Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Nicholas Richard Saladino”
In re Nicholas E.public domain
Filed 5/7/15 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO In re NICHOLAS E. et al., Persons Coming B256182 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. DK02119) LOS ANGELES
Opinion HOFFSTADT, J. The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) filed a petition in juvenile dependency court alleging that four minors were at risk of physical harm and emotional damage due to their mother’s conduct. Mother moved to dismiss the petition because she and father are already litigating the custody of-the kids
Michael Jay Goldstein v. Richard Allen Diamondpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-6002 ___________________________ In re: Richard Allen Diamond llDebtor ------------------------------ Michael Jay Goldstein lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff – Appellant and Michael Fitzgerald Plaintiff
Goldstein v. Diamond (In re Diamond)public domain
KRESSEL, Bankruptcy Judge. Michael Jay Goldstein appeals from an order of the bankruptcy court1 determining that the debtor’s debt to him was not excepted from the debtor’s discharge and dismissing his complaint to determine dis-chargeability of his debt. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. BACKGROUND On November 29, 2011, Richard Allen Diamond filed a cha
Filed 8/29/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ) ) S214855 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/1 B237153 COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, ) ) Los Angeles County
Jose Alier v. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc.public domain
979 F.2d 946 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2857, 123 Lab.Cas. P 10,474 Jose ALIER, Joseph Arena, Bruce Barnwell, Edward Baronowski,Michael J. LoBascio, George J. Bauer, Domenico Berardesca,Robert Bertone, Jonathan Blum, William Boehmer, Vito DiBono,Edward Bottjer, Robert Brice, Charles Brown, EdwardBuchalski, Charles Campo, Anthony Carbone, Arnold Carlin,Edward P. Casale, Richard Charnow, John Clifford, Frank<
Rucho v. Common Causepublic domain
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2491 Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland challenged their States' congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The North Carolina plaintiffs complained that the State's distric
Alier v. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: Defendants Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc. (“Tuscan”), and Local 584, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“Local 584” or the “Union”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a bench trial before Michael B. Mukasey, Judge, ordering them, jointly and severally, principally to pay plaintiff Union members Jose Alier, et al, a total
United States v. Rahimipublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 680–778 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.public domain
891 F.Supp. 839 (1994) Thomas ALGIE, Anthony Amelio, Wallace Carnegie, Joseph A. Coppola, William Crouch, George Eccleston, Edward Edelson, Joseph Fezza, Joseph Gleitman, Jack Gold, Henrietta Greco, Calvin Gum, Dean Heunisches, Vincent Ingoglia, James Patrick, Carl Reddo, Pedro Richards, Stephen G. Safka, Jr., John H. Sharp, Eugene Stanley, Mark Stein, George Tropiano, and Aristedes Zagorianos, Plaintiffs, v. RCA GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and M
U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thorntonpublic domain
Justice Thomas, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Scalia join, dissenting. It is ironic that the Court bases today’s decision on the right of the people to “choose whom they please to govern them.” See ante, at 783, 793, 795, 819. Under our Constitution, there is only one State whose people have the right to “choose whom they please” to represent Arkan
Whether the Second Amendment Secures an Individual Right The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of states or a right restricted to persons serving in militias. August 24, 2004 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL I. The Unsettled Legal Landscape ............................