Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rolando Garcia-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Garcia-Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, co

Klingensmith, J. Appellant Juan Sanchez was awarded attorney’s fees against appellees AN Luxury Imports of Pembroke Pines, Inc. (“ANL”) and Safeco Insurance Company of America (“Safeco”) (collectively, “defendants”). He appeals that order, claiming the fee awards were unreasonably low. Defendants cross-appeal, arguing that the *725fee award against Safeco was too high

3 P.3d 695 (2000) 129 N.M. 200 2000-NMCA-051 ONTIVEROS INSULATION CO., INC., and Rawson, Inc. Builders Supply, Cross Claimants-Appellees, v. Ricardo M. SANCHEZ, Geraldine Sanchez, and Nancy Bustamante, Cross Defendants-Appellants. No. 19,817. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. May 15, 2000. *

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Forst, J. We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion, and substitute the following. Appellant Nancy Hua (“Wife”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Primarily, Wife contends that the trial court erred by (1) not awarding her permanent alimony;

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC12-1947 ____________ TIMOTHY LEE HURST, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [May 1, 2014] PER CURIAM. Timothy Lee Hurst appe

ACCEPTED 13-15-00233-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/14/2015 2:08:40 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Opinion issued August 30, 2012. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-10-01119-CV ——————————— LARRY TIDWELL AND NANCY TIDWELL, Appellants V. TEREX CORP., TEREX CRANES INC., AND KOEHRING CRANES INC.,

Opinion issued August 12, 2004 In The Court of Appeals

Barnes, Judge. Case Summary David L. Newson appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for modification of his seventy-three-year sentence for murder and class C felony carrying, a handgun without-a license. 1 We affirm.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════

Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Deborah Lee Prince ("Prince") brings this appeal under section 405(g) of title 42 of the United States Code from the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("SSA"), which denied her application for Title II disability insurance benefits and Title XVI supplemental security income. See Comp

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice. Delfingen US-Texas, L.P. has brought this accelerated appeal from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTUAL SUMMARY Delfingen specializes in the design and manufacture of wiring harnesses and ot

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

520 F.Supp.2d 231 (2007) GE HFS HOLDINGS, INC. f/k/a Heller Healthcare Finance, Inc., Plaintiff, and Michael Ingoldsby, Intervenor/Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. Of PITTSBURGH, PA, and International Ins. Group, Ltd., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-11128-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 5, 2007.

DISCUSSION An ALJ applies a well-established five-step evaluation process to determine whether a claimant is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, familiarity with which is presumed. See Bowen v. City of New York , 476 U.S. 467, 470-71,

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. The narrow issue we must decide in this case is whether Plaintiff Hyde Park Company was entitled as a matter of federal constitutional law to approval of a proposed subdivision plat for land within the City of Santa Fe, New Mexico, where Hyde Park’s proposed plat to Defendant Santa Fe City Council met all enumerated requirements for plat approval. <

204 F.3d 797 (8th Cir. 2000) JOHN E. SEARCY, III, SUI JURIS, APPELLANT,V.JAMES E. DONELSON, I.R.S.; BILL WILDE, I.R.S.; LEE R. MONKS, I.R.S.; JOYCE SHEAD, I.R.S.; NANCY BELLCOCK, I.R.S.; K. J. SAWYER, I.R.S.; JAMES E. GAMBLE, I.R.S.; MAURICE BONDS WHILLOCK, VAN BUREN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER; LISA NUNLEY, VAN BUREN COUNTY COLLECTOR; VAN BUREN COUNTY, ARKANSAS; DOES, ALL UNKNOWN OTHERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES.

WARNER, J. Victor Castillo appeals his convictions for racketeering and conspiracy to commit racketeering. First, he contends that the state failed to prove interrelatedness between the predicate incidents and the criminal street gang, of which he was a member, for purposes of proving a pattern of racketeering activity and as to the conspiracy to commit racketeering. Second, as on

17 Cal.4th 93 (1998) RALPH COTRAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROLLINS HUDIG HALL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S057098. Supreme Court of California. January 5, 1998. *95 COUNSEL Shand S. Stephens, Margaret L. Parker, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason, Henry D. Lederma