Cases

People v Arline (2022 NY Slip Op 01462) People v Arline 2022 NY Slip Op 01462 Decided on March 9, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

904 F.Supp. 43 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Israel SANTIAGO-LUGO (1), et al., Defendants. Crim. No. 95-029(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 29, 1995. *44 Bruce A. Pagel, Special Litigation Counsel Francisco Rebollo-Casalduc, Trial Attorney Guillermo Gil, U.S. Attorney, District of Pu

People v Austin (2022 NY Slip Op 01306) People v Austin 2022 NY Slip Op 01306 Decided on March 2, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Mark Mancini is a veteran police officer in Providence, Rhode Island (the City). Following an injury that he sustained while on duty, Mancini sued the City for discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. A district court may refer a pending motion to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.CivJP. 72(a); Loc. Rule 72(b). Any party adversely affected by the report and recommendation may file written objections within fourteen days of'being served with the magistrate judge’s report. Loc. Rule 72(d). See

431 F.Supp.2d 205 (2006) Jose A. AGUIRRE-RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. LITTLE CAESARS, et al., Defendant(s). No. CIV. 04-1361(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 10, 2006. *206 Juan R. Rodriguez, Rodriguez Lopez Law Office, Ponce, PR, for Plaintiffs. Edwin J. Seda-Fernandez, Adsuar, Muniz, Goyco &a;

525 F.3d 85 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Wilfredo Feliciano RODRIGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant. No. 06-2719. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 4, 2008. Decided May 13, 2008. *92 Linda Backiel, for appellant. German A. Rieckehoff, Assistant United States Attorney, with

239 F.Supp.2d 88 (2002) Gary S. WEBBER, Plaintiff v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., Defendant No. Civ. 02-63-B-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 3, 2003. *90 Arthur J. Greif, Julie D. Farr, Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, ME, for Plaintiff. Kate S. DeBevoise, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, M

ORDER CEREZO, District Judge. The Court has before it the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by the Enron defendants requesting dismissal of Civil Action 98-1519 (docket entry 1550), the opposition filed by plaintiff Integrand Assurance Company (docket entry 1611), and the Enron defendants’ reply (docket entry 1670). The dismissal request is based on the contention that the one year period for filing

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

157 F.3d 9 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carlos Ruben ACOSTA-COLON, Defendant, Appellant. No. 97-1170. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard May 6, 1998.Decided Oct. 5, 1998. Rachel Brill for appellant. Jose A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, wit

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

ESPINOSA, J., dissenting. "'Twill be recorded for a precedent, And many an error by the same example Will rush into the state." W. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, act IV, sc. i. I write this dissenting opinion not to address the concurring opinion of Justice Palmer, who continues to believe that State v. Santiago,

OPINION & ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro se plaintiff John Flanigan brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. (Dkt. No. 2: Compl.) P

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 97-1170 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS RUBEN ACOSTA-COLON, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITE

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Apelacién ORLANDO REYES ORTA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelante Superior de San Juan KLAN202500117 | Sobre: Vv. Despido Injustificado (Ley Num. 80 de 30 de mayo de 1976); THE CONDADO PLAZA Discrimen por Edad HILTON (Ley Num. 100 de 30 de junio de 1969); Procedimiento Apelada Sumario (Ley Num. 2 de 17 de octubre de 1961) Caso Num. SJ202 1CV07924 Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Juez Domin

FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <

815 F.2d 725 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1063 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael MORENO MORALES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Angel PEREZ CASILLAS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jaime QUILES HERNANDEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael TORRES MARRERO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STA

593 F.Supp. 794 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Angel PEREZ-CASILLAS, Jaime Quiles-Hernandez, Rafael Moreno-Morales, Rafael Torres-Marrero, Luis Reveron-Martinez, Juan Bruno-Gonzalez, Nelson Gonzalez-Perez, William Colon-Berrios, Jose Rios-Polanco, and Nazario Mateo-Espada, Defendants. Crim. No. 84-0070CC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 22,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ELEANOR ABRAHAM, ET AL., CASE NO. SX-11-CV-0000550 Plaintiffs, ACTION FOR: DAMAGES vs. ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, Defendant. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO: JUDGES AND MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEE J. ROHN, ESQ. JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ. CARL J. HARTMANN III, ESQ. IT/LAW CLERKS/LAW LIBRARY ORDER BOOK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 03, 2020 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated Fe