Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Neenah Enterprises, Inc.”
Radford v. J.J.B. Enterprises, Ltd.public domain
163 Wis.2d 534 (1991) 472 N.W.2d 790 Curtis D. RADFORD and C. Scott Radford, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. J.J.B. ENTERPRISES, LTD., Milwaukee Marine, Inc., and James J. Bisenius, Jr., Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,[] v. BOAT WORKS, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, and American States Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Third-Party Defendants. No. 90-0994.
LUNDSTEN, J. f 1. Neenah Foundry Co. appeals the circuit court's order upholding a Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) decision. After Neenah Foundry emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization in federal bankruptcy court, LIRC denied Nee-nah Foundry's request to be treated as a new employer for purposes of Wisconsin's unemployment insurance law. The effect of LIRC's decision is that, over a seven-year period, Neenah Foundry w
Shree Rama Enterprises v. United Statespublic domain
Memorandum Opinion DiCarlo, Senior Judge: Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent the collection of countervailing duty deposits at the new company-specific rates published in Certain Iron-Metal Castings from India, 62 Fed. Reg. 32,297 (Dep’t Commerce 1997) (final admin, review) [hereinafter Final Determination]. Plaintiffs are asking the court to preserve th
Dalton Corporation v. Larry Myers and Loa Myerspublic domain
ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issue [1] Dalton Corporation (“Dalton”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment, raising two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Dalton’s motion. Concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in
State v. Ozga Enterprises, Inc.public domain
SUNDBY, J. In these actions for injunctive relief, the Department of Natural Resources claims the right to deferential review of its determination of flood elevations developed solely for the purposes of trial and without following prescribed administrative procedures.1 We conclude that the department, having chosen to litigate in the judicial arena, is bound by the rules which apply to judicial proce
24 F.Supp.2d 318 (1998) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry Of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., And Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., RSI (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Ca
964 F.Supp. 409 (1997) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., RSI (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co.,: Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Ca
Creswell Trading Company, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
15 F.3d 1054 CRESWELL TRADING COMPANY, INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D &L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., VirginiaPrecast Corp. and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs,andCity Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia,Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andCrescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., R.B.Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P., Ltd., SuperCastings (India), Carnation Enterprises P., Lt
318 F.Supp.2d 1339 (2004) SHANGHAI FOREIGN TRADE ENTERPRISES CO., LTD., and Shanghai Pudong Malleable Iron Plant, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Anvil International, Inc. and Ward Manufacturing, Inc. Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 04-33, Court No. 03-00218. United States Court of International Trade. April 9, 2004. *1
Janusz v. Symmetry Medical Inc.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. DUFFIN, U.S. Magistrate Judge I. Introduction Plaintiffs Jerome Janusz, Sharon Jan-usz, and Patrice Jardanowski filed the present action against various entities, including Symmetry Medical, Inc. (Symmetry), which was allegedly involved in the design, testing, manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, or similar actions of the M-Cor Modular Hip Syste
First National Bank of Neenah v. Grace (In Re Grace)public domain
22 B.R. 653 (1982) In the Matter of Robert F. GRACE, Debtor. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEENAH, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. GRACE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 82-00702, Adv. No. 82-0301. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 20, 1982. *654 John C. Wenning, Sigman, Shiff, Janssen, Stack & Wenning, Appleton, Wis., fo
DAVIS, Circuit Judge. Appellant Kimberly-Clark Corporation (K-C) seeks review of a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board or TTAB) dismissing K-C’s opposition (No. 66,563) to the application of H. Douglas Enterprises (HDE) to register the mark DOUGIES for combination training pants and disposable diapers (Serial N
351 F.Supp. 617 (1973) ARCTIC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HUBER PAINT & GLASS, INC., Defendant. ARCTIC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOULDER PARTS CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 70-C-4, 70-C-88. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. January 3, 1973. Thomas W. Ehrmann, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff; Kenneth D. Siegfried, Minnea
MEMORANDUM & ORDER HURLEY, Senior District Judge: Winter-Wolff International, Inc. (“Winter-Wolff’ or “plaintiff’) commenced this action in Nassau County Supreme Court. Defendant later removed the case to this Court, citing diversity as the basis for federal jurisdiction.1 Plaintiffs second amended complaint (“SAC”), filed after removal, brings breach of contract and other
206 Wis.2d 435 (1996) 557 N.W.2d 835 MODERN MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,[] v. ADVANCED TOOLING SPECIALISTS, INC., Corbett W. Harbor, James S. Luebke and Bruce W. Wiater, Defendants-Respondents. No. 95-3525. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 3, 1996. Decided November 13, 1996.
Hartig Drug Co. v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2789 ___________________________ In re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation ------------------------------ Hartig Drug Company; Jason Moore’s Texaco, L.L.C., doing business as Moore’s Texaco; Marlo Ortiz; Stephen Morrison; Steven Tseffos;
Appleton Papers Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Co.public domain
776 F.Supp.2d 857 (2011) APPLETON PAPERS INC. and NCR Corp., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER CO., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-C-16. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 1, 2011. *859 Anthony J. Steffek, Brandon J. Evans, Heidi D. Melzer, Michael L. Hermes, Hermes Law Ltd., Green Bay, WI, Dennis P. Birke,
Creswell Trading Co., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
4 F.Supp.2d 1264 (1998) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., Rsi (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), C
City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.public domain
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 1. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals reversing the circuit court's judgment1 granting the City of Janesville (the City) a writ of assistance to remove the defendant, CC Midwest, Inc. (CC Midwest), from property that the City previously acquired by exercising its power of eminent domain. The circuit court concluded that there were no issues of materi
Kajaria Iron Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. United Statespublic domain
969 F.Supp. 90 (1997) KAJARIA IRON CASTINGS PVT. LTD., Calcutta Ferrous Ltd., Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd., Commex Corporation, Dinesh Brothers, Nandikeshwari Pvt. Ltd., Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, R.B. Agarwalla & Company, RSI Limited, Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd., Tirupati International (P) Ltd., and UMA Iron & Steel Co., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Alleg