July 24, 2018, for the reasons below, I GRANT the Motion in part. I. BACKGROU
Matter of Adorno v. Vaillantpublic domain
Matter of Adorno v Vaillant (2019 NY Slip Op 08028) Matter of Adorno v Vaillant 2019 NY Slip Op 08028 Decided on November 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu
Benson v. Nelsonpublic domain
725 P.2d 71 (1986) Barrett E. BENSON and Patricia Ann Benson; Alan B. Nicol and Karen B. Nicol; Robert L. Hoerr and Jere L. Hoerr; James B. Turner and Mary Catherine Turner; Donald A. Anderson and Ruth L. Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ken NELSON, a/k/a Kenneth M. Nelson, Defendant-Appellee. No. 84CA0920. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. May 15, 1986.
Matter of Poromon v. Evanspublic domain
Matter of Poromon v Evans (2019 NY Slip Op 07205) Matter of Poromon v Evans 2019 NY Slip Op 07205 Decided on October 4, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan
Matter of Shakema R. v. Mesha B.public domain
Matter of Shakema R. v Mesha B. (2025 NY Slip Op 01512) Matter of Shakema R. v Mesha B. 2025 NY Slip Op 01512 Decided on March 14, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic
Kelly v. . Babcockpublic domain
When the plaintiff rested his case before the referee, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint "on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to show any property of defendants in the attachment suit in the hands of the defendants in this action." Motion denied and exception. Property was alleged in the complaint to be in their hands and it is nowhere denied in the answer. It is averred in the complaint that, "at the time of such service" (service of the attachment), "said de
Tharp v. Media General, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER TERRY L. WOOTEN, Chief Judge. This matter is now before the Court on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants, Media General, Inc.; Media General Operations, Inc. d/b/a WBTW CBS News 13 and the Morning News; Media General Communications Holdings, LLC d/b/a SCNOW.com; Mason Snyder, and Nicole Boone (collectively “Defendants”), on May 31, 2013. (Doc. #71). The Plaintiff, Louis C