Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Never Slip Holdings, Inc.”
NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)public domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. Testa, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-9118.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typogra
Crandall v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.public domain
Crandall v Equinox Holdings, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 04902) Crandall v Equinox Holdings, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 04902 Decided on October 08, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
IGas Holdings, Inc. v. EPApublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2024 Decided August 1, 2025 No. 23-1261 IGAS HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, AND REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE AND ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE ATMOSPHERIC POLICY,
Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc. v. Woodrowpublic domain
Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc. v Woodrow (2022 NY Slip Op 02891) Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc. v Woodrow 2022 NY Slip Op 02891 Decided on April 28, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law R
OKL Holdings, Inc v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc.public domain
OKL Holdings, Inc v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 00141) OKL Holdings, Inc v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 00141 Decided on January 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New
Montgomery v. ELRAC, Enter. Holdings, Inc.public domain
Montgomery v ELRAC, Enter. Holdings, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 00508) Montgomery v ELRAC, Enter. Holdings, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 00508 Decided on January 27, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York St
in Re: Elusive Holdings, Inc.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00809-CV In re Elusive Holdings, Inc. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Elusive Holdings, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from an order signed by the trial court on October 28, 2019, disqualifying Elusive’s attorney
Morgan v. Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc.public domain
Morgan v Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 01830) Morgan v Worldview Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 01830 Decided on March 14, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by N
K.A. Fee v. Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (WCAB)public domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Kathleen A. Fee, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 554 C.D. 2024 : Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. : Submitted: May 6, 2025 (Workers’ Compensation : Appeal Board), :
141 Park Ave. Realties, Inc. v 141 Park Ave. Holdings, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 02631) 141 Park Ave. Realties, Inc. v 141 Park Ave. Holdings, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 02631 Decided on May 17, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by N
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Ashland Global Holdings, Inc. v. SuperAsh Remainderman, Ltd. Partnership, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2835.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front St
Wilder v. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc.public domain
Wilder v Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 06054) Wilder v Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 06054 Decided on August 6, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York
United States v. Tenacious Holdings, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER CARMAN, Judge: Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Tenacious Holdings, Inc. (“Tenacious”), formerly known as Ergodyne Corporation (“Ergodyne”). 1 Tenacious asks the Court to dismiss the case pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to s
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4716, 2019- Ohio-4716.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Fron
Orellana v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.public domain
*624OPINION OF THE COURT Manuel J. Mendez, J. It is ordered that plaintiff’s motion is granted to the extent of permitting service of an amended complaint and preliminarily enjoining Macy’s from demanding payment of civil penalties from individuals suspected of shoplifting while they are in Macy’s custody. Plaintiff Cinthia Carolina
Zelby Holdings, Inc. v. VideogeniX, Inc.public domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 16-P-874 Appeals Court ZELBY HOLDINGS, INC
Navistar, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)public domain
Per Curiam. *356 *49 {¶ 1} This case involves the commercial-activity-tax ("CAT") credit prescribed by R.C. 5751.53, and it comes before us for a second time, following our r
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLCpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Rowley v. Jerome JSD Holdings, LLCpublic domain
Rowley v Jerome JSD Holdings, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 01688) Rowley v Jerome JSD Holdings, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 01688 Decided on March 26, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju