Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) BETTY ANN NEWBY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 08-1624 (EGS) ) BARACK H. OBAMA,1 et al., ) ) Defendants. )

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed. Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s August 14, 2008 minute order dismissing appellant’s

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed. Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s August 14, 2008 minute order dismissing appellant’s

Newby v Morales (2023 NY Slip Op 04934) Newby v Morales 2023 NY Slip Op 04934 Decided on October 03, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Newby v Morales (2023 NY Slip Op 04934) Newby v Morales 2023 NY Slip Op 04934 Decided on October 03, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

846 N.E.2d 761 (2006) Heather SKEFFINGTON d/b/a Skeff's Landscaping, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. David BUSH d/b/a Great Oaks Nursery, Appellee-Defendant. No. 45A05-0510-CV-577. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 5, 2006. *762 Lukas I. Cohen, James B. Meyer, Meyer & Wyatt, P.C., Gary, for Appellant. Gene M. Jones, Matthew J.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROBERT NEWBY, ) ) Appellant, )

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: v. Civil Action No. 21-2567 (PLF) [UNDER SEAL] JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al., Respondents. ) SAIFULLAH PARACHA, ) ) Petitioner, y ) V. ) Civil Action No. 04-2022 (PLF) ) (UNDER SEAL] JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al., ) . ) Respondents. ) ) ) SAIFULLAH.PARACHA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) 2, ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Saifutlah Paracha has filed a Metion for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SAIFULLAH PARACHA, } } Petitioner, ) ) Vv. 5) Civil Action No. 04-2022 (PLF) ) (UNDER SEAL] JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.,:et al., ) ) Respondents. ) i ) ) SAIFULLAH PARACHA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Vv. ) Civil Action No. 21-2567 (PLF) ) [UNDER SEAL] JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.,-etal., ) ). Respondents. ) eck MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Saifullah Paracha has filed a Second Motion for Immediate Ha

681 F.Supp.2d 53 (2010) Betty Ann NEWBY, Plaintiff, v. Barack H. OBAMA,[1] et al., Defendants. Civ. Action No. 08-1624 (EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 2, 2010. *54 Betty Ann Newby, Washington, DC, pro se. Wynne Patrick Kelly, U.S. Attorney's Office Washington, DC, for Defendan

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 6, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON NEWBY Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 09-08149 J. Robert Carter, Judge No. W2011-00210-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 13, 2012 A Shelby County Criminal Court Jury convicted the appellant, Brandon Newby, of carjacking

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced action inter alia are objections to Judge Rosenthal’s December 12, 2001 order of consolidation filed (1) by Plaintiffs John and Peggy Odam et al. (“the Odam Plaintiffs”) (instrument #53, supplemented by # 99) and (2) by Plaintiff Henry H. Steiner (“Steiner”)(# 75). Als

767 F.2d 1052 18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1335 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Newby Franklin LOVE, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Newby Franklin LOVE, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Robert Edward LEE, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Sue Robinson YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Robert Edward

Reversing. Hun Newby prosecutes this appeal from a four-year sentence given him upon conviction for the offense of having banded and confederated with others for the purpose of intimidating, disturbing, and injuring Douglas Roe. It is forcibly contended that the evidence introduced by the commonwealth was altogether insufficient under the provisions sections 241 and 242 of the Criminal Code of Practice to sustain the jury's verdict finding him guilty of the offense charged, and

Foster, J. The plaintiffs, who are the heirs at law of Nathan Newby, bring this action in ejectment to recover the S. E. £ of section 7, township 8, of range 20 E., being 160 acres of land lying in Jefferson county, Kansas. The defendant, Brownlee, sets up a superior title to the plaintiffs’, derived from a series of tax sales, and deeds made on such sales. The plaintiffs attack the defendant’s title as illegal, for the reason t

In August, 1883, the plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement "to run a gin at G. D. Newby's house, jointly." The defendants were to furnish an engine and fireman, and two hands to perform any work in connection with the ginning. The plaintiff was to furnish a house and gin and press, and three hands — fit up the gin and press and house at his own expense, but the defendants to furnish "the money, if the should need it, to run the whole business, at 8 per cent interest

Plaintiff appeals. This is an action to recover $600 for the wrongful conversion of a horse or for the wrongful conversion of the proceeds of the sale of the horse. Evidence was introduced by plaintiff tending to show that plaintiff and defendant bought a race horse together; that as a part of their contract with each other the plaintiff paid $100 on the purchase price of the horse, and the balance of the purchase money, to wit, $300, was to be paid out of the earnings of the ho

942 N.E.2d 125 (2011) P.K.E., Appellant, v. REVIEW BOARD OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and D.Z., Appellees. No. 93A02-1007-EX-799. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 11, 2011. *126 Patrick B. McEuen, Millbranth & Bush, Valparaiso, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of

255 F.Supp.2d 1301 (2003) Linda LAUBE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donal CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-T-957-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 28, 2003. *1302 Stephen B. Bright, Tamara H. Serwer, Marion D. Chartoff, Lisa Kung, Southern Center for Human Rights, Atlanta, GA, John A. Ru

NEWBY, Justice. **359 In this case we consider whether the trial court properly disqualified defendants' counsel under North Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 1.9(a). This rule balances an attorney's ethical duties of confidentiality and loyalty to a former client with a party's right to