⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Neenah Enterprises, Inc.”

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991-05-01 · Published · cited 18× · 472 N.W.2d 790; 163 Wis. 2d 534; 1991 Wisc. App. LEXIS 986; 1991 WL 150433
163 Wis.2d 534 (1991) 472 N.W.2d 790 Curtis D. RADFORD and C. Scott Radford, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. J.J.B. ENTERPRISES, LTD., Milwaukee Marine, Inc., and James J. Bisenius, Jr., Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,[†] v. BOAT WORKS, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, and American States Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Third-Party Defendants. No. 90-0994.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 360 Wis. 2d 459; 2015 WI App 18; 860 N.W.2d 524; 2015 Wisc. App. LEXIS 63
LUNDSTEN, J. f 1. Neenah Foundry Co. appeals the circuit court's order upholding a Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) decision. After Neenah Foundry emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization in federal bankruptcy court, LIRC denied Nee-nah Foundry's request to be treated as a new employer for purposes of Wisconsin's unemployment insurance law. The effect of LIRC's decision is that, over a seven-year period, Neenah Foundry w
United States Court of International Trade · 1997-11-07 · Published · cited 17× · 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 1165; 983 F. Supp. 192; 21 C.I.T. 1165; 19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2441; 1997 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 152
Memorandum Opinion DiCarlo, Senior Judge: Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent the collection of countervailing duty deposits at the new company-specific rates published in Certain Iron-Metal Castings from India, 62 Fed. Reg. 32,297 (Dep’t Commerce 1997) (final admin, review) [hereinafter Final Determination]. Plaintiffs are asking the court to preserve th
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 65 N.E.3d 1142; 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 477; 2016 WL 7492538
ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issue [1] Dalton Corporation (“Dalton”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment, raising two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Dalton’s motion. Concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 160 Wis. 2d 783; 467 N.W.2d 134; 1991 Wisc. App. LEXIS 106
SUNDBY, J. In these actions for injunctive relief, the Department of Natural Resources claims the right to deferential review of its determination of flood elevations developed solely for the purposes of trial and without following prescribed administrative procedures.1 We conclude that the department, having chosen to litigate in the judicial arena, is bound by the rules which apply to judicial proce
United States Court of International Trade · 1998-09-29 · Published · cited 1× · 24 F. Supp. 2d 318; 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 957; 22 C.I.T. 957; 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2054; 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143
24 F.Supp.2d 318 (1998) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry Of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., And Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., RSI (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Ca
United States Court of International Trade · 1997-05-07 · Published · cited 2× · 964 F. Supp. 409; 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 487; 21 C.I.T. 487; 19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1575; 1997 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 53
964 F.Supp. 409 (1997) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., RSI (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co.,: Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Ca
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994-04-01 · Published · cited 13× · 15 F.3d 1054
15 F.3d 1054 CRESWELL TRADING COMPANY, INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D &L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., VirginiaPrecast Corp. and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs,andCity Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia,Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andCrescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., R.B.Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P., Ltd., SuperCastings (India), Carnation Enterprises P., Lt
United States Court of International Trade · 2004-04-09 · Published · cited 56× · 318 F. Supp. 2d 1339; 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 480; 28 C.I.T. 480; 26 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1480; 2004 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 31
318 F.Supp.2d 1339 (2004) SHANGHAI FOREIGN TRADE ENTERPRISES CO., LTD., and Shanghai Pudong Malleable Iron Plant, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Anvil International, Inc. and Ward Manufacturing, Inc. Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 04-33, Court No. 03-00218. United States Court of International Trade. April 9, 2004. *1
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 995; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88895
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. DUFFIN, U.S. Magistrate Judge I. Introduction Plaintiffs Jerome Janusz, Sharon Jan-usz, and Patrice Jardanowski filed the present action against various entities, including Symmetry Medical, Inc. (Symmetry), which was allegedly involved in the design, testing, manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, or similar actions of the M-Cor Modular Hip Syste
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982-08-20 · Published · cited 19× · 22 B.R. 653; 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3491
22 B.R. 653 (1982) In the Matter of Robert F. GRACE, Debtor. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEENAH, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. GRACE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 82-00702, Adv. No. 82-0301. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 20, 1982. *654 John C. Wenning, Sigman, Shiff, Janssen, Stack & Wenning, Appleton, Wis., fo
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985-10-11 · Published · cited 34× · 774 F.2d 1144; 227 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 541; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15296
DAVIS, Circuit Judge. Appellant Kimberly-Clark Corporation (K-C) seeks review of a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board or TTAB) dismissing K-C’s opposition (No. 66,563) to the application of H. Douglas Enterprises (HDE) to register the mark DOUGIES for combination training pants and disposable diapers (Serial N
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973-01-03 · Published · cited 1× · 351 F. Supp. 617; 176 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 439; 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15580
351 F.Supp. 617 (1973) ARCTIC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HUBER PAINT & GLASS, INC., Defendant. ARCTIC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOULDER PARTS CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 70-C-4, 70-C-88. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. January 3, 1973. Thomas W. Ehrmann, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff; Kenneth D. Siegfried, Minnea
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 872 F. Supp. 2d 215; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72121; 2012 WL 1888129
MEMORANDUM & ORDER HURLEY, Senior District Judge: Winter-Wolff International, Inc. (“Winter-Wolff’ or “plaintiff’) commenced this action in Nassau County Supreme Court. Defendant later removed the case to this Court, citing diversity as the basis for federal jurisdiction.1 Plaintiffs second amended complaint (“SAC”), filed after removal, brings breach of contract and other
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996-11-13 · Published · cited 16× · 557 N.W.2d 835; 206 Wis. 2d 435; 1996 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1444
206 Wis.2d 435 (1996) 557 N.W.2d 835 MODERN MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,[†] v. ADVANCED TOOLING SPECIALISTS, INC., Corbett W. Harbor, James S. Luebke and Bruce W. Wiater, Defendants-Respondents. No. 95-3525. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 3, 1996. Decided November 13, 1996.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-08-25 · Published · cited 0× · 834 F.3d 943; 2016 WL 4473247
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2789 ___________________________ In re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation ------------------------------ Hartig Drug Company; Jason Moore’s Texaco, L.L.C., doing business as Moore’s Texaco; Marlo Ortiz; Stephen Morrison; Steven Tseffos;
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011-03-01 · Published · cited 3× · 776 F. Supp. 2d 857; 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20111; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20717; 2011 WL 806411
776 F.Supp.2d 857 (2011) APPLETON PAPERS INC. and NCR Corp., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER CO., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-C-16. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 1, 2011. *859 Anthony J. Steffek, Brandon J. Evans, Heidi D. Melzer, Michael L. Hermes, Hermes Law Ltd., Green Bay, WI, Dennis P. Birke,
United States Court of International Trade · 1998-06-24 · Published · cited 2× · 4 F. Supp. 2d 1264
4 F.Supp.2d 1264 (1998) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., Rsi (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), C
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007-07-11 · Published · cited 38× · 2007 WI 93; 734 N.W.2d 428; 302 Wis. 2d 599; 2007 Wisc. LEXIS 422
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 1. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals reversing the circuit court's judgment1 granting the City of Janesville (the City) a writ of assistance to remove the defendant, CC Midwest, Inc. (CC Midwest), from property that the City previously acquired by exercising its power of eminent domain. The circuit court concluded that there were no issues of materi
United States Court of International Trade · 1997-06-26 · Published · cited 5× · 969 F. Supp. 90; 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 700; 21 C.I.T. 700; 19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1784; 1997 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 85
969 F.Supp. 90 (1997) KAJARIA IRON CASTINGS PVT. LTD., Calcutta Ferrous Ltd., Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd., Commex Corporation, Dinesh Brothers, Nandikeshwari Pvt. Ltd., Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, R.B. Agarwalla & Company, RSI Limited, Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd., Tirupati International (P) Ltd., and UMA Iron & Steel Co., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Alleg