Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nathanael E Smith, II”
State of Tennessee v. Nathanael Littlepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 1, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NATHANAEL LITTLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Chester County No. 11-CR-13 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2011-02199-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 28, 2013 A Chester County jury convicted appellant, Nathanael Little, on count 1 for selling more than one
Smith v. Volkswagen Southtownepublic domain
2024 UT App 33 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LOIS SMITH, Appellee, v. VOLKSWAGEN SOUTHTOWNE, INC., Appellant. Opinion No. 20220957-CA Filed March 14, 2024 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Barry G. Lawrence
Daniel Binion v. Brandon Brinkley, Nathanael Friend, and American Medical Response of Texas, Inc.public domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-121-CV DANIEL BINION APPELLANT V. BRANDON BRINKLEY, APPELLEES NATHANAEL FRIEND, AND AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE OF TEXAS, INC. ------------
Daniel Binion v. Brandon Brinkley, Nathanael Friend, and American Medical Response of Texas, Inc.public domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-121-CV DANIEL BINION APPELLANT V. <
Smith v. Volkswagen Southtownepublic domain
2022 UT 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH LOIS SMITH, Appellant & Cross Appellee, v. VOLKSWAGEN SOUTHTOWNE, INC., Appellee & Cross Appellant. No. 20190382 Heard February 10, 2021 Filed June 30, 2022
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-187 Filed: June 28, 2019 Reissued: July 9, 20191 ) TELOS IDENTITY MANAGEMENT ) SOLUTIONS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, )
Matter of Kameron R. (Alexis R.)public domain
Matter of Kameron R. (Alexis R.) (2023 NY Slip Op 06678) Matter of Kameron R. (Alexis R.) 2023 NY Slip Op 06678 Decided on December 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Dillard v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1898 Filed: March 31, 2023 ) NATHANAEL DILLARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) )
2m Research Services, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1638 Filed: March 23, 2020 Reissued: April 22, 20201 ) 2M RESEARCH SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
The Modern Sportsman, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-449 Filed: October 23, 2019 ) THE MODERN SPORTSMAN, LLC, et ) al., ) ) Fifth Amendment Takings Claim; Plaintiff, ) Informal Rulemaking; Police Power;
2m Research Services, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1638 C Filed: July 25, 2018 Reissued: September 6, 20181 ) 2M RESEARCH SERVICES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
Picard v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.public domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: Irving H. Picard (the “Trustee”), trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) and of the bankruptcy estate of Bernard L. Madoff, initiated adversary proceedings seeking to block the settlement of three lawsuits, none of which involved BLMIS or the Madoff estate as a party. The suits in question were brought by and on behalf of investors in so-called “feeder funds”
Daniel Farrell v. Boeing Employees Credit Unionpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FARRELL, No. 19-16130 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:16-cv-02711- NC BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION; MOORE BREWER & WOLFE, a Professional Corporation, OPINI
Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interiorpublic domain
ORDER DENYING STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 29) ORDER GRANTING NORTH FORK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 36) ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 40) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY (Doc. 28) ANTH
State v. Highpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-1170 Filed: 2 June 2020 Gaston County, Nos. 02 CRS 6513, 02 CRS 6524 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. NATHANAEL HIGH, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 17 June 2019 by Judge David Phillips in Gaston County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 28 April 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorne
Mitchell v. Parkerpublic domain
ORDER Timothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Sergeant O.B. Parker and Officer Aaron Dowling’s motion for partial summary judgment on the claims filed against them by Plaintiff Keith Dashaun Mitchell [29-1]. Defendants also argue that partial summary judgment is warranted on nearly all the remaining claims stemming
State v. Highpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-1170 Filed: 2 June 2020 Gaston County, Nos. 02 CRS 6513, 02 CRS 6524 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. NATHANAEL HIGH, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 17 June 2019 by Judge David Phillips in Gaston County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 28 April 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorne
Brown v. Mid-Am. Apartments, LPpublic domain
ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *597Before the Court are Plaintiff Nathanael Brown's ("Brown") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 31), Defendants Mid-America Apartments, LP and Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s (collectively, "MAA") Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 86), and the parties' responsive briefing to each.