Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Patricia Consolación Cruz Nicolas and Belem Alelhi Reymundo Nicolas, mother and daughter and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo ineffective assistance of counsel

MEMORANDUM ** Patricia Consolación Cruz Nicolas and Belem Alelhi Reymundo Nicolas, mother and daughter and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo ineffective assistance of counsel

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT Graffeo, J. Plaintiffs are judgment debtors whose bank accounts were “frozen” by judgment creditors in anticipation of enforcement of a money judgment pursuant to CPLR article 52. Plaintiffs allege that the restraints were invalid because their banks failed to comply with requirements imposed on financial institutions under the Exempt Income Protection Act of 2008 (EIPA). That legislatio

Nicola v Nicolas (2022 NY Slip Op 05041) Nicola v Nicolas 2022 NY Slip Op 05041 Decided on August 24, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

PER CURIAM: Carlos A. Fuentes-Cruz (“Fuentes-Cruz”) seeks review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his cancellation of removal application. We agree with the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) and the BIA that Fuentes-Cruz’s conviction of the Texas offense of Unlawful Transport under Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20.05 is a crime involving moral turpitude. We therefo

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff-Appellant Vincent Van Ness, an inmate incarcerated with the New York Department of Corrections, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against corrections officers Anthony Lorenzo and Eddie Cruz, alleging that the officers violated his constitutional

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Sucesión José A. Toro Morales, et al Certiorari Demandantes-Peticionarios 2004 TSPR 41 v. 161 DPR ____ Sucesión de Nicolás Toro Cruz, et al Demandados-Recurridos Número del Caso: CC-2002-714 Fecha: 17 de marzo de 2004 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones:

OPINION FACTS This is an appeal, pursuant to 1 CMC §§ 3102 and 9113, from a trial court decision affirming the actions of the Civil Service Commission (hereafter CSC) and the Department of Public Safety (hereafter DPS) with respect to the termination of employment of appellant, Dolores San Nicolas (hereafter San Nicolas), a civil service employee. San Nicolas was a DPS employee for several years pri

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 6, 2019 No. 04-19-00756-CR Teanna Danielle SAN NICOLAS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2020 No. 04-19-00756-CR Teanna Danielle SAN NICOLAS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 20, 2019 No. 04-19-00756-CR Teanna Danielle SAN NICOLAS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 26, 2020 No. 04-19-00756-CR Teanna Danielle SAN NICOLAS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Opinion MOORE, Acting P. J. —A jury found defendant Jorene Ypanto Nicolas guilty of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence. Essentially, defendant was on her phone and texting while driving on the freeway. The deceased victim had been in her car, stalled in a traffic jam. Defendant crashed into the rear of the victim’s car at about 80 miles pe

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V RAFAEL RIVERA APELACIÓN CLAUDIO; NILDA IRIS procedente del GONZÁLEZ RIVERA y Tribunal de Primera SLBG COMPUESTA Instancia, Sala POR AMNBOS Superior de Apela

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. CRUZ NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

44 Cal.3d 1247 (1988) 752 P.2d 439 246 Cal. Rptr. 1 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANK A. CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. Crim. 26142. Supreme Court of California. April 21, 1988. *1248 COUNSEL Thomas T. Ono, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for D

Filed 4/28/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160334 v. CRISTIAN CRUZ-PARTIDA, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 16-NF-004951A) Defendant and Appellan

Filed 5/26/22 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, A160334 Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Mateo County v. Super. Ct. No. 16-NF-004951A) CRISTI

830 So.2d 892 (2002) Nicolas CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D01-938. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 13, 2002. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant