Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nancy J Hobbs”
Hobbs v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. We initially accepted for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Hobbs v. State, 820 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), which certified conflict with Whitson v. State, 791 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered.
Hobbs v. Rossbackpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellants challenge the order of the trial court which awarded custody of the minor child of appellant, John Hobbs, and appellee, Nancy Hobbs Rossback, to appel-lee. Appellee concedes at oral argument that the order is a temporary custody award. We affirm. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 7530269 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 5716292 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 8395164 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwestpublic domain
823 N.E.2d 561 (2005) 214 Ill.2d 11 291 Ill.Dec. 269 Lula HOBBS, Appellee, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Appellant. Lee Ann Anheuser et al., Appellees, v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant. Nos. 97481, 98309. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 21, 2005.
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 5703544 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 03-15-00280-CV AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/16/2015 8:03:12 PM
Wash. Conserv. Action Educ. Fund v. Hobbspublic domain
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON OCTOBER 17, 2024 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON SARA
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 7530186 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 4636064 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 8395085 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 4388670 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
State ex rel. Hobbs v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Hobbs v. Indus. Comm., 2023-Ohio-1759.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Jasper Hobbs, Jr., : Relator, : No. 22AP-308 v. :
JAMES, NANCY, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 145 KA 12-01039 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY JAMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SC
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 4511551 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 03-15-00085-CV AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/2015 1:38:15 PM
Hobbs v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.public domain
' JEFFREY W. BATES, J. Tamko ^Building Products, Inc. (Tamko), a manufacturer of roofing shingles, appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of disputes with plaintiffs Lee. Hobbs and the Jonesburg United Methodist Church (referred to individually as Hobbs and Jonesburg and collectively as Plaintiffs), who purchased Tamko’s shingles.1 Tamko contends the trial court erred in d
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hobbs v. Department of Highwayspublic domain
WALLACE, JUDGE: The claimant filed this claim against the respondent in the amount of $35.74 for damages to his 1978 Mercury Monarch automobile which occurred on January 1, 1979. On the day of the accident, the claimant was driving on Route 1/5 from Logan, West Virginia, to his farm. It was daylight. He described the weather as “mushy”. The claimant testified that he was proceeding at eight to ten miles per
Matter of K.H. (J.H.)public domain
Matter of K.H. (J.H.) (2025 NY Slip Op 04948) Matter of K.H. (J.H.) 2025 NY Slip Op 04948 Decided on September 11, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opin