Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Myra Chung”
907 P.2d 101 (1995) 80 Hawai`i 150 Myra P. SMITH, Respondent-Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai`i, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Petitioner-Appellee, Employer/Self-Insured. No. 17215. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. November 6, 1995. Reconsideration Denied November 22, 1995. Joseph P.H. Ahuna Jr., on the briefs, Kaneohe,
People v. Bentopublic domain
Opinion VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.— Relevant Procedural Background On September 9, 1996, an amended information was filed against appellants Anthony Temell Johnson and Richard Allen Bento. Count 1 charged appellants with first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.) Count 2 charged appellants with attempted willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder. (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187.) Counts 1 and 2 also a
Islami v. Covenant Medical Center, Inc.public domain
822 F.Supp. 1361 (1992) Mohammad ISLAMI, M.D., Plaintiff, v. COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Timothy Wilson, Richard D. Waldorf, and James F. Connell, Jr., Defendants. No. C 90-2076. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, E.D. December 22, 1992. *1362 *1363 Nick Critelli, Nick Critelli Associ
State v. Kimpublic domain
519 P.2d 1241 (1974) STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thelma M. KIM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5477. Supreme Court of Hawaii. March 7, 1974. *1242 Donald K. Tsukiyama, Public Defender, Honolulu, for defendant-appellant. Corrine H. Lee, Deputy Pros. Atty. (Barry Chung, Pros. Atty., of counsel), for the State. B
Lockyer v. City and County of San Franciscopublic domain
17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225 (2004) 95 P.3d 459 33 Cal.4th 1055 Bill LOCKYER, as Attorney General, etc., Petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents. Barbara Lewis et al., Petitioners, v. Nancy Alfaro, as County Clerk, etc., Respondent. Nos. S122923, S122865. Supreme Court of California. August 12, 2004.<
Grand Street Artists v. General Electric Co.public domain
28 F.Supp.2d 291 (1998) GRAND STREET ARTISTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Parker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 96-3774 (HAA). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 18, 1998. *292 Philip Elberg, Medvin & Elber
07/01/2002 Case Announcementspublic domain
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
In Re Marriage Casespublic domain
43 Cal.4th 757 (2008) In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.][1] No. S147999. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 2008. *765 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Timothy Donald Chandler, Christopher R. Stovall, Dale Schowengerdt; Advocates for Faith and Freedom, Robert Henry Tyler; Law Offices of Terr
In Re Marriage Casespublic domain
49 Cal.Rptr.3d 675 (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 873 In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals[*]]. Nos. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three. October 5, 2006. *680 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Chris
Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. Castlepublic domain
LEVINSON, Justice. These consolidated appeals oblige us to revisit Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Lyman, 68 Haw. 56, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), and Takabuki v. Housing Finance and Development Corp., 72 Haw. 466, 822 P.2d 955 (1991), in order to address the question whether the Hawai'i Land Reform Act, Hawai'i Revised S