⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Nguyen v. Macy's, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL UNION OF No. 23-124 OPERATING ENGINEERS, NLRB No. STATIONARY ENGINEERS, 20-CA-270047 LOCAL 39, OPINION Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, ---------------------------------
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL UNION OF No. 23-124 OPERATING ENGINEERS, NLRB No. STATIONARY ENGINEERS, 20-CA-270047 LOCAL 39, ORDER AND Petitioner, AMENDED v. OPINION NATIONAL LABOR RELAT
District Court, E.D. New York · 2007-08-28 · Published · cited 2× · 506 F. Supp. 2d 156; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63543; 2007 WL 2421826
506 F.Supp.2d 156 (2007) Carla MANIGAULT, Plaintiff, v. MACY'S EAST, LLC, and Terry Whittaker, Defendants. No. CV-06-3337 (FB)(CLP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 28, 2007. *157 Saul D. Zabell, Esq., Zabell & Associates, P.C., Bohemia, NY, for the Plaintiff. Allison K. Romantz, Esq., Ronald S. All
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 6× · 206 So. 3d 77; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12135
JAY, J. We have for review the trial court’s final order dismissing with prejudice Appellant’s amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and granting Ap-pellees’ motion to compel arbitration. The issue presented is whether an arbitration clause contained in a bulk mailer sent out in 2012 by Appellees to its customers applied retroactively to a business transactio
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-06-26 · Published · cited 36× · 263 F. Supp. 3d 454
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The defendant, Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”), is a transportation company that connects consumers to drivers through its mobile application (the “Lyft App”). The plaintiff, Josh Applebaum, on behalf of a purported class alleges that Lyft overcharges its New York City metropolitan area consumers by charging them the non-discounted cash
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012-03-15 · Published · cited 56× · 672 F.3d 1350; 102 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1161; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5567; 2012 WL 858700
Opinion for the court in part filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE, in which Chief Judge RADER and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST join in full, and in which Circuit Judge LINN joins in part II. Opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, dissenting in part, in which Circuit Judges GAJARSA, REYNA, and WALLACH join in full, and in which Circuit Judge LINN joins in parts I — II. LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2015-03-23 · Published · cited 51× · 93 F. Supp. 3d 95; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35895; 2015 WL 1298632
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiff Justin T. Bassett filed a complaint on July 24, 2013, against Defendant Electronic Arts, Inc. (“EA”), seeking to certify a nationwide class and a New York sub-class of similarly-situated individuals who purchased certain video games manufactured, advertised, and sold by EA. Plaintiff alleges that EA mislead consumers as to the ab
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011-12-15 · Published · cited 297× · 663 F.3d 806; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24797; 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,369; 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 90; 2011 WL 6224548
663 F.3d 806 (2011) Regina PROVENZANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LCI HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-1639. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 4, 2011. Decided and Filed: December 15, 2011. *809 ARGUED: Russell C. Babcock, the Mastromarco Firm, Saginaw, Michigan, for Appellant.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009-07-30 · Published · cited 1× · 655 F. Supp. 2d 756; 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 905; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65934; 2009 WL 2422205
655 F.Supp.2d 756 (2009) Joseph THOMAS, Plaintiff v. MECHANICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 4:07CV-143-M. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Owensboro Division. July 30, 2009. *759 Andrew Dutkanych, III, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff. Andrew J. Manion, Tony W. Fehrenbacher, Kinney Kasha & B
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00307-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/23/2015 4:35:06 PM
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006-03-08 · Published · cited 3× · 420 F. Supp. 2d 773; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9580; 2006 WL 626401
420 F.Supp.2d 773 (2006) Malcolm T. TURNER, Administrator of the Estate of Susanne R. Turner Plaintiff v. THE SULLIVAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant No. Civ.A. 3:04CV-204-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. March 8, 2006. *774 *775
California Supreme Court · 2005-08-11 · Published · cited 848× · 116 P.3d 1123; 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 436; 36 Cal. 4th 1028; 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9664; 2005 Cal. LEXIS 8594; 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,041; 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 601
Opinion GEORGE, C. J. Plaintiff Elysa J. Yanowitz was a regional sales manager employed by defendant L’Oreal USA, Inc. (L’Oreal), a prominent cosmetics and fragrance company. Yanowitz alleges that after she refused to carry out an order from a male supervisor to terminate the employment of a female sales associate who, in the supervisor’s view, was not sufficie
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 160 F. Supp. 3d 1060; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13187; 2016 WL 427565
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiffs brought this action, seeking to enjoin Defendants from proceeding with *1062the construction of a museum on land that is adjacent to Lake Michigan. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which was denied in part and granted in part on March 1
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued January 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00326-CV ——————————— EVA CASAS, Appellant V. CASTANO ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A CUBE INVESTME
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed December 21, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-16-00346-CV __________ SOUTHSIDE PARTNERS, Appellant V. COLLAZO ENTERPRISES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 35th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2025-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00154-CV __________________ NELL A. BUSTAMANTE, Appellant V. MOAK DEVELOPMENTS, LLC D/B/A SERVICEMASTER BY CENTURY, SERVICEMASTER CLEAN/RESTORE SPE LLC, SERVI
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-10-24 · Published · cited 240× · 840 F.3d 292; 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1808; 2016 FED App. 0261N; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19106; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,664; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1145; 2016 WL 6156315
OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. William Tennial is an African-American employee of United Parcel ■ Service, Inc. (UPS) who has served in various managerial roles over the course of more than 30 years with the company. After a number of service failures that occurred during his time as Hub Manager of the Memphis Hub’s “Twilight Sort,” Tennial wa
District Court, S.D. California · 2016-02-25 · Published · cited 17× · 165 F. Supp. 3d 937; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24028; 2016 WL 739796
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT OBESITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (ECF No. 43) Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge On March 16, 2015, Obesity Research Institute, LLC (“Obesity Research”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Fiber Research International, LLC (“Fiber
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 28, 2021. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00504-CV ——————————— MARK BROWN, Appellant V. WILLIAM MCCLURE, ECCL 4:12, LLC, AND NEXTGEN PARKING,