Cases

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. William Carter sued employees of the Missouri Department- of Mental Health (“DMH”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Carter alleged that these defendants violated his Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights by forcibly collecting his fingerprints, a mouth swab, and a blood sample while he was confined at Fulton Hospital as a civilly committed sexually viol

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judge Humphreys and Senior Judge Annunziata PUBLISHED Argued by videoconference NICHOLAS LEE THOMAS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0176-20-2 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS

394 P.2d 452 (1964) AKERS AUTO SALVAGE and the State Insurance Fund, Petitioners, v. Don WADDLE and the State Industrial Court of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents. No. 40549. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 21, 1964. Mont R. Powell, Fred Nicholas, Jr., Oklahoma City, for petitioners. Richard J. Spooner and Harley E. Venters, Oklahoma City, for respondents.<

LaROSE, Chief Judge. Stella Partridge, also known as Stella Gomez Seitz (“Ms. Seitz”), appeals a final judgment of foreclosure. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). Ms. Seitz, who unsuccessfully moved for involuntary dismissal at trial, argues that the trial court erred in admitting the payment history into evidence. She also contends that Nationstar Mortgag

PER CURIAM. We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and- that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lu

LEIBSON, Justice. Appellant, Nicholas Baker, is an attorney who asserts that he is entitled to a statutory fee from Motorist Insurance Companies (“Motorist”) under KRS 304.39-070(5), a part of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act (MVRA). It provides: “An attorney representing a secured person in any action filed under KRS 304.-39-060 shall be entitled to a reasonable attorneys’ fee in the event that

Calderoni v 260 Park Ave. S. Condominium (2023 NY Slip Op 05357) Calderoni v 260 Park Ave. S. Condominium 2023 NY Slip Op 05357 Decided on October 24, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Calderoni v 260 Park Ave. S. Condominium (2023 NY Slip Op 05357) Calderoni v 260 Park Ave. S. Condominium 2023 NY Slip Op 05357 Decided on October 24, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

NO. 12-22-00193-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF VASSIL § APPEAL FROM THE V. TCHOKOEV, AN INCAPACITATED § COUNTY COURT AT LAW PERSON § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

LAGOA, J. Serge Jean (“Jean”) appeals from convictions and sentences for escape, felony possession of methamphetamine and cocaine, and misdemeanor possession of marijuana. Because the trial court abused its discretion in limiting defense counsel's closing argument, we reverse the convictions, vacate the sentences and remand for a new trial. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Th

223 Pa. Superior Ct. 15 (1972) Commonwealth v. Shapiro, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted September 11, 1972. November 16, 1972. *16 Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, CERCONE, and PACKEL, JJ. Arthur L. Jenkins, Jr. and Smith, Aker, Grossman, Hollinger and Jenkins, fo

Mason-Mahon v Flint (2018 NY Slip Op 07716) Mason-Mahon v Flint 2018 NY Slip Op 07716 Decided on November 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

CLARIA HORN BOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 23] and the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine [R. 28]. On May 31, 2017, Plaintiff Shannon Tuttle filed this lawsuit, bringing claims for violation of the Americans with *625Disability Act (ADA), violation of the Ken

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Before the Court are three Motions: Defendant Emas Subsea Services, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (“Emas Subsea’s Motion”) (Doc. No. 5); Defendants Ezra Holdings Limited, Ezra Energy Services PTE Ltd., and Emas Offshore Limited’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and, Alternatively, on the Basis of Forum Non Co

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED November 8, 2023 RONALD HARDY, ET AL., EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Plaintiffs Below, Petitioners INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

394 P.2d 511 (1964) Don WADDLE, Petitioner, v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT of the State of Oklahoma, Akers Auto Salvage and State Insurance Fund, Respondents. No. 40748. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 14, 1964. Richard J. Spooner and Harley E. Venters, Oklahoma City, for petitioner. Mont R. Powell and Fred Nicholas, Jr., Oklahoma City, for respondents.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 11, 2016 Session DEMENT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC v. LUCAS C. NEMETH, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 63359 J. Mark Rogers, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-02204-COA-R3-CV – Filed December 20, 2016 ___

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. On October 14, 2011, Plaintiff brought suit against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged deprivations of her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Housing Choice Voucher Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. A bench trial was held on March 4 and March 7, 2013. The Court has carefully considered the parties

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED JAMES GOODWIN, JOHN INGRAM, December 23, 2024 RAYMOND LOVEJOY, JEFFREY ALLEN, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK CHARLES LILLY, and RAYMOND MUNCY, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

*271 OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. In this shareholder class action challenging a going-private merger, we adopt the standard of review recently announced by the Delaware Supreme Court in Kahn v M & F Worldwide Corp. (88 A3d 635, 644-645 [Del 2014] [