Cases

J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD

Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (2024 NY Slip Op 01112) Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 01112 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department PITT-BURKE, J.

669 F.3d 240 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Omar MONTES-SALAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-41167. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 26, 2012. *243 Eileen K. Wilson (argued), Renata Ann Gowie, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed.

261 F.Supp.2d 61 (2003) DATA RESEARCH CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cesar REY HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 02-1253 (JAG), 02-1625UAG), 02-1758(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 30, 2003. *63 John F. Nevares, Smith & Nevares, San Juan, PR, Camilo K. Salas, Sessions, Fishman & Nathan LLP

786 F.Supp.2d 617 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Damien BANNISTER, Darrell Bannister, Christopher Hall, Cyril McCray, Eric Morris, Roger Patrick, James Ross, Derrick Tatum, Indio Tatum, Jawara Tatum, and Pedro Torres, Defendants. No. 10-CR-0053. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 8, 2011. *621 Loretta Lynch, U

Mr. Justice Ramírez Bages delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant, Juan Alicea Cruz, having been accused and convicted, through trial by jury, of murder in the first degree, for having caused the death of his concubine, Aida Delgado Núñez, whom he forced to drink what turned out to be *296strychnine, raises before this Court a series of assignme

932 F.2d 218 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 455, 1991 A.M.C.2017, 59 USLW 2687,118 Lab.Cas. P 35,475 Ernesto C. CRUZ, Victorino A. Domingo, Zaldy N. Bantilian,Leonardo J. Espiritu, Wilfredo D. Jequinto, Juan S.Terencio, Severiano S. Gasataya, Jr., Roberto A. Alejado,Vicente B. Solano, Cesar B. Del Rosario, Renato M. Santiago,Erlito R. Vistar, Richard B. Celoso, Cirilo R. Pacheco,Antonio T. Tani

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

Mr. Justice Wolf delivered the opinion of the Court. In accordance with the facts set np in the opinion of the judge which was made to form part of the judgment, the District Court of Ponce found the co-defendants Antonio Buseaglia, Guillermo Hernández, Alejandro Medina, and Can-dita Collazo guilty of the crime of the violation of Section 11 of Act No. 67 of 1934 (Session Laws, 458), as amended with respect to

CC-1999-969 1 En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Municipio de San Juan Peticionario Certiorari V. 2000 TSPR 183 Junta de Calidad Ambiental, Administración de Reglamentos y Permisos, Development Management Group, Inc. Recurridos Número del Caso: CC-1999-969 Abogados del Municipio de San Juan: Lcdo. Alberto Om

ALITO, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority affirms the decision of the district court holding that the plaintiffs in this case, foreign seamen on American-flag ships engaged in trade between foreign ports, were not covered by the minimum wage provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 206. The district court concluded: first, that American law did not apply under choice-of-law principles t