⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Natl City Bank v. Hurley”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-07-25 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 Ohio 3261
[Cite as LaSalle Bank Natl. Assn. v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-3261.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL : ASSOCIATION Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 25822 v. : T.C. NO. 08CV6242 CHARLES BROWN, et al. : (Civil appeal from
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-09-11 · Published · cited 2× · 2025 Ohio 3274
[Cite as 1900 Capital Trust II, by US Bank Trust Natl. Assn. v. House-Redd, 2025-Ohio-3274.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 1900 CAPITAL TRUST II, BY US : BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : Plaintiff-Appellee, :
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 2× · 2013 Ohio 5848
[Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Santisi, 2013-Ohio-5848.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST : OPINION COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR FIRST FRANKLIN MORTAGE LOAN TRUST : 2006-FF11, CASE NO. 201
Ohio Supreme Court · 2020-12-22 · Published · cited 3× · 163 Ohio St. 3d 409; 170 N.E.3d 832; 2020 Ohio 6802
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Cincinnati v. Fourth Natl. Realty, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-6802.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-02-20 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 Ohio 1459
[Cite as Wells Fargo Bank v. Perkins, 2014-Ohio-1459.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-318 (C.P.C. No. 09CVE-08-12771) v. :
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002-06-21 · Published · cited 34× · 801 A.2d 1158; 353 N.J. Super. 145
801 A.2d 1158 (2002) 353 N.J. Super. 145 Ann BAKER and Barbara Hausleiter, Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. The NATIONAL STATE BANK, (a/k/a CoreStates, its Successor-In-Interest), Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Leo Ahern, as Regional Manager and individually, and Arthur Campbell, as Executive Vice-President, and individually, Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey
Hurley v. Noonepublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964-03-04 · Published · cited 12× · 196 N.E.2d 905; 347 Mass. 182; 1964 Mass. LEXIS 737
347 Mass. 182 (1964) 196 N.E.2d 905 FRANK C. HURLEY, administrator, vs. MARGARET M. NOONE & another (and a companion case). Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. January 10, 1964. March 4, 1964. Present: WILKINS, C.J., CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, & REARDON, JJ. Henry Wise for Frank C. Hurley, administrator.
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013-09-24 · Published · cited 14× · 434 Md. 381; 75 A.3d 952; 2013 WL 5311223; 2013 Md. LEXIS 593
McDonald j. The vast majority of states, including Maryland, follow what is known as the “American Rule” on the allocation of the costs of litigation — that is, each party bears its own costs, including attorneys’ fees, regardless of the outcome.1 This is in contrast to the practice in Great Britain — and most other legal systems in the Western world — which follows what is known as the “English Ru
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946-12-09 · Published · cited 20× · 198 S.W.2d 710; 355 Mo. 860; 1946 Mo. LEXIS 514
Action for money had and received. The trial court directed verdict for plaintiff for $31,527.98, including interest. Verdict was returned as directed and judgment entered thereon. Motion for a new trial was overruled and defendant appealed. March 14, 1939, the J.J. Pryor Construction Company was awarded the contract for the construction of the second section of the Brookside sewer in Kansas City. Construction was completed July 14th; accepted July 19th; taxbills in the sum of $132,015
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 184 So. 615; 183 Miss. 385; 1938 Miss. LEXIS 254
The state tax collector filed his bill in the chancery court to recover from appellee, the First National Bank *Page 402 in Meridian, certain taxes alleged to be due the municipality of Meridian, its separate school district state and county. The cause was removed on application of the bank to the federal district court there upon the pleadings, a judgment was entered in favor of the bank. The tax collector prosecuted an appeal to the Circuit Court of App
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949-04-11 · Published · cited 2× · 219 S.W.2d 312; 358 Mo. 1199; 8 A.L.R. 2d 435; 1949 Mo. LEXIS 576
Action to recover the amounts evidenced by three checks drawn on and payable to defendant bank. It is charged that the checks were paid and charged against plaintiffs' account and the proceeds thereof disposed of without plaintiffs' authority or consent. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs for $8084.88 (including interest) and defendant has appealed. Error is assigned on the giving and refusal of instructions and the exclusion of evidence. Plaintiffs are co-trustees of an express
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982-08-23 · Published · cited 23× · 439 N.E.2d 311; 14 Mass. App. Ct. 326; 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1430
14 Mass. App. Ct. 326 (1982) 439 N.E.2d 311 HAROLD J. KANAVOS vs. HANCOCK BANK AND TRUST COMPANY. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. May 12, 1982. August 23, 1982. Present: DREBEN, ROSE, & KASS, JJ. Nicholas A. Abraham for the plaintiff. James R. DeGiacomo for the defendant. KASS, J. At the
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938-05-03 · Published · cited 8× · 116 S.W.2d 11; 342 Mo. 428; 1938 Mo. LEXIS 563
* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1937, August 26, 1937; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled December 17, 1937; motion to transfer to Court en Banc filed; motion overruled at May Term, 1938, May 3, 1938. Plaintiff, respondent, sued defendant, appellant, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the city. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plai
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947-04-21 · Published · cited 7× · 202 S.W.2d 25; 356 Mo. 454; 1947 Mo. LEXIS 585
Action under the penalty section of our death statute, Sec. 3652 R.S. 1939, Mo. R.S.A., Sec. 3652, to recover $10,000 for the[27] alleged wrongful death of plaintiff's husband who was killed in a collision between the car which deceased was operating and defendant's bus. Plaintiff (respondent) obtained a judgment for $7500 and defendant appealed. The appeal lies to the supreme court because the constitutional validity of the statute upon which the cause is based is challenged
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 137 S.W.2d 571; 345 Mo. 1059; 1940 Mo. LEXIS 380
This is an action for specific performance of an alleged contract to convey real estate. The trial court found in favor of defendant Trust Company, and also in favor of the individual defendants (claiming title as bona fide purchasers) on their cross-bill affirmatively seeking adjudication of the title. Plaintiffs have appealed from the court's decree dismissing their bill. Plaintiffs' second amended petition, upon which the case was tried, alleged that Gottlieb (George) J. Stocker, at
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982-05-17 · Published · cited 16× · 434 N.E.2d 1297; 13 Mass. App. Ct. 538
13 Mass. App. Ct. 538 (1982) 434 N.E.2d 1297 COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX & another[1] vs. CITY OF NEWTON (and a companion case[2]). Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. March 12, 1982. May 17, 1982. Present: GRANT, GREANEY, & SMITH, JJ. Ouida C.M. Young, Assistant City Solicitor, for the city of Newto
Texas Supreme Court · 1935-12-11 · Published · cited 44× · 93 S.W.2d 143; 127 Tex. 158; 89 S.W.2d 394; 1935 Tex. LEXIS 433
Suit was by the City National Bank of Wichita Falls, defendant in error, against Wichita Royalty Company and E. E. Scannell, as its Trustee and individually. Recovery was sought by the Bank of a balance alleged to be due on two notes, one *Page 162 executed, and the other endorsed, by the Royalty Company, together with foreclosure of liens on certain properties. The Royalty Company, through E. E. Scannell, Trustee, pleaded various defenses and filed its c
Texas Supreme Court · 1948-11-10 · Published · cited 9× · 214 S.W.2d 934; 147 Tex. 193; 1948 Tex. LEXIS 430
Petitioner, Strickland Transportation Company, a corporation, operating a motor truck line, employed one John W. Akard as its commission agent in Memphis, Texas. His duties included picking up and delivering freight transported by petitioner; he was authorized to accept checks of customers payable to petitioner for freight charges; but he was not authorized to indorse or cash these checks, only certain officers of the petitioner being so authorized. Akard served as petitioner's employe
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934-04-02 · Published · cited 8× · 72 S.W.2d 191; 228 Mo. App. 511; 1934 Mo. App. LEXIS 66
The petition in this case is in seven counts, each of which is based upon a contractor's bond for the faithful performance of the several contracts of defendant, Edgar V. Koch, contractor with the city of Springfield, for the construction of certain street improvement, therein stated. The appellant, V.E. Koch, purports to be the surety on the bonds of Edgar Koch, his codefendant, which bonds are the subject-matter of this action. The relator, Harry G. Horton, is the materialman
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926-05-21 · Published · cited 5× · 284 S.W. 482; 314 Mo. 288; 1926 Mo. LEXIS 896
On August 26, 1922, the American Press Company, a corporation, filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, an action against the city of St. Louis aforesaid, to recover certain rent alleged to be due it. The petition alleges that on April 23, 1915, the parties aforesaid entered into an indenture of lease, whereby plaintiff let unto defendant, for the period beginning May 1, 1915, and ending April 30, 1917, at a rental of two hundred and fifty doll