Cases

782 F.Supp.2d 152 (2011) Gianine BRACCIODIETA-NELSON, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 02:10-cv-854. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. April 27, 2011. *154 Lindsay Fulton Osterhout, Oakmont, PA, for Plaintiff. Paul Kovac, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, f

SUMMARY ORDER Ronald J. Pryor, proceeding pro se, appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Brodie, J.) in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security. Pryor seeks review of the Commissioner’s determination that Pryor made $15,922.54 in unreported earnings in 2008. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and record of the prior proceedings,- to which we refer only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.

252 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2003) Vickie R. NELSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CIV.A.01-2317-DJW. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 7, 2003. *1151 Joan H. Deans, J.H. Deans Law Office, Raytown, MO, for plaintiff. Melanie D. Caro, David D. Zimmerman, Office of Unite

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Maria Cedeno, pro se, appeals from the June 25, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dearie, C.J.) granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) motion to remand for further administrative proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case.

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Maria Cedeno, pro se, appeals from the June 25, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dearie, C.J.) granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) motion to remand for further administrative proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case.

SUMMARY ORDER Adriano Duran appeals from an order entered July 19, 2007 by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.) affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the *136procedural history,

MEMORANDUM *** Arthur Schiel appeals a grant of summary judgment validating the denial of his claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We reverse and direct the district court to remand to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) must consider whether an older age category w

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Ronnie L. Marion appeals from the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and scope of the issues presented on appeal.1 We review a district court’s judgment on the pleadings de novo. Ja

648 F.3d 721 (2011) Pamela KEYSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-35371. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. *722 Submitted March 9, 2011.[*] Filed June 1, 2011. *723 Tim Wilborn, Wilborn L

SUMMARY ORDER Pro se plaintiff Charles T. Surgeon appeals from the district court’s award of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). Surgeon argues that the Commissioner erred in concluding that he was not under a disability from December 31, 1981 to February 5,1985.2 We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and record of prior proceedings

*559SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff-appellant Cornel Nicolae, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Block, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported D

MEMORANDUM ** Evelyn Yvonne Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s decision in a social security case de novo. Morgan v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir.1999). The A

MEMORANDUM ** Evelyn Yvonne Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s decision in a social security case de novo. Morgan v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir.1999). The A

MANION, Circuit Judge. Linnie Nelson applied for Social Security disability benefits, but an administrative law judge denied her application, concluding that she was not disabled. Nelson appealed to the district court to reverse the ALJ and instruct it to award her disability benefits. The Commissioner of Social Security moved for remand, acknowledging factual conflicts in the ad

*561MEMORANDUM ** Floyd Davidson appeals the judgment of the District Court for the District of Oregon reversing the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits and remanding Davidson’s claim to the Commissioner for further proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. W

MEMORANDUM *** Rhonda Yarbour appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security determining that Yarbour was not entitled to Supplemental Security Income payments under 42 U.S.C. § 423. Initially, we hold that the district court did not err either by declining to review the merits of a neuropsychological evaluation performed well a

MEMORANDUM3 Kenneth Steele appeals the district court’s order affirming a determination he is not entitled to social security disability insurance benefits. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Steele contends the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to follow the instruction

MEMORANDUM ** Kurt A. Mundt appeals the decision of the district court affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Mundt’s application for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We review de novo to ensure that the decision was supported by substantial evidence and a correct application of the law. Roberts v. Shalala, 66 F.3d 179, 182 (9th Cir.1995).<

MEMORANDUM** Gordon Stout appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Act. Stout contends the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed to provide sufficient reasons for rejecting the opinions of his treating mental health

MEMORANDUM *** Katherine Savage appeals the district court’s decision upholding the final determination by the Commissioner of Social Security that Savage was ineligible for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) determined that Savage suffers from schizophrenia but would not be disabled exclusive of her substance abuse. In so finding, t