Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Elizabeth Murray as Personal Representative of the Estate of Minnie H. Murray and Elizabeth Stylesetters, Appellants, v. The Estate of William E. Murray, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2018-001680 Appeal from Charleston County Jennifer B. McCoy, Circuit Court Judge Tamara C. Curry, Probate Court Judge Opinion No. 5890 Heard April 15, 2021 – Filed January 19, 2022

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1230-14 CHAD WILLIAM MURRAY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS HILL COUNTY H ERVEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which K EL

FILED April 5, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

FILED May 2, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ September 19, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A18D0071. WILLIAM TERRENCE MURRAY v. THE STATE. After a jury convicted William Murray of several offenses, he filed a motion for a new trial. In August 2017, the trial court granted Murray’s motion on various grounds as to all of his convictions. Althoug

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00356-CR CHAD WILLIAM MURRAY, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas

FILE COPY No. 07-13-00356-CR Chad William Murray § From the 66th District Court Appellant of Hill County § v. November 9, 2015 § The State of Texas

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 17, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A15E0027. MURRAY v. THE STATE. On April 17, William Murray filed and emergency motion seeking an appeal of the trial court’s October 17, 2014 order denying his motion for an out-of-time appeal. For the following reasons, we dismiss the motion. This C

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ December 04, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A15D0131. WILLIAM T. MURRAY v. STATE. William Murray seeks to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for an out of time appeal. An order denying a motion for an out of time appeal, however, is a directly appealable order. See, e.g., Lunsford v. St

OPINION BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice. Chad William Murray appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. He raises four issues, but we address only one for it is dispositive. 1 That issue involves the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We find the evidence legally insuffici

FILED January 10, 2025 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WE

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 15 2019, 8:58 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res jud

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 15 2019, 9:04 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 242 KA 09-02146 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER WILLIAM F. MURRAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

WORKMAN, Chief Justice: This ease is before the Court upon the appeal of the Petitioner William B. Murray from his jury convictions of first degree murder without mercy and concealment of a deceased human body. The Petitioner was sentenced to life without mercy for his first degree murder conviction and not less than one nor more than five years for his concealment of a deceased h

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 764 CA 11-01856 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. WILLIAM M. MURRAY, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT, V ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK AND NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. COLLINS & COLLINS, LLC, BUFFALO (MICHAEL P. QUINN, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT. MACDONALD & HAFNER

DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge *228INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William Murray commenced this action by filing a pro se complaint on July 11, 2016, in the Northern District of New York. (Dkt. # 1.) Plaintiff asserted claims under federal law against fifteen individual defendants, arising out of plaintiff's e

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William A. Murray brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of New York, the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), and a number of individual defendants, most of whom are or were employed by DOCS at the time of the relevant events, alleging, that the defendan

THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 33A APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 May 3, 2023 HOPEFUL, a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Kulas f/k/a Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola; HOPEFUL LTD., a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, Will