⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Nelson v. Johnson”

Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 47× · 2010 ND 23; 778 N.W.2d 773; 2010 N.D. LEXIS 25; 2010 WL 536929
MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] Carol Johnson appeals from a judgment evicting her from a townhouse she rented from Kathy Nelson and ordering Johnson to pay Nelson $520 in unpaid rent and late fees, $400 in attorney fees, and $130 in costs and disbursements. Johnson argues a three-day notice of intention to evict her was not properly served on her and the court erred in not making findings on her defenses of waiver and estoppel and i
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 977 A.2d 1088; 602 Pa. 9; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1438
ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008-10-22 · Published · cited 1× · 959 A.2d 904; 598 Pa. 601; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1889
ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED. *Page 602
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1193; 124 S. Ct. 1444
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 531 U.S. 980; 121 S. Ct. 429
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999-08-25 · Published · cited 13× · 1999 ND 171; 599 N.W.2d 246; 1999 N.D. LEXIS 191; 1999 WL 643174
599 N.W.2d 246 (1999) 1999 ND 171 James E. NELSON and Kathleen F. Nelson, husband and wife, individually and as the surviving parents of Matthew E. Nelson, deceased, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Scott W. JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant, and William Johnson and Michel J. DuFault, Defendants. No. 980324. Supreme Court of North Dakota. August 25, 1999.
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 635 N.W.2d 515; 2001 Minn. LEXIS 757
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b). Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: James H. Gilbert Associat
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001-11-13 · Published · cited 1× · 635 N.W.2d 515; 2001 WL 1486783
635 N.W.2d 515 (2001) Roger NELSON, Respondent, v. JOHNSON BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS and State Farm Group, Employer and Insurer, and Fullerton Building Systems and CNA Insurance Company, Employer and Insurer, and Fullerton Building Systems and U.S.F. & G., Relators, and HealthPartners, Inc., and Prairie Rehabilitation Services, Intervenors. No. C5-01-1451. Supreme Court of Minnesota.<
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 594 So. 2d 1228; 1992 Ala. LEXIS 89; 1992 WL 28987
On December 12, 1989, Jasper Johnson, Jr., sued Lucille Nelson, alleging conversion and fraud. Nelson answered the complaint on December 21, 1989. On September 12, 1991, the case was heard before a jury and the jury rendered a verdict for Johnson in the amount of $5,000 plus the return of the property in question. The court entered a judgment based on that verdict, and Nelson appeals. We affirm. Included in the record on appeal are the complaint, motions, orders, the defendant'
Johnson v. Nelsonpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 30× · 290 Neb. 703
Nebraska Advance Sheets JOHNSON v. NELSON 703 Cite as 290 Neb. 703 If the jury believed Ginn’s version of the facts, then Ginn did not breach a duty to ensure that the documents were signed before or after the closing. Instead, Balames’ injury was caused by his failure to follow Ginn’s advice, his failure to review the documents for the required signatures, and his misrepresenta- tion to Ginn that the d
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 1984-04-06 · Published · cited 15× · 679 P.2d 662; 106 Idaho 385; 1984 Ida. LEXIS 460
679 P.2d 662 (1984) 106 Idaho 385 Lyle NELSON and Loa Nelson, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Raymond H. JOHNSON and Wilma Johnson, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 14760. Supreme Court of Idaho. April 6, 1984. *663 William A. Parsons, of Parsons, Smith, Stone & Fletcher, Burle
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-02-07 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NELSON EATON JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-3279 [February 7, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circu
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NELSON EATON JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-269 [June 28, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthi
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010-11-01 · Published · cited 12× · 270 F.R.D. 689; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117098; 2010 WL 4282106
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES I. COHN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification [DE 51] (“Motion”). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, Defendant’s Opposition [DE 64], Plaintiffs Reply [DE 75], has heard argument of counsel in open court on the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises.
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1973-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 414 U.S. 1086; 94 S. Ct. 603
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion to defer consideration of petition and certiorari denied.
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County · 1970-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 55 Pa. D. & C.2d 21; 1970 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 16
COFFROTH, P. J., At pretrial conference held March 16, 1970, the question of the proper measure of damages for injuries to a truck-tractor and trailer was raised for pretrial rulings by the court on the following factual assertions: The collision occurred April 6, 1967, on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Allegheny Township, Somerset County. The damaged vehicles were towed to a Bedford garage. Plaintiff then entered
Johnson v. Nelsonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. California · 2001-04-10 · Published · cited 24× · 142 F. Supp. 2d 1215; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10459; 2001 WL 418719
142 F.Supp.2d 1215 (2001) Samuel M. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Craig NELSON, Respondent. No. 00-CV-1941 W (AJB). United States District Court, S.D. California. April 10, 2001. *1216 *1217 Samuel M. Johnson, San Diego, CA, Prose. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Ro
State v. Nelsonpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2018-06-14 · Published · cited 19× · 419 P.3d 410
JOHNSON, J. ¶ 1 This case involves review of a trial court "to convict" attempted first degree robbery instruction. Petitioner Edward Nelson contends that the State had to prove that the employee he was attempting to rob had ownership, representative, or possessory interest in the property. For this proposition he relies on the holding in State v. Richie1 and argues that this "essential element"
State v. Nelsonpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 215 So. 3d 389; 2017 WL 430229; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 109
WILLIAMS, J. liThe defendant, Daryl Nelson, was charged by bill of information with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The district court granted the defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle. The state sought supervisory review of the trial court’s ruling and this court granted th
Nelson v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1963-01-11 · Published · cited 27× · 212 F. Supp. 233
212 F.Supp. 233 (1963) Lester R. NELSON, L. Boerebach, C. H. Bunkholt, Gunnar Peterson, E. H. Everetts, Ralph Hallberg, Harry Burns and Vern Thomay, Petitioners, v. Alfred JOHNSON and Robert J. Jensen, Respondents. No. 4-61-Civ. 280. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. December 21, 1962. As Amended January 11, 1963.