⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “NJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development v. Jones”

Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008-05-15 · Published · cited 121× · 946 A.2d 1039; 194 N.J. 534; 2008 N.J. LEXIS 424
946 A.2d 1039 (2008) 194 N.J. 534 John M. UTLEY, Claimant-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent-Respondent, and Myron Manufacturing Corporation, Respondent. A-126 September Term 2006 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 27, 2007. Decided May 15, 2008. *1040
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-07-14 · Published · cited 32× · 576 F. Supp. 2d 463; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53359; 2008 WL 2755787
576 F.Supp.2d 463 (2008) TIFFANY (NJ) INC. and Tiffany and Company, Plaintiffs, v. EBAY, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 4607(RJS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 14, 2008. *468 H. Peter Haveles, Jr., Esq. and James B. Swire, Esq. (Eleanor M. Lackman, *469 Esq., and Erik C. Wal
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020-01-03 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2899-17T4 KATHLEEN J. DELANOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. January 3, 2020 APPELLATE D
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 59× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 502
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-02-05 · Published · cited 10× · 289 F.R.D. 144; 2013 WL 444673; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15571
OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This case concerns allegations of deception and bad faith against a health insurance company, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). Plaintiffs Beverly Clark, Jesse J. Paul, Warren Gold, Linda M. Cusanelli, Carole L. Walcher, and Terri L. Drogell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed a putative class action complaint against Prudenti
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-03-04 · Published · cited 75× · 917 F.3d 1249
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case requires us to apply the standards announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 394 N.J. Super. 446; 927 A.2d 164; 182 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3259; 2007 N.J. Super. LEXIS 248
The opinion of the court was delivered by MINIMAN, J.A.D. After between 240 and 280 nurses employed by appellant Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County (Lourdes) walked off the job on April 19, 2004, ninety-seven of the nurses filed for unemployment benefits on June 6, 2004. Unemployment benefits are designed to “ameliorate the impact of involuntary unemployment.” Sweeney v. Bd. of Review, 43 <
Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982-01-25 · Published · cited 14× · 531 F. Supp. 1191
531 F.Supp. 1191 (1981) In the Matter of The VALUATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 303(c) AND 306 OF the REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1973. Misc. No. 76-1. Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganization Act. November 24, 1981. On Petitions for Reconsideration January 25, 1982. *1192 *1193
Supreme Court of the United States · 1986-07-02 · Published · cited 725× · 92 L. Ed. 2d 344; 106 S. Ct. 3019; 478 U.S. 421; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 132; 54 U.S.L.W. 4984; 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,204; 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 107
*426Justice Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, and VI, and an opinion with respect to Parts IV, V, and VII in which Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens join. In 1975, petitioners were found guilty of engaging in a pattern and practice of discrimination a
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Elmer Branch v. Cream-O-Land Dairy (A-29-19) (083379) Argued September 30, 2020 -- Decided January 13, 2021 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. Plaintiff
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-11-18 · Published · cited 5× · 61 F. Supp. 3d 465; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162024; 2014 WL 6471565
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a former employee of the Housing Authority and Urban Redevelopment Agency of the. City of Atlantic City (“ACHA”), alleges in an eight-count complaint that he was fired due to his political affiliation and in retaliation for exercising his rights under the United States and New Jersey. Constitutions and the Family and Medical Lea
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0102-18T3 VINCENT HAGER, Petitioner-Respondent/ APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Cross-Appellant, January 13, 2020 v. APPELLATE DIVISION
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-05-08 · Published · cited 76× · 679 F.3d 560; 2012 WL 1592552
679 F.3d 560 (2012) Susan SCHAEFER-LaROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. James Jirak, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. Nos. 10-3855, 11-1980, 11-2131. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 18, 2011. Decid
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-01-29 · Published · cited 20× · 299 F.R.D. 68; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10805; 2014 WL 320048
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification of a FLSA “opt-in” collective action and certification of a Rule 23 “opt-out” state wage class action [Docket Item 43], Defendants’ motion to seal [Docket Item 66], and Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss Cardo Windows, Inc.’s counter-claims for breach of contr
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Elmer Branch v. Cream-O-Land Dairy (A-29-19) (083379) Argued September 30, 2020 -- Decided January 13, 2021 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. Plaintiff
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-08-31 · Published · cited 2× · 328 F. Supp. 3d 662
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Court Judge Eight states and two governors1 are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and ask this Court to hold that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") program is illegal because its creation and continued existence violate the procedural and substantive aspects of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA").