Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nelson v. Watson”
Mushinsky v. Nelson, Watson & Assoc., LLCpublic domain
642 F.Supp.2d 470 (2009) Pavel MUSHINSKY v. NELSON, WATSON & ASSOC., LLC. Civil Action No. 09-610. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 13, 2009. Theodore E. Lorenz, Andrew M. Milz, Cary L. Flitter, Lundy Flitter Beldecos & Berger, P.C., Narberth, PA, for Pavel Mushinsky. *471 Richard J. Perr, Fi
Watson v. Nelsonpublic domain
709 So.2d 738 (1998) Anita Lambert WATSON v. Gladys Ola NELSON, et al. No. 97-C-2958. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 6, 1998. Denied. KNOLL, J., not on panel.
Watson v. Nelsonpublic domain
In re Watson, Anita Lambert;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Allen, 33rd Judicial District Court, No. C-89-553; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA97-0474. Denied. KNOLL, J., not on panel.
Watson v. Nelsonpublic domain
702 So.2d 1002 (1997) Anita Lambert WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gladys Ola NELSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-474. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 29, 1997. Writ Denied February 6, 1998. *1003 Jonathan Clyde Vidrine, Ville Platte, for Anita Lambert Watson. Douglas L. Hebe
Travis v. Watsonpublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent, in this circuit. PER CURIAM: McKindley Travis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 33
People v. Watsonpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered October 15, 2009, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Watson v. United Statespublic domain
16-655(L) Watson v. United States UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2016 (Argued: April 6, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017) Docket Nos. 16-655 (L), 16-1357 (XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x DAVINO WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
United States v. Watsonpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge The United States instituted this action against defendánts Joe Watson (“Watson”) and his wife Betty Watson in order to collect federal payroll tax assessments. Count I of the Complaint seeks to reduce to judgment the tax assessments made against Watson, and Count II seeks to foreclose federal tax liens against real property owned by Watson and h
State v. Nelsonpublic domain
SAWAYA, J. We have consolidated for decision three appeals that present a common issue of statutory interpretation. The statute at issue is section 316.125, Florida Statutes (2013), and it governs entry of vehicles onto adjacent highways from adjoining business locations and parking lots. We must decide whether the trial court correctly interpreted this statute to require only that the driver yield the right-of-way to vehic
Matter of Watson v. Maraghpublic domain
Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Michelle I. Schauer, J.), dated October 8, 2015. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of that court (Carol Ann Jordan, S.M.) entered June 12, 2015, which, after a hearing, directed him to pay child support to the mother. Ordered that the order dated October 8, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disb
Watson ex rel. Watson v. Garamendipublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Kathleen Elizabeth Watson and four other plaintiff-appellants (collectively, the “Policyholders”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action for lack of standing. We review the dismissal de novo, Kennedy v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 268 F.3d 763, 767 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm the district court’s judgment. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, w
Watson v. Garzapublic domain
316 S.W.3d 589 (2008) Ronald WATSON v. Roberto GARZA, et al. No. W2007-02480-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. June 19, 2008 Session. November 7, 2008. No Permission to Appeal Applied for to the Supreme Court. *591 Glenn K. Vines, Jr., Memphis, TN, for Appella
Watson v. Glenwood Regional Medical Centerpublic domain
MOORE, J. | TLaurie Watson appeals a judgment that sustained exceptions of prescription and dismissed her medical malpractice claim. The issue is whether she filed her request for a medical review panel (“MRP”) within one year from the date of discovery of the alleged act, omission or neglect, as required by La. R.S. 9:5628 A. Discerning no manifest error, we affirm. Factual Background
Watson v. Dillon Companies, Inc.public domain
797 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2011) Wayne WATSON and Mary Watson, Plaintiffs, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a/ King Soopers, also d/b/a Inter-American Products, Inc., et al., Defendants.[1] Civil Action No. 08-cv-00091-WDM-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 22, 2011. *1141 Kenneth B. McClain, Andrew Kelley Smi
Nelson v. Whirlpool Corp.public domain
727 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2010) David H. NELSON, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-0520-WS-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 4, 2010. *1296 George M. Keahey, Robert D. Keahey, Wyman O. Gilmore, Jr., Richard Edwin Lamberth, Ronnie E. Keahey,
Nelson v. Watsonpublic domain
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner was arrested charged with the offense of having failed to place a documentary stamp upon a written instrument on which it was required under the provisions of Chapter 15787, Acts of the Legislature of 1931. The written instrument on which it was alleged the petitioner failed to place the required revenue stamp was set out in the affidavit as follows: "HERNDON'S INC. "Tallahassee, Florida, August 30, 1933.
Watson v. Dundaspublic domain
JUSTICE RICE dissenting in part. ¶46 I dissent from the Court’s first holding herein, regarding the easement grant. ¶47 The Court finds ambiguity in the easement document by comparing the grant language with the recital language, see ¶ 19, and resolves that ambiguity by applying general principles of
Watson v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
389 S.C. 434 (2010) 699 S.E.2d 169 Sonya L. WATSON, Stacy Watson, Curtis L. Watson, and Shirley Watson Individually and as Parents of Sonya L. Watson, Stacy Watson, and Thelma Watson, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, TRW, INC., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., and D&D Motors, Inc., Defendants. Willie E. Carter, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patricia Ann S. Carter, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. F
Watson v. Statepublic domain
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 James Watson (Watson) appeals from an order entered by the *211Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denying his petition for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 We address the fo
Estate of Nelson v. Nesterpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Ambir and Kortney Nelson, by and through their mother and next friend, Jeanne Eich, appeal the probate court’s judgment declaring certain real estate to be owned by Dwayne Nelson (“Husband”) and Jennifer Hanks (‘Wife”) as tenants in common. Husband and Wife’s separation agreement, calling for Wife to quitclaim her interest in the real estate, is not enforceable because it was