Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL STUDENT LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-1923 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintif

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL STUDENT LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-03473 (CJN) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The sole issue in this Freedom of Information Act case is whether the government’s search for re

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Jane Doe, an eleven-year-old transgender girl, seeks to use the girls’ restroom at Highland Elementary School. Highland will not permit her to do so. After an investigation, the Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) of the Department of Education (“DOE”) found that Highland’s policy im-permissibly discriminated against Jane on the basis of her se

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2476 (TJK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2007, Congress established the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (“PSLF” or “PS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2004 (EGS) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Penn School District; : Panther Valley School District; : The School District of Lancaster; : Greater Johnstown School District; : Wilkes-Barre Area School District; : Shenandoah Valley School District; : Jamella and Bryant Miller, parents of : K.M., a minor; Sheila Armstrong, : parent of S.A., minor; Tyesha : Strickland, parent of E.T., minor;

315 F.Supp.2d 15 (2004) CENTER FOR LAW AND EDUCATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-2414(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 26, 2004. *16 David Block Bergman, Ida Louise Bostian, Arnold & Porter, Washington, for Plaintiffs.

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court, in this pro se employment discrimination action filed by Margo Carris (“Plaintiff’) against First Student, Inc. (“Defendant”) are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 25); and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion to d

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 28 In the Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Service, &c., Appellant, v. Kerry Delaney, &c. et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. Shannon Stockwell, for appellant.

499 F.Supp.2d 775 (2007) ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and The U.S. Department of Air Force, Defendants. No. CIV.A. SA-98-CV-1011. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. August 10, 2007. *776 *777 David Frank in Barton, The

*427 OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: The appellees in these consolidated appeals challenge the preventive services requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”),

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE No. 22-55908 FUND, INC., a Wyoming Not-for- Profit Corporation; JEFFREY D.C. No. FUENTES; SANDRA GARCIA; 2:21-cv-08688- HOVHANNES SAPONGHIAN; DSF-PVC NORMA BRAMBILA; CALIFORNIA EDUCATORS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALBERTO CARVALHO, i

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025 No. 24-50149 ____________

Case: 24-50149 Document: 280 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025

MEMORANDUM DECISION AFTER TRIAL Charles Novack, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge On January 6, 2016, this court conducted a trial in the above adversary proceeding. All appearances were made on the record. Plaintiff Kevin Barrett (“Barrett”) seeks to discharge more than a quarter million dollars in student loan debt under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(8) on the ground that payment would constitute an undue hardship. The Uni

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge The instant action was initially filed in November 2012. The plaintiffs at that time included individuals as well as the Service Women's Action Network ("SWAN"). They challenged as unconstitutional "the official policy of the Department of Defense ('DoD') that categorically excludes ... women[ ] from assignments to units whose primary mission is to engage in direct ground combat." Compl.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OSU STUDENT ALLIANCE; WILLIAM  ROGERS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 10-35555 v.  DC No. 6:09 cv-6269 AA ED RAY; MARK MCCAMBRIDGE; LARRY ROPER; VINCENT OPINION MARTORELLO, Defendants-Appellees. 

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge IKUTA. OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: The complaint alleges that employees in Oregon State University’s Facilities Department gathered up the outdoor news-bins belonging to the Liberty, a conservative student monthly, and threw them in a heap by a dumpster in a storage yard. The employees acted pursuant

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case involves the alleged failure of Rhode Island to provide a free appropriate public education ("FAPE") to qualified students with disabilities, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). Specifically, K.L., through her parent L.L., and on behalf of a certified class of those similarly situated, asserts that Rhode Island violate