⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Nelson v. Burnsville Police Department”

District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986-05-13 · Published · cited 6× · 634 F. Supp. 1402; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25562
634 F.Supp. 1402 (1986) CHRIS N., Plaintiff, v. BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA, a political subdivision, and John Does 1-10, Defendants. Civ. No. 4-85-1423. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. May 13, 1986. *1403 Charles S. Zimmerman and Barry G. Reed, Zimmerman, Caplan & Reed, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintif
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 0× · 84 F. Supp. 3d 886; 2015 WL 439509
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Henne-pin County’s Motion to Dismiss and/or to Sever [Doc. No. 27]; (2) Defendant City of St. Paul’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 32]; (3) Defendant City of Minneapolis’ Motion to Dismiss or for Severance [Doc. No. 37]; (4) De
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-11-03 · Published · cited 2× · 57 F. Supp. 3d 1124; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156435; 2014 WL 5530590
SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants Michael Campion, Ramona Dohman, and Pat McCormack’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 54] and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 131]; (2) Defendant Rochester Motors’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 76]; (3) Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-09-01 · Published · cited 0× · 835 F.3d 856; 2016 WL 4547350
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) maintains a database of driver’s license data (DPS database). It is the alleged misuse of that database information which is the subject of these appeals. A number of Minnesota driver’s license holders (plaintiffs) brought suit against numerous cities, counties, and other government entities (local entities); numerous unknown law enfo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1770 ___________________________ Jessica Leah Kampschroer; Cory Patrick Kampschroer, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants, v. Anoka County; City of Anoka; City of Apple Valley; City of Arlington; City o
District Court, D. Maine · 2019-05-03 · Published · cited 4× · 380 F. Supp. 3d 869
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This case aptly illustrates the adage that there are always "two sides to every story." On the one hand, Plaintiff Aaron Benner ("Benner") claims that, after he (a tenured African-American elementary school teacher) spoke against Defendant St. Paul Public Schools' ("SPPS") "racial equity policy" during a widely-covered May 2014 school board meeting, SPPS worked with his new Principa
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 136 F. Supp. 3d 1049; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134133; 2015 WL 5737112
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court Plaintiff Michelle Marquardt (“Mar-quardt”) brings this action against various cities and counties in Minnesota, along with several other governmental entities and officials (“defendants”), alleging that law enforcement officers illegally accessed her driver’s license information, in violation
Ray v. Anoka Countypublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 24 F. Supp. 3d 843; 2014 WL 2511087; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75792
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and/or to Sever. For the reasons that follow, the Motions to Dismiss are granted and the. Motions to Sever are denied as moot. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michelle Ray alleges that Defendants1 illegally accessed her driver’s
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015-02-11 · Published · cited 120× · 859 N.W.2d 762; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 46; 2015 WL 543160
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1245 Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Dissenting, Page and Stras, JJ. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: February 11, 2015
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 789 F. Supp. 2d 1133; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51227; 2011 WL 1833102
789 F.Supp.2d 1133 (2011) MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA HOCKEY, INC.; District 6 of Minnesota Amateur Hockey Association; Bloomington Jefferson Hockey Booster Club; Bloomington Kennedy Hockey Association; Bloomington Youth Hockey Association; Burnsville Hockey Club; Chaska Chanhassen Hockey Association; Eden Prairie Hockey Association; Edina Hockey Association; Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association; New Prague Hockey Associat
District Court, D. Maine · 2019-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 370 F. Supp. 3d 967
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge *974This case arises at the intersection of two competing freedoms: the freedom of public university student groups, and their invited guest speakers, to exercise their First Amendment rights, and the freedom of public universities to manage their facilities in the manner that best advances the University's educational
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011-01-04 · Published · cited 2× · 761 F. Supp. 2d 848; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 537; 2011 WL 14361
761 F.Supp.2d 848 (2011) MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA HOCKEY, INC.; District of Minnesota Amateur Hockey, Association, District 6 of Minnesota Amateur Hockey Association; Bloomington Jefferson Hockey Booster Club; Bloomington Kennedy Hockey Association; Bloomington Youth Hockey Association; Burnsville Hockey Club; Chaska Chanhassen Hockey Association; *849 Eden Hockey Association; Eden
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-08-30 · Published · cited 4× · 935 F.3d 645
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jessica and Cory Kampschroer brought this action against a group of cities, counties, local entities, and individuals, alleging violations of the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721 - 2725. After dismissing claims against some of the defendants, the district co
Potocnik v. Carlsonpublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-03-24 · Published · cited 2× · 9 F. Supp. 3d 981; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38018; 2014 WL 1206403
ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Sheila Potocnik brings numerous claims against numerous defendants for unlawfully disclosing or obtaining information contained in her driver’s-license record. This matter is before the Court on two motions: the motion of defendants Michael Campion and Ramona Dohman (collectively, “the Commissioners”) to dismiss for failure to state a claim and the mot
Bigos v. Kluenderpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000-06-06 · Published · cited 1× · 611 N.W.2d 816; 2000 WL 719732
611 N.W.2d 816 (2000) Ted BIGOS, d/b/a The Observatory Apartments, Respondent, v. Joel KLUENDER, et al., Appellants, West Bend Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Lori Tejeda, Respondent, Intervenor, Joan Azzam, Respondent, Scott Church, et al., Respondents, Intervenors, Dan Windorf, et al., John Titus, et al., Brian Dickerhoof, John Doe, et al., Defendants. Nos. CX-99-1928, CX-99-1931, C7-99-2065.
Byrd v. Hopsonpublic domain
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003-05-23 · Published · cited 5× · 265 F. Supp. 2d 594; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8934; 2003 WL 21276044
265 F.Supp.2d 594 (2003) Betty R. BYRD, Plaintiff, v. Jack HOPSON; Barbara Hopson; Cynthia Hopson; Holger C. Nelson; Kenneth R. Fox, in his individual capacity and as Sheriff of Mitchell County; and Donald Street, in his individual capacity and as Deputy Sheriff of Mitchell County, Defendants. No. CIV. 1:02CV212. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-05-28 · Published · cited 1× · 567 F.3d 278; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11179; 2009 WL 1478961
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. As part of its efforts to revitalize the local economy, the City of Detroit in the late 1990s built a new stadium, Comerica Park, for its professional baseball team (the Tigers) and a new stadium, Ford Field, for its football team (the Lions). Soon after completing the stadiums (stadia if you like), Detroit sought to featur
Thomas v. Barzepublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 57 F. Supp. 3d 1040; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140844; 2014 WL 4954676
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiff Dontae Thomas was a senior at Patrick Henry High School in Minneapolis when, after lunch in January 2012, he was asked to meet with two school police officers, Defendants Tyrone Barze and Victor Mills. According to Thomas, during this meeting in an inner office in the special
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998-06-12 · Published · cited 17× · 578 N.W.2d 817; 1998 WL 312810
578 N.W.2d 817 (1998) In re the Marriage of Sandra Lee HOLMBERG, petitioner, Appellant, v. Ronald Gerald HOLMBERG, Respondent, Denise M. KALIS-FULLER, n/k/a Denise M. Kalis, petitioner, Respondent, v. Lee V. FULLER, Appellant, In re the Marriage of Kristi Sue CARLSON, petitioner, Respondent, v. Steven Alan CARLSON, Appellant, Dakota County, Respondent. No. C7-97-926, C7-97-1512, C8-97-1132 and C8-98-3
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-05-01 · Published · cited 37× · 212 F.3d 1084; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8579; 2000 WL 555207
WOLLMAN, Chief Judge. Section 4454 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 creates exceptions to the Medicare and Medicaid Acts for persons who have religious objections to the receipt of medical care. These exceptions enable such individuals to receive government assistance for nonmedical care that they receive in facilities that, for religious reasons, administer only nonmedical services. Appellants Bruce Bostrom, Steven Peter