⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “National Engineering v. 3301 Associates Inc”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-05-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-200C (Filed Under Seal: April 27, 2018) (Reissued for Publication: May 8, 2018)* ************************************* NATIONAL GOVERNMENT * SERVICES, INC., * Pre-Award Bid Protest; Section 1874A of * the Social Security Act;
District Court, C.D. California · 2006-08-31 · Published · cited 1× · 453 F. Supp. 2d 1153; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73831; 2006 WL 2789870
453 F.Supp.2d 1153 (2006) H. Ray LAHR, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, Defendants. No. CV 03-8023 AHM (RZx). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 31, 2006. *1154 *1155 *
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 26-cv-564 (CRC) NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Partially-Redacted Version of ECF No. 24) Only a few m
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 26-cv-564 (CRC) NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Only a few months before the Artemis II mission opened the door to future lun
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-07-03 · Published · cited 22× · 254 F.3d 226; 349 U.S. App. D.C. 149; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14811
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. TATEL, Circuit Judge: The Federal Communications Commission exempts noncommercial educational entities from participating in auctions for broadcast licenses when they apply for channels within the portion of the spectrum reserved for them, but not when they apply for channels in the u
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983-12-19 · Published · cited 42× · 721 F.2d 767; 14 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20172; 20 ERC (BNA) 1159; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14396; 20 ERC 1158
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a denial of preliminary injunctive relief by the District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. Appellants1 seek to prohibit the release of funds by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), the expenditure of funds already released, and any other action in furtherance of the constr
District Court, D. Delaware · 1980-05-13 · Published · cited 11× · 491 F. Supp. 290; 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17308
491 F.Supp. 290 (1980) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Puerto Rican Civil Rights League, Inc., Older Americans Coalition, Wilmington United Neighborhoods, Brandywine Trinity United Methodist Church, Raymond W. Brown, Maria Galindez, for herself and as parent and guardian for her minor children Reynaldo Galindez and Pedro Galindez, Milagro Quinones, Denise Smokes, Maria Miran, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situat
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988-11-02 · Published · cited 47× · 855 F.2d 1106
855 F.2d 1106 PAN EASTERN EXPLORATION CO. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.,Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees,v.HUFO OILS, et al., Defendants-Appellees,andBilly Mack Gideon, Canadian Commercial Bank and FirstNational Bank in Albuquerque, Defendants-AppelleesCross-Appellants.PAN EASTERN EXPLORATION CO. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.,Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees,v.MITCHELL ENERGY & DEVELOPMENT COR
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991-09-06 · Published · cited 3× · 943 F.2d 1320
943 F.2d 1320 291 U.S.App.D.C. 377 WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Amoco ProductionCompany, Southern California Gas Company, Panhandle EasternPipe Line Company and Texas Eastern TransmissionCorporation, Independent Oil and Gas Association ofPennsylvania, Union Pacific Resources Company, ARCO Oil an
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 23-2128, 24-1418, 24-1575 (Filed Under Seal: July 24, 2025) Reissued: August 14, 2025 ∗ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MAYVIN, INC., et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 270× · 696 F.3d 254; 2012 WL 4483899; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20342
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Notwithstanding the majority’s thoughtful and well-crafted opinion, I respectfully dissent as I would reverse the District Court’s order that it entered following its opinion reported at ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton Corp., 769 F.Supp.2d 684 (D.Del. 2011), denying Eaton’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Although the majority opinion recites in detail the factual
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 24-1057, 24-1077, 24-1144, 24-1219, 24-1398, 24-1433, 24-1461 (Filed: 21 January 2025) * *************************************** MVL USA, Inc., et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Nos. 24-1057, v. *
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 1× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 1116; 2016 A.M.C. 205; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157727; 2015 WL 7451162
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY. JUDGMENT Alan C. Kay, Sr. United States District Judge For the following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’- Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doe. No. 50.) Because the Court concludes that the United States Coast Guard Commercial Diving Operations regulations do not apply to Defendants’ Kampachi Vessels, the Court grants judgment in Defendants’ favor
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-2275C (Filed Under Seal: May 4, 2022) (Reissued for Publication: May 11, 2022) ) SEVENTH DIMENSION, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
Sierra Club v. FERCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 17, 2025 Decided August 1, 2025 No. 24-1199 SIERRA CLUB AND PUBLIC CITIZEN, PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT MEXICO PACIFIC LIMITED LLC AND SAGUARO CONNECTOR PIPELINE, L.L.C, INTERVENORS
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-05-06 · Published · cited 0× · 131 Fed. Cl. 653; 2017 WL 1842826
Post-Award Bid Protest; Scope of Work; Work Assignment. OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. Plaintiff, Tetra Tech, Inc., protests the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) issuance of work assignment number 2-10, Long-term Stormwater and Wastewater Planning Technical Assistance (the “Stormwater Work Assignment”) to interve
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2024-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ADVANCED SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY INC., No. 23-2201 C Plaintiff, (Filed: November 4, 2024) v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Hamish Hume, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Brendan Jordan, Civil Division, Uni
Com. v. Bonnett, P.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-09-22 · Published · cited 129× · 239 A.3d 1096; 2020 Pa. Super. 231
J-S38037-20 2020 PA Super 231 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : PRESTON DAQUEN BONNETT :
Com. v. Bonnett, P.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-09-22 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 Pa. Super. 231
J-S38037-20 2020 PA Super 231 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : PRESTON DAQUEN BONNETT :
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOAH T. BYRD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-1512 (TJK) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION While serving in the Navy for over six years, Noah Byrd worked mainly in aircraft mainte- nance as an Aviation Machinist’s Mate. In 2008, howeve