Cases

The Defendant's Affirmative Defense fails on a number of levels.7 Statutes of limitation do not have the legal effect supposed by the Defendant. They do not negate parties' rights, but rather deny legal recourse on such rights in very specific circumstances. Further, even if a statute of limitations has run on a security agreement or mortgage, under Illinois law, those instruments remain good and enforceable so long as the under

PER CURIAM. Anthony Robert Martin-Trigona (Trígona) appeals from the order of the district court finding him to be a recalcitrant witness. 1 Pursuant to that order he has been confined to the Metropolitan Correctional Center until he answers certain questions. Trigona’s two applications for bail pending appeal have been

449 U.S. 1025 101 S.Ct. 593 66 L.Ed.2d 486 Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, petitioner,v.Nicholas GOULETAS et al No. 80- 5463 Supreme Court of the United States December 1, 1980 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh

15 B.R. 645 (1980) Anthony Robert MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. Nicholas GOULETAS, et al., Defendants-Counterplaintiffs. Bankruptcy No. 76 C 4383. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. December 22, 1980. Jeffrey Schulman, Chicago, Ill., for movant. Betty J. Mallow, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Champaign County, Ill., 6th Judicial

524 F.Supp. 10 (1980) Anthony Robert MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. Nicholas GOULETAS, et al.,[*] Defendants-Counterplaintiffs. No. 76 C 4383. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. December 22, 1980. *11 Jeffrey Schulman, Chicago, Ill., for movant. Betty J. Mallow, Clerk of the Circ

105 Ill. App.3d 28 (1982) 433 N.E.2d 1132 ANTHONY R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NICHOLAS GOULETAS et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-2300. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed March 23, 1982. *29 D.L. Bertelle, of Chicago, for appellant. William E. R

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court 800 South Wells Commercial, LLC v. Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered, 2013 IL App (1st) 123660 Appellate Court 800 SOUTH WELLS COMMERCIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption HORWOOD MARCUS AND BERK CHARTERED, Defendant- Appellee (Nicholas S. Gouletas; 800 South Wells Phase I, LLC, a/k

Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant James Paul [30] is granted; the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant George Strat [46] is denied; the motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, the motion for a more definite statement filed by Defendant Paul Jones [61] is granted in part and denied in part; the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Natel Matschu

Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment [56] filed by Defendants *413Steven Gouletas, Irene Gouletas, Desiree Witte, Victoria Gouletas, Rosalie Gouletas, Louis Gouletas, and Brittany Gouletas (the "Garvey Court Defendants")

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss and Denying Request for Hearing1 ANDREW P. GORDON, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Koval Flamingo, LLC (“Koval”) filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 64), which was joined by American Invsco *1147Corporation (“Invsco”), Condominium Rental Services

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

This is a consolidated, interlocutory appeal brought by plaintiff Board of Directors of the Gold Coast Galleria Condominium Association and plaintiff Board of Managers of Eleventh Street Loftominium Association from trial court orders disqualifying their attorney, the Chicago law firm of Arnstein Lehr LLP (Arnstein). The first plaintiffs lawsuit concerns a Chicago residential building located at 111 West Maple Street which was converted into 331 residential condominium units in

First Division August 27, 2007 1-06-0104 and 1-06-1179, consolidated BOARD OF MANAGERS OF ELEVENTH STREET ) LOFTOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v.

THIRD DIVISION March 14, 2007 1-06-0254 TOWER INVESTORS, LLC, an Illinois Corporation, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court Plaintiff-Appellee, ) of Cook County.

864 N.E.2d 927 (2007) TOWER INVESTORS, LLC, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 111 EAST CHESTNUT CONSULTANTS, INC., an Illinois Corporation, and Invsco Group, Ltd., an Illinois Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-06-0254. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. March 14, 2007. Rehearing Denied April 9, 2007. <

906 N.E.2d 599 (2009) John PRODROMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVEREN SECURITIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Principal Financial Securities, a dissolved Delaware Corporation, and Daniel L. Westrope, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-06-3685. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. March 20, 2009. *601 George B. C

573 F.Supp. 1237 (1983) In re Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA. Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff, v. Harold LAVIEN, Robert Krechevsky, Alan Shiff, Alan Nevas, Irving Perlmutter, Daniel Meister, Richard Belford, Richard Coan, Jon Schneider, Thomas Urmy, United States District Court, Defendants. Misc. Civ. No. H 83-62. Civ. No. H 83-305. United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge. This case presents yet another chapter in the long-running story of perhaps the most prolific litigator in this circuit’s history, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, whose trials and tribulations have been well documented by this and other courts. For a sample of Martin-Trigona’s multi-faceted litigation career, we refer the uninitiated reader to,

737 F.2d 1254 In re Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA.Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona.Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Harold LAVIEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.William F. SMITH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 577, Docket 83-7534. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. A

573 F.Supp. 1245 (1983) In re Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA. Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA v. Harold LAVIEN et al. Anthony R. MARTIN-TRIGONA v. William French SMITH et al. Misc. Civ. No. H 83-62. Civ. Nos. H 83-305, H 83-322. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 26, 1983. *1246 Anthony R. Martin-Trigona