Cases

Schindler, J. ¶1 — To convict a person of animal cruelty in the first degree, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that acting with criminal negligence, the defendant starves, dehydrates, or suffocates an animal resulting in substantial and unjustifiable physical pain extending over a period of time sufficient to cause considerable suffering or death. Mary Dawn Peterson appeals her conviction of six counts of animal cru

[Cite as Peterson v. Amigo Mobility Internatl., Inc., 2013-Ohio-3933.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY DELLA MAE PETERSON : Appellate Case No. 25604 : Plaintiff-Appellant : Trial Court Case No. 2012-CV-1891

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiffs are sports photographers who accuse defendants, mostly sports memorabilia dealers, of making and selling unauthorized reproductions of their work. Some defendants have business insurance policies that may cover “advertising injury,” so those defendants tendered this case to their insurers, who intervened to contest coverage. Three of thos

Peterson, Justice. *362These companion appeals raise questions about when a jury considering a medical malpractice case might also be instructed on issues of ordinary negligence. Sterling Brown Sr. sued the defendants individually and on behalf of his wife, Gwendolyn Lynette Brown, after she suffered catastrophic brain damage, allegedly from

451 So.2d 216 (1984) Ronald A. PETERSON, Sheriff of Hancock County and Jerry D. Heitzmann, Circuit Clerk of Hancock County, Mississippi v. Sidney A. SANDOZ. No. 54191. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 30, 1984. *217 Lucien M. Gex, Jr., Gex & Adams, Waveland, for appellants. Nicholas M. Haas, Bay St. Louis, for appelle

BROWN, Judge, dissenting. I. Introduction I respectfully dissent. Today’s majority opinion misinterprets neutral principles of law as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. Wolf, 443 U. S. 595 (99 SC 3020, 61 LE2d 775) (1979). The majority also reaches an unjust result that is contrary to law in many ways. The Jones Court envisioned neutral

432 A.2d 752 (1981) Wilbur V. COLE et ux. v. PETERSON REALTY, INC., et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 12, 1981. Decided July 15, 1981. *753 Thompson, Willard & McNaboe, Nicholas Bull (orally), Portland, for plaintiffs. George F. Burns, Portland, for defendants. Christopher Nyhan (orally), Thomas

WOOD, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the latest phase of the long-running litigation over racial discrimination in public housing in Chicago that bears Dorothy Gautreaux’s name. See Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth. (CHA), 296 F.Supp. 907 (N.D.Ill.1969) (Gautreaux I) (finding the CHA liable for racial discrimination in site-selection

Peterson, Justice. Margarita Jean Leanos appeals her convictions for felony murder and other crimes in connection with the killing of a taxi driver, Isaias Tovar-Murillo.1 Leanos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict her. She also argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) notice that Leanos had been medicated into incompetence, (2) present a cohesiv

523 F.Supp.2d 577 (2007) WESTLAKE VINYLS, INC., Plaintiff v. GOODRICH CORPORATION, Defendant; Third Party Plaintiff v. Polyone Corporation, Third Party Defendant. No. 5:03CV-240-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Paducah Division. September 27, 2007. *578 *579 Adam T. Goeb

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 25-0053 Filed December 3, 2025 RYAN MOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. QUAD-CITY HOCKEY ASSOCIATION, MICHELLE ARNDT, ANNE GANNON, ZACH HONERT, TOM PETERSON, TODD MAHONEY, DARREN MCMILLAN, AMY ROTERT, JAKE TOPOROWSKI and MELODY WRIGHT, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Ericsson”) (Dkt. No. 81, filed on August 14, 2015),1 the response of TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., TCT Mobile Limited, and TCT Mobile (US), Inc. (collecti

518 F.Supp.2d 947 (2007) WESTLAKE VINYLS, INC., Plaintiff v. GOODRICH CORPORATION, Defendant; Third Party Plaintiff v. Polyone Corporation, Third Party Defendant. No. 5:03CV-0240-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Paducah Division. September 27, 2007. *948 Adam T. Goebel, Samuel D. Hinkle, IV, Stoll Keenon Og

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 03-MAY-2016 05:04 PM NO. SCMF-12-0000538

Berger, J. This case is before us on appeal from a jury verdict of the Circuit Court for Calvert County in a personal injury action brought by Adam Rutkowski and Sara Mastropole, appellees, husband and wife. Adam Rutkowski was injured on November 11, 2012, when a safety guardrail in his home failed, causing him to fall twelve to thirt

OPINION BOLGER, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Under the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity, an Indian tribe is immune from suit unless ■ Congress has' authorized the suit or the tribe has waived its immunity. Relying on this doctrine, the superior court dismissed a complaint by Douglas Indian Association against Central Council

638 F.Supp.2d 508 (2009) DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AW-09-824. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. July 29, 2009. David Eric Markert, David B. Weinberg, Eric Andreas, P. Nicholas Peterson, Wiley Rein LLP, Deborah Brand Baum, David E. Menotti, Pillsbury

154 B.R. 72 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ACME SOLVENTS RECLAIMING, INC., James B. Day and Company, Barrett Varnish Company, Sheboygan Paint Company, Rockford Coatings Corp., D.C. Franche and Company, Jasper Frank Pumilia and Nicholas J. Pumilia, Defendants. No. 89 C 7748. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. April 8, 1993.

[Cite as State v. Woodruff, 2024-Ohio-4926.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2024-CA-11 : v.

FILED Aug 25, 2025 01:55 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION