Cases

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

540 U.S. 912 MYRICKv.NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. No. 03-5495. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir. 2 Certiorari denied.

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, he

Malerba v New York City Tr. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 04344) Malerba v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 04344 Decided on August 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department RODRIGUEZ, J. Published by

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered October 1, 2013, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. Defendant and a codefendant, Jordan Renak, were charged in a five-count indictment with three counts of robbery in the first degree, one count of robbery in the second degree and one count o

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered October 1, 2013, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree. Defendant and a codefendant, Jordan Renak, were charged in a five-count indictment with three counts of robbery in the first degree, one count of robbery in the second degree and one count o

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION In this consolidated multi-district litigation (“MDL”), plaintiffs seek relief from contamination, or threatened contamina*584tion, of groundwater from various defendants’ use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and/or ter

OPINION CHIN, District Judge. In this case, a group of Hispanic employees sue the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Port Authority”) alleging discrimination on the basis of national origin, race, and ethnicity in the Port Authority’s appointments and promotions practices. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs move for sanctions under Rule 37 of the

JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge: This appeal concerns two novel aspects of trial procedure: (1) the use of the same jury to try sequentially two unrelated civil cases, and (2) the use of court employees to act as standby counsel for a pro se litigant. These matters come before us on an appeal by Johnathan Johnson from the August 31, 1995, judgment of the United St

612 F.3d 97 (2010) NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Verizon Wireless, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Sprint Spectrum L.P., and Omnipoint Communications, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN and Town Board of the Town of Clarkstown, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Docket Nos. 09-1546-cv, 09-1860-cv. <

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 23, *6301990, as, upon renewal (erroneously designated as reargument), adhered to the original determination denying the petition. Ordered that the order is affirmed ins

603 F.Supp.2d 715 (2009) NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Spring Spectrum, L.P., and Omnipoint Communications, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN, and The Town Board of the Town of Clarkstown, Defendants. No. 07 Civ 7637(WGY). United States District Court, S.D. New York.

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated March 7, 1989, which granted the petition. *592Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the proceeding is dismissed. The record indicates th

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated August 16, 1988, as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the second cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of

183 F.Supp.2d 664 (2002) Kenneth CURTIN, Plaintiff, v. The PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK and New Jersey and Delta Airlines, Inc., Defendants. No. 01 CIV 445(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 8, 2002. *665 Kenneth Bornstein, Esq., Bornstein & Emanuel, P.C., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff.

472 S.E.2d 431 (1996) 220 Ga. App. 520 MYRICK et al. v. STEPHANOS et al. No. A95A1928. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 1996. *433 Freeman & Hawkins, Warner S. Fox, Michael J. Goldman, Atlanta, for appellants. Dwyer & White, J. Matthew Dwyer, Jr., Carmen Smith, Anne W. Sapp, Atlanta, fo

USCA11 Case: 22-11359 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 07/12/2024 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11359 ____________________ CHARLES JOHNSON, JR.,

Crew III, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered April 13, 1992, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. In the late evening of November 7, 1990, City of Albany Police Detective Charles Krikorian received a telepho

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, etc., the defendant Village of Southampton (hereinafter the village) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated February 2, 1987, which (1) denied its motion, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), to dismiss all of the causes of action in the complaint, except the cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death, a