Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. In these consolidated cases, Plaintiff North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and certain other organizations and individual plaintiffs (“NAACP Plaintiffs”) in case L13CV658 move to preliminarily enjoin Defendants from implementing North Carolina’s voter photo-identification (“ID”) requirement in the March 2016 primary election. (Doc.

ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge Before the court is the “Emergency Motion to Enforce The Injunction” filed by the “Duke Intervenor” Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases. (Doc. 439.)1 Duke In-tervenors also seek an order to show cause why Defendants should not be held in contempt of court. (Doc. 440 at 20.) No other Plaintiff has joined in the motion or s

Loretta C. Biggs, United District Court Judge *397Before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. The first is brought by the Beaufort County Board of Elections, its Chairman, Secretary, Director, and a Member of the Board, each named in their official capacities (collectively "Beaufort Defendants"), (ECF No. 56); the second by the Cumberland County

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. In these related cases, Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 barring Defendants from implementing various provisions of North Carolina Session Law 2013-381 (“SL 2013-381”), an omnibus election-reform law.1 (Docs. 96 & 98 in case L13CV861; Docs. 10

345 S.W.3d 1 (2011) Esperanza ANDRADE, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Petitioner, v. NAACP OF AUSTIN, Nelson Linder, Sonia Santana, and David Van Os, Respondents. No. 09-0420. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued October 12, 2010. Delivered July 1, 2011. *3 Greg W. Abbott, Attorn

G. ALAN WALDROP, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority’s affirmance of this case is not consistent with our obligation to dismiss when the pleadings and jurisdictional evidence affirmatively negate jurisdiction. The pleadings and jurisdictional evidence demonstrate that (1) appellees do not have standing to assert them claims because they have not suffered any actual or imminent injury, an

TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 by Plaintiffs Indiana State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP") and League of Women Voters of Indiana ("League") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") (Filing No. 41 ). The Plaintiffs challenge the legality of Indiana Senate Enrolled A

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00076-CV Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Appellant <

Friday, July 01, 2011 Mr. Kristofer S. Monson Assistant Solicitor General P.O. Box 12548(MC 059) Austin, TX 78711-2548 Mr. James C. Harrington Texas Civil Rights Project 1405 Montopolis Dr. Austin, TX 78741-3438 RE: Case Number: 09-0420 Court of Appeals Number: 03-08-00076-CV Trial Court Number: D-1-GN-06-002147 Style: ESPERANZA ANDRADE, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS v. NAACP OF AUSTI

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Appellants, individual citizens eligible to vote in Georgia elections, former and future candidates for state office, and organizations whose members are citizens eligible to vote in Georgia elections, brought this action against the Georgia State Senate and its presiding officer, the Georgia House of Representatives and its Speaker of the House, and the Ge

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00076-CV Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Appellant v. NAACP of Austin, Nelson Linder, Sonia Santana and David Van Os, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-002147, HONORABLE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-22-00122-CV John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Style: Texas et al v Texas State Conference of the NAACP et al Date motion filed*: March 8, 2022

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00076-CV Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Appellant <

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0148p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TENNESSEE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL │ ASSOCIATION FOR

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00076-CV Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Appellant v. NAACP of Austin, Nelson Linder, Sonia Santana and David Van Os, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-002147, HONORA

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: At issue today is whether a state constitutional provision establishing standards for congressional redistricting that was approved by the people by initiative is contrary to the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution. Article I, Section 4 of the United States Constitution provides that the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for S

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3166 PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES; LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD; COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA; BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; BARRY M. SEASTEAD; MARLENE G. GUTIERREZ; AYNNE MARGARET PLEBAN POLINSKI; JOEL BENCAN; L

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1395 ___________________________ Arkansas State Conference NAACP; Arkansas Public Policy Panel Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment; Sarah Huckabee Sanders, in her officia

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0240p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; │ DEMOCRACY NASHVILLE-DEMOCRATIC COM