Cases

373 F.Supp.2d 608 (2005) Shirley JUSTUS, Plaintiff, v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:05CV00029. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. June 17, 2005. *609 S.T. Mullins, Street Law Firm LLP, Grundy, VA, for Plaintiff. Robert S. Ballou, Johnson Ayers & Matthew

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0180p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NICHOLAS SANDMANN, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Robert Angleton was acquitted, in state court, of the murder of his wife. A federal grand jury then indicted him for the same murder. Angleton appeals, on grounds of double jeopardy, the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. Concluding that the dual sovereignty doctrine permits a successive prosecution, we affirm.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0071p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NICHOLAS K. MERIWETHER, │

WALLACE, Judge, Concurring in part and dissenting in part. During the voir dire examination at Nicholas’ trial, no one asked the members of the venire if they knew Nicholas or any of the prospective witnesses. The majority holds that one of the members of Nicholas’ jury committed misconduct by failing to volunteer that he was acquainted with Tamiko James and Nicholas. But a ju

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judge Humphreys and Senior Judge Annunziata PUBLISHED Argued by videoconference NICHOLAS LEE THOMAS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0176-20-2 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS

Case: 19-1683 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 09/01/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee ______________________ 2019-1683 ______________________ Appeal from the Armed Se

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2121 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2121 FIRST KUWAITI GENERAL TRADING & CONTRACTING W.L.L., Movant - Appellant, v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,

ACCEPTED 14-13-00824-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/23/2015 4:29:17 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________________ No. 23-2084 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT HAGGERTY, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0180 Submitted September 17, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 Amended August 31, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. NICHOLAS DEAN WRIGHT, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Adam D. Sauer, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0180 Submitted September 17, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. NICHOLAS DEAN WRIGHT, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Adam D. Sauer, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on the warrantless seizure of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT H. ODELL, JR.; ROBERT No. 19-15262 ODELL, M.D., PH.D. MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, A Nevada D.C. No. Corporation, 2:15-cv-01793- Plaintiffs-Appellees, RFB-GWF v. OPINION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; XAVIER BECERRA, Defendants-Appel

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0180 Submitted September 17, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. NICHOLAS DEAN WRIGHT, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Adam D. Sauer, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on the warrantless seizure of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1210 Filed April 30, 2014 NICHOLAS W. O’BRIEN, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. ELIZABETH WYGLE, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Howard County, Richard D. Stochl, Judge. An unmarried father appeals the physical care and visitation provisions of a custody decr

800 F.Supp.2d 143 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. 10-cv-530 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 3, 2011. *146 Brian P. Hudak, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Stanley E. Alderson, Stanley Earl Alderson, II, U.S

LYNCH, District Judge, concurring. I fully join in Chief Judge Walker’s thorough opinion for the court. Though reluc*678tant to burden the record with still more writing, I add just a few words.' The genius of the common-law system of adjudication is that the decisions of courts constitute precedent, not the opinions by which co

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Henry T. NICHOLAS, III and William J. Ruehle et al., Defendants. Case No. SACR 08-00139 CJC. United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. December 29, 2008. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS PRIVILEGED EMAIL AND GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S APPLICATION TO DISCLOSE PRIVILEGED EMAIL CORMAC

430 F.3d 652 Jason B. NICHOLAS, John Lewis, Philip Rabenbauer, Frank Solimine, Robert Pacini, Chester Flanders, Bennie Bates, Lymond Stephenson, Luis Mejia, Cecil Barrow, Dominic Deruggiero, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Alvaro Sanchez, Plaintiff,v.Glenn S. GOORD, New York State Department of Correctional Services; Katherine Lapp, New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services; Medilabs, Inc.; Jessica Walsh, Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–1009 Submitted September 14, 2023—Filed December 1, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. ROBERT CLARK GEDDES, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, Stephen A. Owen, District Associate Judge. The defendant appeals his convictions for trespass as a hate crime, arguing that the evidence of guilt was insufficient and that the convictions