Cases

Susan L. Carney, Circuit Judge: *183We confront here primarily a question of legislative immunity raised by a mayor's inaction in the face of well-developed but extra-contractual expectations of the prospective developer of a low-income housing project. A real estate development team that included plaintiffs-appellants NRP Ho

17-783-cv NRP Holdings LLC v. City of Buffalo 17-783-cv NRP Holdings LLC v. City of Buffalo United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: January 31, 2018 Decided: February 20, 20

USCA11 Case: 21-11742 Date Filed: 09/29/2022 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11742 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ In Re: NRP LEASE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Debtors.

OPINION OF THE COURT Friedman, J. This action concerns 1420 Broadway, a property in the Times Square area comprising a free-standing, three-story retail building and the land on which it is built. The property is owned by defendant NRP LLC I (NRP), and was formerly leased to plaintiff Chock Full O’Nuts Corporation (CFON) under a net lease set to expire on March 12, 2001. After the commencement of this acti

USCA11 Case: 21-11742 Date Filed: 12/10/2021 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11742 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ In Re: NRP LEASE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Debtor

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered May 30, 2003, which, inter alia, granted defendant landlord NRP’s motion for summary judgment upon its counterclaim for possession of commercial premises leased from it by plaintiff tenant Chock Full O’Nuts Corporation and directed a hearing respecting damages, if any, sustained by NRP by reason of the holdover of Chock Full O’Nuts and its assignee intervenor-plaintiff Stahl from Marc

GARRETT, J. 11 This matter involves a dispute over the proper interpretation to be given to a depth limitation clause contained in a large sale of mineral interests in 2008, from International Paper Company (“IP”) to Chesapeake Royalty, LLC (“Chesapeake”). The plaintiff here, BRP, LLC (“BRP”), later acquired mineral interests from IP and brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it owned all of the Bossier Shale

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC21-1717 ____________ 1944 BEACH BOULEVARD, LLC, Appellant, vs. LIVE OAK BANKING COMPANY, Appellee. August 25, 2022 LAWSON, J. This case is before the Court for review of three questions of Florida law

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HV JVCO I, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff-Counterclaim ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-12-237 PRW ) CCLD OPEN ON SUNDAY, LLC, ) ) Defendant-Counterclaim ) Plaintiff.

Liberty Equity Restoration Corp. v Pil Soung Park (2018 NY Slip Op 02318) Liberty Equity Restoration Corp. v Pil Soung Park 2018 NY Slip Op 02318 Decided on April 4, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published

772 F.Supp.2d 418 (2011) SPA 77 G L.P., Plaintiff, v. MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC, Defendant. Motiva Enterprises LLC, Third-party Plaintiff, v. Sergio Enterprises Inc. and Sergio Celikoyar, Third-party Defendants. No. CV-09-1665 (SJF)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 22, 2011. Order Denying Reconsideration June 1, 2011.

Liberty Equity Restoration Corp. v Maeng-Soon Yun (2018 NY Slip Op 02317) Liberty Equity Restoration Corp. v Maeng-Soon Yun 2018 NY Slip Op 02317 Decided on April 4, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published

USCA11 Case: 22-12336 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 01/08/2025 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12336 ____________________ In Re: PAYROLL MANAGEMENT, INC.,

USCA11 Case: 21-13489 Document: 93-1 Date Filed: 10/07/2024 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13489 ____________________ DREAM DEFENDERS, BLACK COLLECTIVE INC., CHAINL

*191OPINION OF THE COURT Gerald Lebovits, J. In this holdover proceeding, petitioner, 88th Street Realty, L.E, argues that William Maher is financially responsible for the use and occupancy between January 1, 2008, and June 4, 2008, damages, and legal fees incurred as a result of Maxine Nemzer’s failure to vacate the subject premises, apartment No. 21

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 12911642 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

956 A.2d 561 (2008) 2008 VT 64 Harley GRICE, Individually and as Trustee of the Harley Grice Trust, Wendy Butler, Penny Curler and Heather Grice v. VERMONT ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. In re Petition of Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. Nos. 06-352, 06-510. Supreme Court of Vermont. May 16, 2008. *564

OPINION OF THE COURT Jack M. Battaglia, J. In this commercial holdover proceeding, petitioner James Pinto Photography, Ltd. seeks to recover possession of premises described as “all rooms, First Floor, 7513 13th Avenue, Brooklyn,” occupied by respondents Constance Sheppard and Sheppard Music School, Inc. Asserting that the premises are held “under monthly hiring,” petitioner served a 30-day notice that purpo

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: This case concerns an alleged fraudulent scheme to promote certain third-party companies offering multi-level marketing and training programs. The Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") asserts racketeering and conspiracy claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1

2008 VT 64 Grice v. Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. (2006-352 & 2006-510) 2008 VT 64 [Filed 16-May-2008] NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision b