Cases

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. NFC Technology, LLC (“NFC”) appeals from the final written decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding concluding that claims 1-3 and 5 of U.S. Patent 6,700,551 (“the ’551 patent”) are unpatentable as obvious. See HTC Corp. v. NFC T

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

Taranto, Circuit Judge, concurring. I join the panel's opinion in full. Here I add a few thoughts on why I am unpersuaded by the key rationales set forth in the dissent from the court's en banc holding. The en banc issue is governed by statutory language that, as the panel opinion explains, is plain in its meaning. In September 2001, Ingenio (then called Keen) was served with a complaint asserting that it in

ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. On August 5, 2015, in the above-captioned cases, the defendants filed motions to stay1 pending completion of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTÓ”) inter partes review (“IPR”).2 The motions *1034are now fully briefed' and ready for dispo

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court following a Markman hearing, conducted for the purpose of construing nine disputed claim terms in the patents-in-suit. After careful consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties and the arguments advanced at the Markman hearing, the Court issues the following Opinion and Order detailing th

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge This action arises from a patent infringement dispute between On Track Innovations Ltd. (“OTI”), a developer of virtual payment systems and the current owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,045,043 (“the ’043 patent”), and T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), a mobile network operator (“MNO”). OTI alleges that T-Mobile infringed the ’043 patent through its sale of ne