Cases

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-2841 _____________________________ NANCY GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. THE KENT HOTEL/AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA OF FLORIDA, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. Sylvia Medina-Shore, Judge. Date of Accident: March 18, 2015.

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL EDUARDO RUBIO Certiorari CARTAYA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Recurrido Sala de San Juan KLCE202400748

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 14, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated her a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. This proceeding was commenced after the appellant was convicted in federal court of th

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAEL J. GOPIN, § No. 08-14-00233-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAEL J. GOPIN, § No. 08-14-00233-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

Affirmed.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated June 30, 2011, which denied her motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The plaintiffs decedent, Carmen Diaz, allegedly was crossing the street within a crosswalk at an intersection with a traffic light in her favo

Paul S. Diamond, J. On April 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed this action for review of the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for disability benefits for all dates prior to July 10, 2015. (Doc. No. 3.) On January 17, 2018, Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart issued a Report and Recommendation, advising me to enter partial Judgment in Plaintiff's favor and remand the matter to the Commissioner for a hearing on the indepe

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated June 24, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff Nancy Gonzalez and against it in the principal sum of $850,000. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The defendant’s contention that the court erred in refusing to charge the jury on com

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION James O. Browning, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed December 10, 2015 (Doc. 53)(“PFRD”). In the PFRD, the Honorable Stephan M. Vid-mar, United States Magistrate Judge, recommends di

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO EN EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 EDUARDO RUBIO CERTIORARI CARTAYA procedente del Tribunal de Recurrido Primera Instancia Sala Superior de v. KLCE202500514 San Juan NANCY DOLORES MÉ

MIHALAKOS, J. The defendant, Juan Carlos Gonzalez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of sexual assault in a cohabiting relationship in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70b, one count of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a)(2), and two counts of criminal violation of a protective order in violation

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: *187 The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) denied Dolores Margarita Gonzalez a certificate of citizenship, first in 2008, then again in 2016. Gonzalez challenged only the agency's 2016 denial. The Government argues Gonzalez's ch

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about November 6, 2013, which committed respondent-appellant father to the New York City Department of Correction for a three-month term based upon an order of the same court and Judge, entered on or about August 13, 2013, confirming the finding of the Support Magistrate that respondent willfully violated an order, dated August 24, 2009,

ROWE, J. On August 2, 2008, two months before his seventeenth birthday, Jose Gonzalez sought out and killed a 49 year-old man, who was in poor health and weighed only 108 pounds. Gonzalez killed the victim by stabbing him twelve times. Following a jury trial, Gonzalez was convicted of first-degree, premeditated murder, a capital felony, requiring a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant the motion for written opinion and certification but deny the motion for rehearing. The earlier disposition without opinion is withdrawn and replaced by this opinion. AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florid

NUMBER 13-00-251-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ NANCY GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF ANAHI GONZALEZ, A MINOR , Appellant, v. REFUGIA ACOSTA , Appellee. ____

50 So.3d 633 (2010) Jose GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D09-2490. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 5, 2010. Rehearing Denied January 10, 2011. *634 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.<

ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of Court’s Amended Opinion and Order (Docket No. 153), Docket No. 154; (b) Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Reconsideration,” Docket No. 158, and (c) Plaintiffs’ reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration, Docket No. 161. For the r

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 14, 2013, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for preclusion of a nonparty witness’s deposition testimony, sanctions for failing to produce another witness, and severance of defendants’ third-party action, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny de