Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nancy A. Smith”
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00569-CV James ZIMMERHANZEL and Linda Zimmerhanzel, Appellants v. William O. SMITH, Jr., Nancy A. Smith, J.M. Butz, Jr. d/b/a Butz Land Surveying, et al., Appellees From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2020 Term FILED _____________________ June 15, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 19-1018 EDYTHE NASH GAIS
Carolyn Combs v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2849 ___________________________ Carolyn Combs lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill,1 Commissioner, Social Security Administr
Carolyn Combs v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2849 ___________________________ Carolyn Combs lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill,1 Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
United States v. Nancy Smithpublic domain
OPINION THOMAS, Chief Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether a criminal forfeiture action constitutes an “alternate remedy” to a civil qui tam action under the False Claims Act, entitling a relator to intervene in the criminal action and recover a share of the proceeds pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(5). We hold that it does not, and we affirm the d
Rhonda Gann v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Rhonda Gann appeals the decision of the district court affirming the decision of the Commissioner denying her application for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. .§ 1291 and finding substantial eviden
Stephen Chismarich v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Stephen P. Chismarich appeals the district court's 1 judgment affirming the Commissioner's denial of disability benefits and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amy Thomas v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Amy Thomas was thirty-four years old, the mother of a four-year-old son, and in the process of divorcing her second husband. A high-school graduate, she lived on her own, cared for herself and her indoor dog and cat, tended her home, managed her finances, and led a more-or-less independent life. She had custody of her son every othe
Charles Bryant v. Nancy A. Berryhillpublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Charles Bryant appeals the decision of the district court 2 affirming the decision of the Commissioner to uphold the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act. Having jur
MOORE, SHELLY F. v. CURTISS, NANCY A.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Mark A. Montour, J.), entered August 12, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant Nancy A. Curtiss for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against her. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
S. A. M. v. Nancy M. Meisterpublic domain
2016 WI 22 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1283 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the marriage of: Nancy M. Meister and Jay E. Meister: S. A. M., A. L. M., O. M. M. and J. E. M., minors, by their guardian ad litem, Jennifer Weber, Appellan
PER CURIAM. This appeal and cross appeal .are taken from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The former wife, Nancy Smith Schroll, challenges the trial court’s failure to award her sufficient permanent periodic alimony and attorney’s fees and costs, The former husband, Stephen B. Schroll, attacks the trial court’s valuation and distribution of ma
Nancy Harrison v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Nancy Harrison brought suit against her employer Wells Fargo, arguing that the company improperly terminated her short-term disability benefits while she was undergoing a series of treatments for thyr
Leopoldo Leon v. Nancy Berryhillpublic domain
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION The Opinion filed on November 7, 2017 is amended as follows: At page 12, line 18 through page 13, line 2, delete and replace with <Becau
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2025 Term FILED _______________ March 21, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK No. 24-343
Bart A. Houston v. Michael McKnought-Smith, Barbara McKnought-Smith and Robert J. Moraitis, P.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. We reverse the order of the trial court ordering the former wife’s attorney to pay attorney’s fees'to the former husband’s previous attorney. The husband’s previous attorney claimed that the wife’s attorney had failed to remove him from the service list, requiring him to take action to compel his removal. Thus, the previous attorney claimed that he had to file a moti
James Barrett v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting Cmsnrpublic domain
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: In deciding whether a claimant is eligible for Social Security disability benefits, administrative law judges often consider the reports of medical consultants. These doctors, who work for either Social Security or a state agency, do not examine the claimant but review the medical files of those who have and assess the claimant's physical limitations. We deci
Fisher v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.public domain
*755DISSENTING OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: Upon review of the plain language of the Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) between A.O. Smith (“Smith”) and CST, Industries, Inc. (“CST”), I cannot agree that a genuine issue of material fact exists with regard to CST’s obligation to indemnify Smith. Thus, I respectfully dissent. The record confirms
Nancy Rubel v. Commissioner Internal Revenuepublic domain
OPINION SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. Nancy Rubel appeals the United States Tax Court’s dismissal of her petition for lack of jurisdiction. Because Rubel failed to file her petition by the deadline set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6015(e)(1)(A), and because that deadline is jurisdictional, the Tax Court properly dismissed her petition, and we will affirm.