Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND RELATED RELIEF Mark X. Mullin, United States Bankruptcy Judge On April 3, 4,10, and 11, 2017, the Court held a trial on Plaintiff Victor Bernal’s specific performance cause of action against DK8 LLC (“DK8”) and HBT Land, LLC (“HBT Land”), as well as those portions of Bernal’s breach-of-contract and declaratory-judgment causes of action

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00178-CV __________________ L&S PRO-LINE, LLC AND LEE BURKETT, Appellants V. GARRETT GAGLIANO, SNOOK HOLDINGS, LLC, AND TACTICAL AUTOMATION, INC., Appellees _____________

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

RICHRD W. STORY, United States District Judge At its core, this case presents the following question: when a client retains an attorney but later becomes dissatisfied with the quality or cost of the attorney's work, is the client, nevertheless, obligated to pay the attorney's fees and costs? In this case, Plaintiff Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC ("Meunier"), a law firm,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge. Count One of the Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Complaint sets forth an allegation of an overarching conspiracy on the part of the Defendants, who are private equity firms, “to allocate the market for and artificially fix, maintain, or stabilize prices of securities in club LB Os in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.” Plaintiffs are

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–0950 Filed February 7, 2020 HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellee, vs. STEVE J. RETTERATH, Appellant, vs. JASON RETTERATH and ANNIE RETTERATH, Intervenors-Appellants, and PATRICK BOYLE, MAURICE HYDE, CHRISTINE MARCHAND, LESLIE HANSEN, CHAD KUHLERS, WALTER WENDLAND, MATTHEW DRISCOLL, EDWARD HATTEN, ROBERT SIERACKI, KEITH EASTMAN, STEPHEN EASTMAN, BARNEY RETTER

514 F.Supp.2d 934 (2007) SPECTRUM CREATIONS, L.P., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN KINDER INTERNATIONAL, LLC & The Uttermost Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-05-CV-750-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. April 5, 2007. *935 Mark L. Greenwald, The Law Offices of Mark Louis Greenwald, Robert Loye M

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2022 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION No. 20-16068 OF AMERICA, INC.; PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00236-WHO DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California; PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC.; PLANNED

23-7612 Gimpel v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2024 (Argued: December 5, 2024 Decided: September 29, 2025) Docket No. 23-7612 SALAMON GIMPEL, ROSEWOOD FUNERAL HOME, Lead Plaintiffs–Appellants,

AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS McMahon, C.J.: The issue raised by this garden-variety securities fraud complaint is simple: is an offering document that fully discloses all substantive investment risks materially misleading if it fails to disclose that a government agency, in a country very different than ours, met with the issuer to underscore the issuer’s oblig

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Michael G. Williamson, United States Bankruptcy Judge In 2006, Edgar Jannotta, as a director of Trans Healthcare, Inc. (“THI”) approved the sale of Trans Health Management, Inc. (“THMI”), THI’s subsidiary at the time, to the Debtor for $100,000. At the same time, THI’s parent company, THI Holdings, sold THI’s sister company, THI of Baltimore, Inc. (“THI-Balt

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH C. BAMFORD and YOUNG MIN BAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2019-0005-JTL PENFOLD, L.P.; DELAWARE VALLEY ) REGIONAL CENTER, LLC; WEST 36TH, INC.; ) JOSEPH MANHEIM; and REATH & CO., LLC; ) )

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is a trademark infringement case between two global fashion compa*215nies. On May 6, 2009, Gucci America, Inc. (“Gucci”) filed a complaint against Guess?, Inc. (“Guess”), Marc Fisher Footwear LLC (“MFF”), the Max Leather Group/Cipri

FILED Appellate Case: 19-4130 Document: 010110703167 United States CourtPage: Date Filed: 06/29/2022 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit June 29, 2022

443 F.Supp.2d 474 (2006) Douglas GILSTRAP and Myron Tataryn, each on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. RADIANZ LTD., Radianz Americas, Inc., Reuters Limited, Blaxmill (Six) Limited, Reuters C LLC, Reuters America LLC, and British Telecommunications plc, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 7947(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 26, 200

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE FREDERICK HSU LIVING TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12108-VCL ) OAK HILL CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., ) OAK HILL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ) PARTNERS III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) NATIONAL TREASURY ) EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 25-0381 (AB

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this trademark infringement action, Plaintiff Gucci America, Inc. (“Gucci”) seeks a protective order against the disclosure of the communications of its former in-house counsel Jonathan Moss (“Moss”), and non-party Guccio Gucci S.p.A.’s (“GG”) in-house intellectual property counse

653 F.Supp.2d 184 (2009) DISABILITY ADVOCATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. David A. PATERSON, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Michael F. Hogan, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, the New York State Department of Health, and the New York State Office of Mental Health, De