Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1608 NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HIGHBOURNE FOUNDATION; JOHN R. BEHRMANN; NANCY BEHRMANN, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge AGEE joined. *346 ON REHEARING DIAZ, Circuit Judge: On remand following an earlier appeal in this ease, a bankruptcy court ruled that the non-debtor

663 F.3d 704 (2011) John R. BEHRMANN; Nancy Behrmann; Highbourne Foundation; Maurice Townsley; Theresa Townsley; Townsley Family Foundation, The; Dolores F. Anderson, a/k/a Dodie Anderson; Dodie Anderson Foundation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, Incorporated; Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-2015. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Ci

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge. Before the Court are multiple appeals from decisions of the bankruptcy court. In the first appeal, Civil Action No. I:13cv01180, Appellants John and Nancy Behrmann (“the Behrmanns”), who donated funds to Appellee National Heritage Foundation, Inc. (“NHF” or “Debtor”), appeal the bankruptcy court’s decision denying their Renewed Motion for Leav

MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN F. KENNEY, Bankruptcy Judge. On remand from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, this Court is called upon to set forth specific findings of fact — if the *219record so permits — in support of the Release, Exculpation and Injunction Provisions set forth in the Debtor’s Fourth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization. The

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 204–278 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM OPINION Brian F. Kenney, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Memorandum Opinion is issued in support of the Order Granting the Chapter 11 Trustee’s Motion for Entry of Order: (A) Approving Sale of Assets Free and Clear of Liens, Claims, and Encumbrances;-, (B) Approving Assumption and Assignment of Executory Contracts, (C) Approving Settlement of .Claims; and (D) Prohibiting Assertion of Estate

MEMORANDUM OPINION Kevin R. Huennekens, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On August 3, 2015 (the “Petition Date”), Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., and 1491 of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) commenced these bankruptcy cases by each filing a separate voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy ■ Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court fo

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul M. Black, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Amended Chapter 12 Plan of Reorganization (“Amended Plan”) of the Debtor, Terry Properties, LLC (the “Debtor”), and the objections thereto filed by Farm Credit of the Virginias, ACA (“Farm Credit”), Southern States Marion Cooperative, Inc. (“Southern States”), and the Chapter 12 Trustee (the “Trustee”).

MEMORANDUM OPINION Kevin R. Huennekens, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On June 7, 2015 (the “Petition Date”), Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (“HDL”) and two of its subsidiaries (the “Debtors”)1 commenced these bankruptcy cases by filing separate voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”)

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING CONFIRMATION, VACATING ORDERS AND REQUIRING THE APPOINTMENT OF A TRUSTEE “It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary. ” - ‘The Trial’ Franz Kafka ROBERT A. GORDON, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. Preliminary Statement The central question to be answered by this Opinion is

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <