⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Neels v. Young”

Neels v. Dooleypublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2022-01-19 · Published · cited 8× · 2022 S.D. 4
#29201-aff-PJD 2022 S.D. 4 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** RONALD LEE NEELS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. BOB DOOLEY, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison, and any Successor/Predecessor in Interest, Respondent and Appellee. **** APPEAL FROM THE
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00054-CV YOUNG FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, Appellant V. MARY KAYE YOUNG, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-229 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Steve
Woods v. Youngpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1991-04-04 · Published · cited 239× · 807 P.2d 455; 53 Cal. 3d 315; 279 Cal. Rptr. 613; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2482; 91 Daily Journal DAR 3964; 1991 Cal. LEXIS 1217
Opinion KENNARD,J. —In 1975, the Legislature enacted the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) in response to a health care crisis caused by a rapid increase in premiums for medical malpractice insurance. Among MICRA’s many provisions is one that requires a plaintiff, before filing an action based on a health care provider’s professional negligence, to give the defendant at least 90 days’ notice of int
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00535-CV 5406912 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947-12-17 · Published · cited 32× · 56 A.2d 140; 189 Md. 428; 1947 Md. LEXIS 369
This suit was instituted by Miss Esther C. Young, of near Relay, to recover for personal injuries and property damage which she sustained when her Buick automobile was struck by a trouble truck owned by the Baltimore Transit Company. The jury in the Baltimore City Court rendered a verdict in her favor for the sum of $950, and the transit company appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict. The accident occurred about 9 o'clock on the night of Sunday, June 30, 1946, at the inter
Pierce v. Youngpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931-10-28 · Published · cited 0× · 43 S.W.2d 455
FLY, C. J. Appellant sued appellee on a written contract for $135 concerning certain advertising matter consisting of 500 “Polychrome Blue Thermometers.” The contract provided for payment of the amount in Menard county. The contract was in' the form of an order for the thermometers, and was signed by Harry J. Young. He did not describe himself as agent for S. J. Young, but ordered the goods to be delivered to Young’s Music S
Neel v. Youngpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 78 Ga. 342
Jackson, Chief Justice. The question made'in the two cases argued together before us is, whether the court below committed error in counting interest upon interest at seven per cent, instead of at ten per cent, on the following stipulation in notes *343sued on: “With interest after maturity at 10 per cent, per annum, interest to be paid annually, otherwise to become p
Young v. Barkerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959-07-10 · Published · cited 22× · 342 P.2d 150; 185 Kan. 246; 1959 Kan. LEXIS 409
185 Kan. 246 (1959) 342 P.2d 150 CARL YOUNG and SARAH YOUNG, Appellants, v. CECIL E. BARKER, Appellee. No. 41,394 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 10, 1959. Manford Holly, of Wichita, argued the cause, and A.D. Weiskirch and William C. Farmer, both of Wichita, were with him on the briefs for appellants.
Bramlett v. Youngpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956-06-21 · Published · cited 30× · 93 S.E.2d 873; 229 S.C. 519; 1956 S.C. LEXIS 81
229 S.C. 519 (1956) 93 S.E.2d 873 WILLIE E. BRAMLETT, N.A. HACK, THOMAS W. BUTLER and C.J. HUDSON, Individually, and as members of McCarter Presbyterian Church, bring this action not only for themselves but also as representatives of all other members of said church, Respondents v. E.W. YOUNG and MANNING JONES, individually, and (1) as ruling elders of McCarter Independent Presbyterian Church, not only for themselves but a
Young v. Fainpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 121 Ga. 737; 49 S.E. 731; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 57
Fish, P. J. A peace-warrant proceeding was instituted by Fannie May Young against Mrs. Julia A. Young, before J. G. Bloodworth, notary public and ex-officio justice of the peace of Fulton county, which resulted in the magistrate passing an order requiring that the defendant therein should give bond, in the sum of two hundred dollars, to keep the peace, and that in default thereof she should be committed to the common jail of the
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928-01-23 · Published · cited 8× · 4 S.W.2d 828; 222 Mo. App. 144; 1928 Mo. App. LEXIS 163
* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Sales, 35Cyc, p. 290, n. 22; p. 543, n. 85. This suit is based upon a contract involving the alleged sale and purchase of a penny-in-the-slot weighing machine. Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of weighing machines with its principal office at 9 West 61st street in New York City. Defendant is a druggist engaged in business at 3548 Indiana avenue, Kansas City,
Young v. Harrisonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1855-01-15 · Published · cited 10× · 17 Ga. 30
*36 By the Court Starnes, J. delivering the opinion. [1.] The main question, in this case, arises on the point made as to the proper measure of recovery for the land which has been taken from the intestate, whom these defendants in error represent, by the Irwinton Bridge Company, as a site for one of the ab
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991-02-05 · Published · cited 13× · 756 F. Supp. 55; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1638; 1991 WL 15133
756 F.Supp. 55 (1991) Richard G. BOYLE, Plaintiff, v. MERRIMACK BANCORP, INC.; Peter Hollingworth; Francis G. McDougal, Jr.; Harold E. Clayton, Jr.; Neil M. Blume; Victor F. Clark; David J. Fenton, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-11260-Y. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 5, 1991. *56 Glen DeValerio, Berman, DeV
Harris v. Flukepublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2022-01-19 · Published · cited 1× · 969 N.W.2d 717; 2022 S.D. 5
#29220-aff-PJD 2022 S.D. 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** CHADWICK WILLIAM HARRIS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. BRENT FLUKE, Warden of the Mike Durfee State Prison, Respondent and Appellee. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 923 F.2d 53; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1544; 1991 WL 3328
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This is a diversity action in contract. Appellants, an injured worker and his wife, settled with two insurers for $750,000. Appellants pledged in the settlement agreement that they would not settle with a third insurer unless the third agreed to release its claims against the first two. The appellants breached their agreement, settling with the third ins
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2025-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00453-CV Christopher HUGHES, Appellant v. Christina HUGHES,
Carey v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979-05-17 · Published · cited 1× · 389 N.E.2d 357; 180 Ind. App. 516
389 N.E.2d 357 (1979) Wilbur CAREY, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 2-1278A438. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. May 17, 1979. *358 James A. Neel, Davis Neel & Headlee, Indianapolis, for appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Gordon R. Medlic
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997-05-06 · Published · cited 0× · 964 F. Supp. 341; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10520; 1997 WL 254219
964 F.Supp. 341 (1997) Carl F. BONNER, John C. Lessley, J. Richard Cottingham, Barney Hale, Jerry Hyman, Steven Kimmett, Robert H. Neel, Thomas M. Schipporeit, Michael W. Schrum, Earl H. Scott, Thomas A. Tye, and Brian C. Warsham, Plaintiffs, v. LAW COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Bruce C. Coles, John Y. Williams, Clifford M. Kirtland, Andrew J. Young, Walter T. Kiser, James I. Dangar, Clarence D. Zimmerman, Frank B. Lockridge, Robert B. Fooshee, Peter D.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-02-01 · Published · cited 23× · 167 F.3d 420; 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1187; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459
167 F.3d 420 132 Ed. Law Rep. 300 Matthew CURRY; Jessie Roos; Amber Harpel; AaronFagerness; Grant Buse; Plaintiffs - Appellees,v.REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA; William E. Hogan,II; Patricia B. Spence; Robert S. Bergland; Julie A.Bleyhl; Warren C. Larson; David R. Metzen; H. Bryan Neel,III; Michael O'Keefe; William R. Peterson; Jessica J.Phillips; Thomas R. Reagan; Ma
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2025-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00160-CV EOG RESOURCES, INC., Appellant v. CNH ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, LTD., Appellee