Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

755 F.Supp.2d 857 (2010) In re NATIONAL CENTURY FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., INVESTMENT LITIGATION. Case No. 2:03-md-1565. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 13, 2010. *860 OPINION AND ORDER ON THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO CREDIT SUISSE'S LIABILITY TO THE NOTEHOLDER PLAINTIFFS UNDER SE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARTER PAGE, § § No. 79, 2021 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S20C-07-030 OATH INC., § § D

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Bench Trial on Plaintiffs’ First Through Fourth Claims for Relief, and Brief in Support, filed February 17, 2017 (Doc. 253)(“Motion for Bench Trial”). The Court held a hearing on April 26-27, 2017, The primary issues are whether: (i) the Plaintiffs’ breach-of-fiduciary-

The jury found that, as a consequence of the merger and JELD-WEN's conduct in 2014 and thereafter, competition was substantially lessened in the doorskin market and that, as a result, Steves sustained injuries of the type that the antitrust laws were designed to prevent. Thereupon, the jury awarded Steves $58,632,454.00 in antitrust damages which, when trebled as required by statute, amounts to antitrust damages in the amount of $175,897,362.00. The jury al

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States District Judge This is a putative class action brought against two affiliated trucking companies by drivers once associated with those companies. Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay allege that Defendants C.R. England, Inc. and Opportunity Leasing, Inc. developed a fraudulent plan to induce thousands of people to enroll in England’s dr

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: In these actions, Plaintiffs claim that certain paintings they purchased from Defendant Knoedler Gallery, LLC (“Knoedler”) are forgeries. In addition to Knoedler, all Plaintiffs name the following as defendants: 8-31 Holdings Inc. (“8-31”), Knoedler’s. sole member; Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s managing member and the owner of 8-31 H

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.

787 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2011) Rochelle MANDELBAUM, individually and as executrix of The Estate of Donald Mandelbaum; Giuseppe Santinello; Anne J. Del Casino, and Robert and Stephanie Halio, on behalf of themselves and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FISERV, INC., Fiserv Trust Company, Retirement Accounts, Inc., NTC & Co. LLP, Trust Industrial Bank, and Lincoln Trust Company, Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 09-

ACCEPTED 01-14-00880-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/25/2015 3:28:27 PM

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. In this case, the plaintiff T-Mobile Northeast LLC (“T-Mobile”) alleges that the Town of Islip (“the Town”) and the Planning Board of the Town of Islip (“the Board” and together with the Town, “the Defendants”) denied its request for a special use permit to construct a public utility wireless telecommunication facility, in violation of the Telecommun

OPINION SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. I. Introduction and Summary................................................372 II. Background.............................................................374 A. The Alleged Fraud Summarized.......................................374 B. Pre-Settlement Procedural History................................

*880 OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. The Amended Original Complaint (instrument # 12) in above referenced cause alleges (1) breach of a Master Services Contract (“MSC”), and of Work Releases pursuant to it, to provide barges, tug boats, and other equipment to separate crude oil from water in Plaintiff BP Exploration & Produc

Opinion ZARELLA, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the nonunion plaintiffs, Electrical Contractors, Inc. (ECI), and six of its individual employees,1 have standing to challenge prebid specifications requiring the successful bidder on two state financed school construction projects2 in the city of Hartford to perform all project

*573MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In January 2009, Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (“Heartland”) publicly disclosed that hackers had breached its computer systems and obtained access to confidential payment-card information for over one hundred million consumers. Consumers and financial institutions filed suits across the

826 F.Supp.2d 478 (2011) In re REFCO INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Kenneth M. Krys, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard Aaron, et al., Defendants. Nos. 07 MDL 1902 (JSR), 08 Civ. 7416 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 30, 2011. *487 ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, Dist

515 F.Supp.2d 228 (2007) EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Insurance Company of North America, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, North River Insurance Company, One-Beacon America Insurance Company, and United States Fire Insurance Company, Defendants. C.A. No. 02-53 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. September 26, 2007.

592 F.Supp.2d 608 (2009) The PENSION COMMITTEE OF the UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC, Citco Fund Services (Curacao) N.V., The Citco Group Limited, International Fund Services (Ireland) Limited, PricewaterhouseCoopers (Netherland Antilles), John W. Bendall, Jr., Richard Geist, Anthony Stocks, Kieran Conroy, and Declan Quilligan, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9016 (SAS).</