⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “NORTH AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. SESSA”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-09-25 · Published · cited 47× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 992; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73196; 2006 WL 2726102
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-08-27 · Published · cited 34× · 970 F. Supp. 2d 108; 2013 WL 4522594; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122028
ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Poliak dated August 9, 2013, to which no objections have been filed, is adopted in its entirety. The Court grants Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and directs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in the amount of $14,914.34, consisting of: (1) $4,378.63 in unpaid Required Contributions,
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013-02-26 · Published · cited 72× · 433 Md. 303; 71 A.3d 30; 2013 Md. LEXIS 694
HARRELL, J. On 17 February 2006, Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”), reported a leak of approximately 26,000 gallons of gasoline from the underground tanks at its fueling station located in Jacksonville, Maryland.1 The seemingly cursed Jacksonville community, the unfortunate site of multiple gasoline leaks over the years, see, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Yarema, 69 Md.App. 124, 516 A.2
Keith v. Buchananpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1985-10-09 · Published · cited 70× · 173 Cal. App. 3d 13; 220 Cal. Rptr. 392; 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 386; 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2603
173 Cal.App.3d 13 (1985) 220 Cal. Rptr. 392 BRIAN KEITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAMES BUCHANAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B004734. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. October 9, 1985. *17 COUNSEL Charles C. McCarthy, McCarthy, Bullis & Post and
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995-04-04 · Published · cited 257× · 232 Conn. 480; 656 A.2d 1009; 1995 Conn. LEXIS 97
Berdon, J. The plaintiff, Larsen Chelsey Realty Company, instituted this thirteen count action against the defendants, S. Craig Larsen (Larsen) and H. Pearce Company (Pearce Company), seeking monetary damages, legal fees and punitive damages. The plaintiff was a real estate broker with an office in New Haven. Larsen is the former president of the plaintiff and an employee of Pearce Company, a competing real estate broker in New H
District Court, E.D. New York · 1997-03-10 · Published · cited 19× · 956 F. Supp. 1071; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2662; 1997 WL 109000
956 F.Supp. 1071 (1997) Victor J. ORENA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Pasquale AMATO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Nos. 96 CV 1474, 92 CR 351 and 96 CV 1461. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 10, 1997. *1072 *1073
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007-02-16 · Published · cited 30× · 241 F.R.D. 305
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, Chief Judge. This cause is before the Court on a motion for class certification (Doc. 84). For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. Introduction The matter before the Court concerns claims for breach of express warranties by Defendant General Motors Corporation (“GMC”) brought pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss W