Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION MICHAEL B. KAPLAN, U.S.B.J. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court by way of Onilda E. Moran-Hernandez’s (“Debt- or” or “Defendant”) motion (“Motion”) to dismiss the adversary complaint (“Complaint”) filed by the State of New Jersey, Office of Special Compensation Funds, Uninsured Employer’s Fund (the “Department”). A hearing on the Motion was held on November

809 F.Supp. 171 (1992) NU-LIFE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Division of School Buildings of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Stuart Horowitz, Stanley W. Dobrowolski, John Trapanotto, John J. Manfredi, John Frisone, Nicholas E. Borg, and Does 1 through 20, Defendants. No. CV-86-0807 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York.

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. *555 The Women's Health Amendment to the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") mandated that women's health insurance include coverage for preventive health care. Through the Amendment, Congress directed the Health Resources and Services Administration ("HRSA"), a component o

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091545 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091444 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT January 6, 2026 State v. Johnson, No. S-24-0326, 2026 WY 1 This summary is intended to help the public understand the main points of the decision. It does not modify, supplement, or change the content of the Court’s opinion, or that of the specially concurring and dissenting opinions, and it should not be cited or relied on as legal precedent. Case Background In

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

606 F.Supp. 1161 (1985) Lucy Peng-Fei CHANG v. UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Diane R. SELEEN, et al. v. BOARD OF REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Sandra KRAYNEK v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Wendy ROWORTH v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Civ. A. Nos. 77-0070 S, 79-0087 S, 83-0044 S and 83-0099 S

727 F.2d 1429 34 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 584,33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,253Nemesio D. DOMINGO, Jr.; Samuel Cabansag, Jr.; Joseph C.Ancheta; Thomas G. Carpenter and Terri Jane Mast, asadministrator of the estate of Silme G. Domingo; NellieKookesh; Audrey A. Merculief; Frank Paul; Mary Paul;Tony Evon, Sr.; and Samuel Strauss,Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,v.NEW ENGLAND FISH COMPANY, and Nefco Fidalgo Pack

469 F.Supp. 329 (1978) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Raymond Williams et al., on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, General Building Contractors Association, Inc., Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, United Contractors Associ

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 335 II. FINDINGS 339 A. The Hiring System 339 B. The Philadelphia Plan 342 C. The Benjamin Franklin Programs I and II 345 D. Procedural History 347 E. The Delays and Contempt Issues Involving Abraham Freedman, Esquire 348 F. The Named Plai

181 F.3d 478 (3rd Cir. 1999) CATHERINE NATSU LANNING; ALTOVISE LOVE; BELINDA KELLY DODSON; DENISE DOUGHERTY; LYNNE ZIRILLIv.SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA); (D.C. CIVIL NO. 97-CV-00593)UNITED STATES OF AMERICAv.SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (D.C. CIVIL NO. 97-CV-01161) CATHERINE NATSU LANNING, ALTOVISE LOVE, BELINDA KELLY DODSON, DENISE DOUGHTERY AND LYNNE ZIRILLI, APPELLANTS IN NO

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: Plaintiff, Trinity Wall Street (“Trinity” or “Plaintiff’), owns shares of common stock of Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (‘Wal-Mart” or “Defendant”), which is the *621world’s largest retailer. Trinity seeks declaratory judgments to the effect that Wal-Mart violated federal securities laws

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA TRUCKING No. 20-55106 ASSOCIATION; RAVINDER SINGH; THOMAS ODOM, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:18-cv-02458- BEN-BLM v. ROB BONTA*, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Californ

OPINION HORN, Judge. This case arises from a construction project to renovate an electrical distribution system at McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey. The contract was awarded to TriGems Builders, Inc. (Tri-Gems). United States Fire Insurance Company (U.S.Fire) issued the required performance and payment bonds1 on behalf of Tri-Gems. U.S. Fire was the surety on the project. After

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Lockheed Martin Corporation brings this action against the United States under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., for recovery of past and future response costs to remediate the en

OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, District Judge. This case presents a challenge to the practice of investing employee pension contributions, and the employer’s matching contributions, in the employer company’s stock through the vehicle known as an *275“ESOP,” an Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Essentially the Plaintiffs claim that continuing to i