Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Newman v. All Towne Realty”
Newman v. Howard University School of Lawpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-0436 (TNM) HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Howard University School of Law expelled Michael Newman. It claims that it did so because he repeated
Newman v. Howard University School of Lawpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-0436 (TNM) HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Michael Newman is a white former student of Howard University School of Law. He alleges tha
Newman v. Krintzmanpublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Overview Dealing with a doctrine like claim preclusion (the modern name for res judicata) can sometimes be difficult. But difficult is not impossible, even for today’s issue (which, by the way, reads like something lifted from a law-school exam): Does a judgment dismissing a case as time-barred under New York
October 14, 2022 Supreme Court No. 2020-168-M.P. (WC 11-615) No. 2020-169-M.P. (WC 11-616) Champlin’s Realty Associates : v. :
Newman v. Planning & Zoning Commissionpublic domain
976 A.2d 698 (2009) 293 Conn. 209 William J. NEWMAN et al. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF The TOWN OF AVON et al. Nos. 18106, 18107. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued February 18, 2009. Decided August 25, 2009. *699 Michael S. Taylor, with whom were Daniel Jonah Krisch, Hartford,
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC v. Alessandro Roberto (A-29-23) (088959) Argued September 23, 2024 -- Decided January 9, 2025 RABNER, C.J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court co
Castellano v. Access Premier Realty, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR„ CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs LaVonna Castellano and Project Sentinel, Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege violations of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) by defendants Access Premier Realty, Inc. and its representativés (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiffs bring the present Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) seeking summ
Perez v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Antonio Velazquez Perez (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Developers Diversified Realty Corp. and DDR PR Ventures II LLC (“DDR” or “Defendants”), *159alleging sexual harassment1 and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.public domain
*557Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered June 27, 2007, after a jury verdict and stipulated reduction, apportioning fault 75% against defendant 601 Realty Corp. and 25% against defendant Jeffrey Farkas, and awarding plaintiffs $4,235,464.76, modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, that portion of the judgment imposing personal liabil
Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoianpublic domain
DECISION "Fairness is what justice really is." -Justice Potter Stewart1 These consolidated administrative appeals are before the Court for decisions. Champlin's Realty Associates ("Champlin's," "Applicant," or "Plaintiff") brings the appeal in PC-06-1659 challenging the denial of its application to Coastal Resources Management Council ("CRMC") to expand its marina.
Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCpublic domain
684 S.E.2d 709 (2009) Louise Pack METCALF, Barbara Pack Holcombe, Michael Lawrence, Barbara Pack White, and Alice White Mobidine, Plaintiffs, v. BLACK DOG REALTY, LLC and Buncombe County, North Carolina, Defendants. No. COA08-1561. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 3, 2009. *711 Ferikes and Bleynat, PLLC, by Joseph A.
Newman v. Hollandpublic domain
Mercure, J. Appeals (1) from two orders of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered July 5, 1990 and December 3, 1990 in Ulster County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion to set aside an open-court stipulation between the parties, and (2) from an order of said court, entered November 13, 1990 in Ulster County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for renewal. Plaintiff and defendants are the owners
Matter of Prometheus Realty Corp. v New York City Water Bd. (2017 NY Slip Op 01263) Matter of Prometheus Realty Corp. v New York City Water Bd. 2017 NY Slip Op 01263 Decided on February 16, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department
McInerney v. Pinehurst Area Realty, Inc.public domain
GEER, Judge. Plaintiff homeowners James L. Mclnemey and Elizabeth B. Mclnemey brought suit pro se alleging that defendant Pinehurst Area Realty, Inc., the developer of the community where plaintiffs own a home, committed an unfair trade practice by amending the Declaration of Protective Covenants governing the properties in that community. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendant. Al
MACK-CALI REALTY CORP. VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (L-4903-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)public domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3097-18 MACK-CALI REALTY CORP., CAL-HARBOR V URBAN RENEWAL ASSOCIATES, LP, CAL-HARBOR VII URBAN RENEWAL ASSOCIATES, LP, ROSELAND RESIDENTIAL APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION TRUST, GARY WAGNER, IVAN February 16, 2021 BARON, H.P. ROOSEVE
Newman v. Silverpublic domain
553 F.Supp. 485 (1982) Murray NEWMAN and Capitol Motors, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Murray M. SILVER and Murray M. Silver, P.C. and Ralph LiButti, also known as Robert Presti, Defendants. No. 80 Civ. 1775 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 1982. As Amended October 27, 1982. *486
Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp.public domain
973 F.Supp. 98 (1997) Elizabeth BOGOSIAN, Plaintiff, v. WOLOOHOJIAN REALTY CORP., et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 88-0373B. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 31, 1997. *99 Eustace T. Pliakas, Tillinghast, Licht & Semonoff, Providence, RI, John W. Cannavino, William H. Bright, Jr., Charles D. Ray, Cummings &
McGillivray v. Newmanpublic domain
— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Trial Term (Conway, J.), entered May 22, 1980 in Ulster County, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and directed the cancellation of plaintiffs’ lis pendens. On December 20,1971, defendant, the record owner of certain premises located in the Village of Phoenicia, Town of Shandaken, Ulster County, upon which she conducted a motel business, entered into agreements with plaintiffs for the
JSS REALTY CO., LLC v. Town of Kittery, Mainepublic domain
177 F.Supp.2d 64 (2001) JSS REALTY CO., LLC, a New Hampshire limited liability company, Willey Creek Company, Inc., a New Hampshire corporation, Anne E. Blake, as successor trustee of Trust A of Harold L. Durgin Family Trust, and as successor trustee of Trust B of Harold L. Durgin Family Trust, Flagship Management Company, Inc., and D.L.J. Corp., a Maine corporation doing business as Century 21 Atlantic Realty, Plaintiffs v. TOWN OF KITTERY, MAIN
VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.public domain
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J. This case arises out of the attempts of a commercial-leasing broker to recover commissions for procuring tenants in a shopping center. The legal issue presented is whether the broker, which earned commissions for obtaining long-term tenants for the shopping-center owner, can impose an equitable lien on the rental income derived from those tenants after