Cases

57 F.3d 1269 Thomas FASHAUER, Jr., Appellant,v.NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. No. 94-5523. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued May 23, 1995.Decided June 29, 1995.Sur Petition For Rehearing Aug. 1, 1995. Marvin I. Barish (argued), Marvin I. Barish Law Offices, Philadelphia, PA

809 F.Supp. 171 (1992) NU-LIFE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Division of School Buildings of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Stuart Horowitz, Stanley W. Dobrowolski, John Trapanotto, John J. Manfredi, John Frisone, Nicholas E. Borg, and Does 1 through 20, Defendants. No. CV-86-0807 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York.

Case: 24-50149 Document: 280 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025 No. 24-50149 ____________

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Paula Forney, filed May 3, 2013 (Doc. 43)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court should dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Paula Forney under rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. Before the court is a dispute involving a contract between the United States, acting through the Department of State (“DOS”), and Kullman Industries, Inc. (“KI”), a company now no longer in business, which at the time specialized in large-scale modular construction. The contract obli

Case: 12-12908 Date Filed: 05/29/2013 Page: 1 of 61 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-12908 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two closely related issues: first, the extent to which an executive order that mandates suspicionless drug testing of 85,000 state employees violates the Fourth Amendment; and, second, the propriety of the district court’s decision to enjoin the Governor of Florida from testing all 85,000 covered employees. The district court, confronted

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D. In this appeal, we address a multifaceted challenge to the validity of the substantive rules of the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) for the third round that calculate affordable housing needs from 1999 to 2014 and establish criteria for satisfaction of the need between 2004 and 2014.1 N.J.A.C. 5:94-1.1 to - 9.2.

889 F.Supp. 642 (1995) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, and The City of New York, Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL 638 ... LOCAL 28 OF the SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. No. 71 Civ. 2877 (RLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 6, 1995. *643 *644

678 F.2d 257 28 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1614,25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 614,28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,668, 219 U.S.App.D.C. 393,94 Lab.Cas. P 34,186 Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., Appellants,v.Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and asPublic Printer of the United States, and hisagents, assigns and successors in office.Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al.,v.Danford L. SAWYER, J

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1406 COBRA NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION; SECRETARY OF LABOR; MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, on behalf of Russell Ratliff, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Mine Safety & Health R

18-1587-cv (L) Sullivan et al. v. Nassau County Interim Finance Authority et al. 1 IN THE 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 AUGUST TERM, 2019 6 7 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 8 DECIDED: MAY 13, 2020 9

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D. The primary issues presented in this appeal are whether state or federal law governs plaintiffs prospective lost wage claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (FELA), and whether the trial court erred in barring such claim in this matter. Plaintiff, Raymond Donovan, brought suit und

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT..............................................■......282 A. Alamance County...................................................282 1. Population and Demographics of Alamance County ................282 2. Law Enforcem

Filed: January 29, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1406 (WEVA 2013-368-D) COBRA NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION; SECRETARY OF LABOR; MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, on behalf of Russell Ratliff, Respond

278 N.J. Super. 129 (1994) 650 A.2d 808 JOHN KANE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., HARTZ MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT CORP., HARTZ-CLAIBORNE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LIZ CLAIBORNE, INC., NACAMULI ASSOCIATES, JOSEPH ROMEO, KENNETH CARL BONTE, KEITH A. MICHAELS, JOHN DOES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. HOWELL STEEL, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. EASTERN STEEL ERECTORS, INC., THIRD-PARTY