Cases

KENNELLY, District Judge. In 2012, Eric Harden sued the Marion County Sheriffs Department for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of. 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e* Of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. 3(a). He alleged that the Sheriffs Department terminated him in retaliation for testifying on behalf of African-American police officers in a race discrim

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 724 Plaintiff-appellant, Theresa Myers, appeals an order of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Goodwill Industries of Akron ("Goodwill"), on Myers's negligent-retention claim. We affirm. Myers was hired as a security coordinator by Goodwill on J

J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge Before the court for review is a Motion *344for Summary Judgment1 (ECF No. 5) by Defendants Marci Andino, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission ("SCSEC"); Billy Way, Jr., Chair of the SCSEC; and Mark A. Benson, Marilyn Bowers, and Nicole S

MEMORANDUM DECISION Mar 25 2015, 9:06 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kristina J. Jacobucci Gregory F

270 F.Supp.2d 132 (2003) Neil HOWARD, Heidi Howard, Christopher Howard, Ethan Howard, Jessica Howard, and Neil Howard and Heidi Howard as executors of the Estate of Faith Howard, Plaintiffs, v. Barbara MALAC, Paige Haley, Judy Beland, Mary Ellen D'Intino, Cynthia Preston, Elizabeth Czarnionka, Katherine Graves, Nancy Gingras, Zevorah Bagni, and Margaret Hajjar, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-12106-WGY. Unit

591 S.E.2d 135 (2003) 214 W.Va. 577 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Nancy Louise MOSS, et al., Defendants Below, Appellees, West Virginia Coalbed Methane Review Board, Appellee. No. 31238. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 23, 2003. Decided November 20, 2003.

624 N.W.2d 738 (2000) 243 Mich. App. 578 Brent Johnson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michelle Johnson, and Linda Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. Lawrence Heite, The Detroit Edison Company, Verna's Tavern, Inc, Andrew Lee Erving, Timdan, Inc, and Ford Motor Company, Defendants, and VERNA'S TAVERN, INC, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence HEITE, Cross-Defendant-Appellee. Donald E. Dunn, as Personal

AMBER HALE, f/k/a AMBER KOESTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD36912 ) BURLINGTON NORTHERN & ) FILED: December 3, 2021 SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, )

WALTERS, J. This case involves a challenge to a juvenile court’s decision to waive its jurisdiction over a 13-year-old boy who was alleged to have committed aggravated murder. Under the relevant statutes, ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, a youth under the age of 15 who is alleged to have committed murder may be waived into adult court only if, at the time of the conduct, he or she “was of sufficient sophistication and maturity t

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0417p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - LARRY SKOWRONEK,

No. 32 May 26, 2016 559 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of J. C. N.-V., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. J. C. N.-V., Petitioner on Review. (CC J090600; CA A147958; SC S063111) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and s

No. 32 May 26, 2016 559 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of J. C. N.-V., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. J. C. N.-V., Petitioner on Review. (CC J090600; CA A147958; SC S063111) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and s

RICH, Circuit Judge. The Donaldson Company (Donaldson) appeals from the January 30, 1991 decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), reaffirmed on reconsideration on April 17, 1991, sustaining the Examiner’s rejection of claim 1 of reexamination application Serial No. 90/001,776

364 B.R. 808 (2007) In re FOREST HILL FUNERAL HOME & MEMORIAL PARK-East, LLC, a Tennessee, LLC, d/b/a Forest Hill Funeral Home and Memorial Park-Midtown, d/b/a Forest Hill Funeral Home and Memorial Park-South, d/b/a Edgewood Memorial Park, d/b/a Arlington Park Cemetery, d/b/a Memorial Park, d/b/a Rest Haven Memorial Gardens, Debtor. No. 07-80056. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma.

433 F.Supp.2d 172 (2006) In re NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS Liability Litigation. This Document Relates to: Harden Manufacturing Corp., et al. v. Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Co. The Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Pfizer Inc. and Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. MDL No. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-10981-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massach

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN SCOTT GRATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 21-cv-1859 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This action arises out of the bombing on June 25,

PROST, Chief Judge. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in favor of Apple Inc. (“Apple”). A jury found that Samsung infringed Apple’s design and utility patents and d

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES MCRITCHIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0890-JTL ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL K. ) SANDBERG, ROBERT M. KIMMITT, ) PEGGY ALFORD, MARC L.