Cases

653 F.Supp.2d 747 (2009) WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC., and Hush Puppies Canada Footwear, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. WOLVERINE CANADA, INC., Richard Hunt, Mike Dyon, and Paul Dyon, Defendants. No. 1:07-cv-391. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 21, 2009. *751 Scott R. Carvo, Dean F. Pacific, Douglas A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MERCK & CO., INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-01738 (APM)

24-2312 Haran v. Orange Business Services, Inc. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: September 26, 2025 Decided: November 25, 2025 No. 24-2312 PATRICIA HARAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

402 F.Supp.2d 365 (2005) WOLVERINE PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AEROGLIDE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CIV.A.03-11372-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 7, 2005. *366 Claire S. Bishop, Foley & Lardner, Thomas I. Elkind, Foley & Lardner, LLP, Andrew K. Goldstein, Foley &

394 F.Supp.2d 299 (2005) WOLVERINE PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC. and Stanley Serosky, Plaintiffs, v. AEROGLIDE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 03-11372-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 19, 2005. *300 *301 *302 Claire S. Bishop

12 F.Supp.2d 1173 (1998) Robert M. ETIENNE, Plaintiff, v. WOLVERINE TUBE, INC., Defendant. No. 98-2010-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 2, 1998. *1174 *1175 *1176 Gregory M. Dennis, Richard W. Noble, The Noble Group, P.C., Brendan J. Donel

535 U.S. 81 (2002) RAGSDALE et al. v. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. No. 00-6029. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 7, 2002. Decided March 19, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *82 *83 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the

OPINION McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jerry Romans, a Caucasian male, alleges that Defendant Michigan Department of Human Services violated Title VII by discriminating against him based on his race. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) by interfering with his FMLA-leave rights and retaliating ag

590 N.W.2d 586 (1998) 233 Mich. App. 238 COUNTY OF ALCONA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WOLVERINE ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTION, INC., Defendant-Appellant. County of Alpena, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wolverine Environmental Production, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Docket Nos. 196934, 199408. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted September 1, 1998, at Lansi

Case: 12-40165 Document: 00512366420 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 9, 2013 No. 12-40165 Lyle W. Cay

619 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2009) Raymond H. PIERSON, III, Plaintiff, and Joanne R. Werntz, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Erik Lieberman, as personal representative of the Estate of Phillip G. Spiegel; Roger Murbach; Steven Appleblatt; Frank Bone; William Bott; Thomas Csencsitz; J. Dean Cole; John Hillenmeyer; J. David Moser; N. Donald Diebel; Rory Evans; Manuel J. Galceran; Hedrick J. Rivero; C. Gordon Wolfram;

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORACLE USA, INC.; ORACLE No. 22-15188 AMERICA, INC.; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00106- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LRH-VCF v. RIMINI STREET, INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0214p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DOROTHY BIVENS, │ Plaintiff-Appel

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: The Nursing Center of Buckingham and Hampden, Inc. (“NCBH”), appeals from an adverse decision of the District Court. The District Court affirmed the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) that NCBH’s 1984 agreement to purchase a nursing home in P

The industry's opposition to using the WAC also manifested itself as a First Amendment argument. See id. at 20,743 -48. The challengers argued that the WAC Disclosure Rule was compelled speech that vio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2022 Term FILED _______________ June 9, 2022 No. 20-1042 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK _______________

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0011p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC.; ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES │ AD

At bottom, the case involves an employer that met its statutory obligations and an employee who did not meet his employment *861obligations. The employer is entitled to summary judgment. A. The Summary Judgment Record The facts are shown by the parties' summary judgment evidence. The summary judgment evidence includes

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 13, 2020 Decided June 16, 2020 No. 19-5222 MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., APPELLEES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colu

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE J. HAZEL, District Judge. This dispute arose after one of Plaintiffs’ employees resigned, started a competing business, and hired several of Plaintiffs’ employees. The former employers, Plaintiffs MedServ International, Inc., Endo-Surg Medical, Inc., and EndoCure Technologies, Inc. have brought this action against Defendants EndoMaster Medical, Inc., Tommy Leung, Paul