Cases

Filed 5/17/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ABDU LKADER AL SHIKHA, B321882 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV14928) v. LYFT, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los

MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents PART ONE Summary of Case 446 I. Contentions of Parties.446 II. Factual Background.447 III. Law 448 IV. Procedures. rfX ZO V. Conclusions of Fact and Law. ^ 4^

GORDON McCLOUD, J. *1209 ¶ 1 The United States Supreme Court has tasked us with deciding whether the Washington courts violated the United States Constitution's guaranty of religious neutrality in our prior adjudication of this case. We have fully reviewed the record with this issue in

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court February 21, 2017.] Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 The State of Washington bars discrimination in “public . . . accommodation [s]” on the basis of “sexual orientation.” RCW 49.60.215(1) (Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD)). Barronelle Stutzman owns and operates a place of public accommodation in our state: Arlene’s Flowers Inc. Stutzman and her public business, Arlen

271 F.Supp.2d 435 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. 99 CV 3999(JBW), 99 CV 7037(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 21, 2003. *436 *437 *438

WERDEGAR, J. I respectfully dissent. I cannot accept the majority’s conclusion that plaintiffs are statutorily barred from suing the maker of the semiautomatic assault weapon used to massacre the victims in this case. Neither the letter of Civil Code section 1714.4 nor the legislative policy it embodies bars this action for negligence in the marketing of a firearm. *49

Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Romolo Colantone, Efrain Alvarez, and Jose Anthony Irizarry (collectively, "the Plaintiffs") brought suit against Defendants City of New York and the New York Police Department-License Division (collectively, "the City"), challenging a provision of a New York City licensing scheme, Title 38, Chap

89 Cal.Rptr.2d 146 (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 500 Marilyn MERRILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NAVEGAR, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. A079863. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. September 29, 1999. As Modified October 28, 1999. Review Granted January 19, 2000.

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge FERGUSON. TASHIMA, Circuit Judge. In 1988, Appellee Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (CU), published a story in its magazine Consumer Reports, in which it rated the Suzuki Samurai “Not Acceptable” based on its propensity to roll over during accident avoidance tests. Since that time, CU has publicly referred to the negative Samurai rating in various

ORDER The opinion and dissenting opinion, filed June 25, 2002, slip op. at 9009, 292 F.3d 1192, are withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion, concurring opinion, and dissenting opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, with Judge Ferguson recommending that the petition be granted. The full court was advised of the petitio

56 N.J. 288 (1970) 266 A.2d 284 LAWRENCE J. McLAUGHLIN AND OLGA McLAUGHLIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROVA FARMS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND HERMAN SCHULZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 16, 1970. Decided June 22, 1970. *293 Mr. Nicholas R. Rapua

Filed 1/13/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ISAAC FAVOR, Petitioner, E075340 v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI20000446) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN OPINION BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent; TH

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1061 JOSEPH R. CAPEN; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANDREA JOY CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This high-profile case involves a constitutional challenge to a Massachusetts law proscribing the sale, transfer, and possession of certain semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines (LCMs). See Mass.

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 406–446 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 14, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

MORITZ, Circuit Judge. The underlying issues in these appeals are significant and concern the extent to which the Second Amendment limits Colorado’s power to regulate firearms and large-capacity magazines. But preliminarily, we first grapple with a more fundamental question: the extent to which Article III of the United States Constitution limits our power — and the district court’s power — to hear the plaintiffs’

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASON WOLFORD; ALISON No. 23-16164 WOLFORD; ATOM KASPRZYCKI; HAWAII FIREARMS COALITION, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00265- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LEK-WRP v. OPINION ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii,

221 Argued and submitted November 9, 2022, reversed and remanded February 15, 2023 For a Judicial Examination and Judgment of the Court as to the Regularity, Legality, Validity and Effect of the Columbia County Second Amendment Sanctuary Ordinance BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Petitioner-Respon

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 20-35391 CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF D.C. No. DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; 2:20-cv-00111- STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF RAJ ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF OPINION MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; S