Cases

Opinion issued August 28, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— Nos. 01-13-00652-CR, 01-13-00653-CR, & 01-13-00654-CR ——————————— NOAH LEE NAVA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00503-CR ___________________________ CLIFFORD LEVIENE POWELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 9 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1495687 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

305 F.Supp.2d 682 (2004) In the Matter of THE EXTRADITION OF CARLOS NAVA GONZALEZ No. MISC. M-02-003. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, McAllen Division. January 8, 2004. *683 Luis A Martinez, Office of U S Attorney, McAllen, for United States of America, plaintiff. Oscar Alvarez, Attorney at Law, McAllen, for in the Matte

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge (concurring): I concur. I have no difficulty in finding probable cause for this search. The uncontroverted evidence, including the facts as stipulated by the parties, is that on the morning in question a tip was received from an informer, who had proved himself reliable, that “before too long” a blue-green Pontiac with California license number HGP 761, and containing marijuana, w

BARRON, Circuit Judge. In this case, a group of construction-industry employers’ associations and employers (“employers”) seek relief from a broad category of enforcement actions that may be brought under the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law (“ESTL”), Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 148C. Specifically, the employers contend that the ESTL “is preempted” by Section 301 of the Labor-Man

Matter of Hugee v Gadsden (2018 NY Slip Op 05844) Matter of Hugee v Gadsden 2018 NY Slip Op 05844 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., RICKMAN and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules December

WILL, Senior District Judge. This is an appeal from the dismissal of plaintiff’s case with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) and the denial of plaintiff’s motion for a trial continuance. We reverse and remand. I. BACKGROUND. William Lowe is a thirty-eight year old resident of East Chicago, Indiana who works as a substitute teacher there. He filed suit on March 16, 1988 alleging

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules April 26

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE Plaintiffs Keri Van Lengen and Deborah Nava (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed this putative class action against Defendants General Mills, Inc., General Mills Sales, Inc., General Mills Operations, LLC, Roxanne Ornelas, and Does 1-50, (collectively “Defendants”) setting forth five claims for relief: (1) violation of California’s Unfair Busines

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49980 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, November 2022 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: March 10, 2023

PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, McClanahan, Powell, and Kelsey, JJ., and Millette, S.J. RYAN AUSTIN COLLINS OPINION BY v. Record No. 151277 CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals e

OPINION James T. Campbell, Justice Through four issues appellant Lonnie Douglas Davy appeals, his sentences for possession of methamphetamine and tampering with physical evidence. Three of his *749issues deal with the State’s proof of punishment enhancements; the fourth addresses a statement made by the trial judge. We will overrule each of appella

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00033-CR Michael Marrero, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2013 CR 0098, HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

507 F.3d 1125 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. TIMLEY, Defendant, Patrick W. Peters, Claimant-Appellant. No. 07-1627. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 2007. Filed: November 15, 2007. *1126 *1127 Patr

Affirmed and Opinion Filed April 24, 2015 Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00281-CR JOE BARRY FERGUSON, Appellant V. THE STAT

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00112-CR Joel Contreras-Aguilar, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-10-0442-B, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00149-CR Jose Salvador Aguilar, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2016CR1020, THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00036-CR Lars Erik ITZO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01193-CR LEONARD DESHAWN SCOTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District