Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ANTHONY J. TRENGA, District Judge. Plaintiff Noah Nathan (“Nathan”) claims that because of his child-care duties, defendants Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Takeda”) discriminated against him and subjected him to a hostile work environment, and also retaliated against him for complaining about h

601 S.W.2d 128 (1980) Dale DODSON, Trustee and Murray Kelin, Trustee, Appellants, v. Stuart L. McCOY and Patti R. McCoy, Appellees. No. 17578. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). May 22, 1980. *129 Lackshin & Nathan, Bernus Wm. Fischman, Vincent Bustamante, Houston, for appellants. Holland, Abernathy,

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00070-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF NATHAN LEVI LAVENDER AND CANDICE MARIE LAVENDER AND IN THE INTEREST OF H.L.L., J.G.L., AND I.K.L., CHILDREN On Appeal from the County Court at Law Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 21D0251-CCL Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Ra

221 S.W.3d 293 (2007) Mark HAIRE and Karen Haire, Appellants, v. NATHAN WATSON COMPANY and Fugro South, Inc., Appellees. No. 2-06-107-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 22, 2007. Rehearing Overruled March 29, 2007. *295 Law Offices of A. Scott Campbell and A. Scott Campbell, McKinney, TX, for App

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00299-CR NATHAN COLLINS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

02-09-299-CR COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS<

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 767 OPINION In two issues, appellant Kevin Clark appeals the trial court's decision to deny his motion for summary judgment and grant the motion for summary judgment of appellee Cotten Schmidt, L.L.P. f/k/a Kirkley Schmidt Cotten, L.L.P. (Cotten Schmidt). We affirm in part and

218 S.W.3d 797 (2007) NATHAN A. WATSON COMPANY, Appellant and Appellee, v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and Highlands Insurance COMPANY, Appellees and Appellants. No. 2-06-009-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 1, 2007. Rehearing Overruled March 1, 2007. *798 Martin Mason Stutz, LLP, and Jer

671 N.W.2d 578 (2003) In re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale C. NATHAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 77227. No. C5-02-519. Supreme Court of Minnesota. November 26, 2003. *580 Kenneth L. Jorgensen, Director, Timothy M. Burke, Senior Assistant Director, Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, MN, for

BOB McCOY, Justice, concurring. I concur in the result reached by the majority but not in every holding. The majority holds that “[w]e agree with the analysis and holdings in these cases,” referring in part to Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co., 137 Misc.2d 94, 520 N.Y.S.2d 334, 336-40 (N.Y.Civ.Ct.1987), and specifically that “the relationship of the parties was ‘functionally identical to that of a

District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 14-AA-439 NATHALIA L. BROWN, Petitioner, JUN - 9 2016 v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, & CRB-141-10 PEPCO, Intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Or

The State Department of Human Resources (State), on behalf of the mother of two minor children, sought to modify a child support order. The trial court found the mother to be in contempt of court, apparently because she had interfered with the father's exercise of his visitation rights with the minor children. The trial court refused to hear the State's petition until the mother purged herself of the contempt. The State, on behalf of the mother, appeals. The father has not favo

249 S.W.3d 392 (2008) 20801, INC., Petitioner, v. John L. PARKER, Respondent. No. 06-0574. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 26, 2007. Decided March 28, 2008. *394 David P. Andis, Gauntt & Kruppstadt, L.L.P., Woodlands, TX, for Petitioner. Philip F. Klosowsky, Law Offices of Philip F. Klosowsky, S

</

Randel Jay Riggins v. W.R. Doyle COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-256-CV RANDEL JAY RIGGINS A/K/A APPELLANTS RANDY RIGGINS A/K/A R.J.

</

409 F.Supp.2d 843 (2005) LASALLE NATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. LYNDECON, L.L.C., Craig Pastor, Tim Pastor and John Pastor, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. No. 03-CV-70482-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2005. *844 Michael P. Dilaura, Kenneth A. Natha

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-400-CV KEVIN CLARK APPELLANT V. COTTEN SCHMIDT, L.L.P. F/K/A APPELLEE KIRKLEY SCHMIDT & COTTEN, L.L.P. ------------ FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COUR

02-09-400-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRIC

NO. 07-03-0023-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MARCH 25, 2005 ______________________________ LARRY POSEY, APPELLANT V.