Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “NICHOLSON v. COLMAN”
Nicholson v. Allied Interstate, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Richard Nicholson (“plaintiff’) brings this action against Allied Interstate, LLC (“Allied”) and iQor, Inc. (“iQor”) (collectively, “defendants”), asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Plaintiff asserts claims individually and as a representative of a putative class action.
BEECHER LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALVAREZ & MARSAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Liquidating Trustee of the Azabu Liquidating Trust Dated July 10, 2007;[1] WAIKIKI FIRST FINANCE CORP.; WAIKIKI SF CORPORATION; AZABU U.S.A. CORPORATION; HYATT CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, and THE CHUO MITSUI TRUST AND BANKING COMPANY, LIMITED; and DEFENDANTS DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. No. 28011. Intermediate Court of A
The Upjohn Manufacturing Company and the Upjohn Company v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretarypublic domain
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal grew out of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a new drug application filed by a competitor of appellants Upjohn, Boots Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Boots). In the new drug application, Boots sought permission to manufacture and distribute the drug ibuprofen under the trademark, “Ruf
Himrich v. Carpenterpublic domain
KEAN, Circuit Judge. PROCEDURAL HISTORY/FACTUAL BACKGROUND [¶ 1.] In 1994 the South Dakota Supreme Court held that a lease-purchase agreement between the City of Custer (City) and Homes, Inc., which included the Custer City Attorney, Gerald Baldwin (Baldwin), as one of the principles, was null and void as viola-tive of public policy under SDCL 6-1-1. Speckels v. Baldwin, 512 N.W.2d 171 (S.D.1994)
Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Leepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge For approximately seven months in 2010, Mona Floyd was the legislative director and chief counsel in the office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee. 1 Ms. Floyd, who is proceeding pro se, now brings suit agai
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.public domain
651 N.E.2d 1071 (1995) 166 Ill.2d 48 209 Ill.Dec. 623 Elizabeth SANDER et al., Appellees, v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY et al., Appellants. No. 76115. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 30, 1995. Rehearing Denied May 30, 1995. *1072 Constantine L. Trela, Stephan V. Beyer an
136 Ill.2d 513 (1990) 558 N.E.2d 89 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al., Respondents (Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, State of Illinois, Intervenor-Respondent). No. 69823. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed July 3, 1990. Modified on denial of re
Bosio v. Norbay Securities, Inc.public domain
599 F.Supp. 1563 (1985) Richard J. BOSIO, Plaintiff, v. NORBAY SECURITIES, INC. and Benjamin Taormina, Defendants. No. 84 Civ. 3914. United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 8, 1985. *1564 Daniel J. Piliero II, Eileen Malloy-Wall, Tighe, Curhan & Piliero, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Ormsten & Evang
Rybicki v. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS OF STATE OF ILL.public domain
574 F.Supp. 1082 (1982) Chester J. RYBICKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants. Miguel DelVALLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants. Bruce CROSBY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al., Defendants. Nos. 81 C 6030, 81 C 6052 and 81 C
Griffin v. First National Bankpublic domain
Peterson, Justice. This appeal brings here for review an order denying an alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial after the trial court overruled objections interposed by the successor trustee and certain remaindermen to the account filed by the executrices of the first trustee of the trust created under the will of decedent. *209The questions involved'
Western Steel Casting Co. v. Edlandpublic domain
On April 27, 1934, Edward L. Edland entered into a contract with the state of Washington, whereby he agreed to "do all work and furnish all tools, materials and equipment for manufacturing and stockpiling crushed stone (oil rock) materials" on a state highway to be constructed in King and Pierce counties. Among others, the contract contained the following provision: "The term `materials' as used herein includes, in addition to materials incorporated in the project used or to be used in
Hammond v. Statepublic domain
The appellant was indicted and tried in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City for the murder of Edith Milman on August 12th, 1937. The case was submitted for trial before the court without a jury. Three exceptions were reserved in the course of the trial, which resulted in a verdict of "guilty of murder in the first degree." After a motion by the defendant for a new trial had been overruled by the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City, he was sentenced by the criminal court to suffer death, and from
State Ex Rel. Bevan v. Williamspublic domain
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Macon County, in a proceeding in certiorari, quashing the records and proceedings of the probate court of that county, wherein the relator, William J. Bevan, was adjudged to be a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing his affairs. The purported adjudication occurred on March 1, 1921, and the appointment of a guardian of relator's person and estate on March 2nd. Following the adjudication of insanity and the ap
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: “There is no iron curtain drawn between the Constitution and the prisons of this country.” 1 When the remedial powers of a federal court are invoked to protect the constitutional rights of inmates, the court may not take a “hands-off” approach.
Zavelo v. Reevespublic domain
227 U.S. 625 (1913) ZAVELO v. REEVES. No. 299. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. *626 Mr. Oscar R. Hundley for plaintiff in error submitted. Mr. Samuel A. Putman for defendants in error. <
St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Foxpublic domain
1 Reported in 173 P.2d 194. The only record before us on this appeal is the second amended complaint filed by plaintiff, St. Paul Tacoma Lumber Company, a corporation, on March 13, 1946; a demurrer, filed by defendants, R.S. Fox and Margaret Fox, his wife, Kosmos Timber Company, Mountain Lumber Company, Tacoma Export Lumber Company, R.S.M. Nicholson, Seattle Export Lumber Company, the
Swords v. Occident Elevator Co.public domain
Stated briefly, the facts out of which this controversy arose are that the Citizens' National Bank of Laurel held a chattel 7. Sale of mortgaged chattels by or with the consent of mortgagor, and application of proceeds to payment of mortgage as a foreclosure cutting off intervening liens, see note in 45L.R.A. (n.s.) 1137. *Page 191 mortgage upon a crop of grain belonging to G.A. Starkweather to secure an indebtedness of something o
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di