Cases

Powell, J.: Aaron Nash appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Patrick T. Blatchford, M.D., for Nash's failure to file a notice of claim under *567K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 12-105b(d). Nash argues the district court erred because (1) he was not required to file a notice of claim since Blatchford is an independent contractor o

MCFADDEN, Judge. Township Investments, LLC brought an action on a promissory note executed by Norman Nash and Norris Nash. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and in the order on appeal the trial court granted summary judgment to Township and denied summary judgment to the Nashes. Because there exist genuine issues of material fact about whether the Nashes received consideration for the note, summary judgment

124 S.W.3d 100 (2003) Christopher Nash POWELL v. Patsy Conley POWELL. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. January 21, 2003 Session. April 7, 2003. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied October 27, 2003. *102 Daniel Loyd Taylor and Amy R. Harden, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Christopher Nash

142 P.3d 1054 (2006) 341 Or. 306 Nancy POWELL, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Remington Powell, Respondents on Review, v. Stan BUNN, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Oregon Department Of Education and Portland Public School District No. 1J, Petitioners on Review. (CC 010403557; CA A117310; SC S52657, S52659). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

781 F.Supp.2d 706 (2011) Richard D. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. XO SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Scott Gentles, David Nash, and Trent Edwards, Defendants. No. 10 C 6813. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 1, 2011. *709 Norman James Lerum, Attorney at Law, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Th

108 P.3d 37 (2005) 198 Or. App. 21 Nancy POWELL, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Remington Powell, Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. Stan BUNN, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Oregon Department of Education, and Portland Public School District No. 1J, Appellants-Cross-Respondents. 0104-03557; A117310. Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc. A

59 P.3d 559 (2002) 185 Or.App. 334 Nancy L. POWELL, an individual, Remington Powell, a minor, through his Guardian ad Litem Nancy L. Powell, Appellants, v. Stan BUNN, individually and as Superintendent of Public Instruction; Portland Public School District No. 1J, Respondents. 9805-03567; A108090. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted November

LARRY G. SMITH, Judge. The husband seeks reversal of the following awards to the wife in a final judgment of dissolution of marriage: (1) the husband’s interest in the jointly owned marital home as lump sum alimony; (2) permanent alimony in the sum of $75.00 a month in lieu of child support for each of the three minor children, payable as each minor child for whom support is awarded reaches the age of majority, becomes self-

Matter of Parmenter v Nash (2018 NY Slip Op 07553) Matter of Parmenter v Nash 2018 NY Slip Op 07553 Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers gives a prisoner incarcerated in one State the right to demand the speedy disposition of “any untried indictment, information or *719complaint” that is the basis of a detainer lodged against him by another State. These cases present the issue whether

139 Ill. App.3d 701 (1985) 487 N.E.2d 719 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEREMIAH POWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 84-0913. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed December 30, 1985. *702 *703 G. Joseph Weller, of State App

NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts: 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Fax: (907) 264-0878 E-mail: corrections @ akcourts.us IN TH

Brewster v. Powell Bail Bonding, Inc., 2018 NCBC 74. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NEW HANOVER COUNTY 17 CVS 4462 RAUL S. BREWSTER, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON POWELL BAIL BONDING, INC.; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS LARRY JACK POWELL; JOHN E. LEONARD, JR.; and CY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 21, 2003 Session CHRISTOPHER NASH POWELL v. PATSY CONLEY POWELL Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Haywood County No. 11937 George R. Ellis, Chancellor No. W2002-00421-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 7, 2003 This case involves the proper valuation and division of marital property, the

283 S.W.3d 605 (2008) James A. NASH, Appellant, v. LANDMARK STORAGE, LLC, Appellee. No. CA 07-1138. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. April 23, 2008. *606 Ed Daniel, Little Rock, for appellant. Barber, McCaskill, Jones & Hale, P.A., Little Rock, by: J. Carter Fairley and Rick Behring, Jr., for appellee. KAREN R. BAK

INMAN, Judge. *727 This appeal arises from a $757 hospital bill. It concerns an insurance company's payment of a total settlement directly to a pro se personal injury claimant by check made payable jointly to the claimant and two of her medical providers, each of which he

576 F.Supp. 272 (1983) Kenneth POWELL, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Norma Jean Powell and as next friend for Donna Powell v. CHARLES OFFUTT COMPANY, et al. v. The BUDD COMPANY, et al. No. TY-80-132-CA. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. November 23, 1983. *273 James E

58 F.Supp.2d 294 (1999) Sean POLLACK, Kyle Pollack, Paul Pollack, all infants, by their parent and natural guardian Stuart Pollack, Rachel Pollack and Stuart Pollack, Plaintiffs, v. Joan NASH, Barbara Wilmit, William P. Warren, Jacqueline Sands, Margaret Garvey, Alexander Bursztein, G. Nicholas Del Pizzo, Noah Weinberg, in his capacity as the Commissioner of Social Services of the County of Rockland of the State of New York, County of Rockland, P

Sweeney, J. ¶1 To effect service of process, a person must be over 18 years old, competent to be a witness, and not a party to the action. Here, a process server hired by the plaintiff served a neighbor of the defendants in this personal injury suit rather than the defendants. But the neighbor was qualified to serve process, served the proper defendants, and signed an affidavit to that effect. We conclude that was sufficient to

182 P.3d 441 (2008) Ellen BROWN-EDWARDS, Respondent, v. James and Shirley POWELL, husband and wife; Petitioners, Jenne Tiffany and John Doe Tiffany, husband and wife, Defendants. No. 26028-3-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. April 17, 2008. Steven Robert Stocker, Stocker, Smith, Luciani & Staub PLLC, Spokane, WA, for Petitioners. Gregor