Cases

638 F.Supp.2d 826 (2009) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey A. WEICKERT, et al., Defendant. Case No. 3:09 CV 288. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. July 2, 2009. James S. Wertheim, Rose Marie L. Fiore, McGlinchey Stafford, Cleveland, OH, Anthony Rollo, McGlinchey Stafford, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff.

277 B.R. 251 (2002) In re Lawrence D. GOLDBERG, Debtor. Dwayne M. Murray, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Mae M. Stacy Trust and F. Eugene Richardson, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 94-10885. Adversary No. 95-1020. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana. May 1, 2002. *252 *253 Dale R. Baringer,

813 So.2d 467 (2002) Gloria B. MARTELLO v. CITY OF FERRIDAY and Owen and White, Inc. No. 01-1240. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 6, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 1, 2002. *471 Charles S. Norris, Jr., Vidalia, LA, Attorney for the Class of Plaintiffs/Appellees Gloria Martello, Class Representative

931 So.2d 506 (2006) REGIONS BANK v. Carroll KOUNTZ, et al. No. 2005-1106. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 31, 2006. *508 Jeffrey Ackermann, Durio, McGoffin, Stagg and Ackermann, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Regions Bank. James H. Gibson, Allen & Gooch, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee,

268 B.R. 759 (2001) In re SUPERNATURAL FOODS, LLC, Debtor. Dwayne Murray, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of Supernatural Foods, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Franke-Misal Technologies Group, LLC, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-10403. Adversary No. 01-1014. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana. October 17, 2001. *760 <

JENNIFER W. ELROD, Circuit Judge, with whom JERRY E. SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting: Today the court concludes that an Act of Congress is not really an Act of Congress. In doing so, it holds that a non-self-executing treaty,1 the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

24 So.3d 891 (2009) John MILLER v. CRESCENT CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER. No. 2008-CA-1347. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 28, 2009. *892 Ivan A. Orihuela, Riguer Silva, LLC, Kenner, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Thomas C. Cowan, J. Michael Daly, Jr., Cowan & Lemmon, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant/

684 N.W.2d 800 (2004) 471 Mich. 608 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION & Upper Peninsula Wildlife Council, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY & Empire Iron Mining Partnership, Defendants-Appellants, and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and Russell J. Harding, Director Of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 121890. Cale

TOBIAS, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, and assigns reasons. hi respectfully concur in the majority’s ruling that the peremptory exception of prescription filed by the defendant/appel-lee, Crescent City Health Services (“Crescent City”), was properly sustained by the trial court. I state my reasoning infra. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s rul

703 So.2d 709 (1997) Patrick A. DELANEY v. WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK. Nos. 96-CA-2144, 97-CA-0254. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 12, 1997. Opinion Denying Rehearing December 15, 1997. *712 Nesser, King & LeBlanc, Patricia A. Krebs, J. Grant Coleman, Timothy S. Madden, New Orleans, for Pla

549 So.2d 891 (1989) STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF the CITY OF TALLULAH, Defendants/Appellees, Louis Buckner, Intervenor/Appellant. No. 20,852-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 27, 1989. Rehearing Denied October 26, 1989. *892 William J. Gu

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The question before us is whether the United States is liable under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b) (1982), for attorneys’ fees incurred by Dr. Bhartur Premachandra in his suit against the Veterans Administration based on an alleged constitutional violation. As we find no basis in the language of the statutes or legislative histo

ELLIS, Judge. This is a suit by plaintiff to evict the defendant from the property described as Lot No. 13 of Sq. No. 45 in South Baton Rouge and which is located on East Johnson Street. In this suit, plaintiff alleges her ownership of this property by virtue of notarial act of sale from her sister, Mattie Murray, of the latter’s undivided one-half interest, passed before H. Alva Brumfield, Notary, on the 8th day of February

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Consolidated Nos. 19-231L / 19-258L (Filed: February 6, 2020) ) Keywords: Motion to Dismiss; RCFC STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. ) 12(b)(6); RCFC 12(b)(1); Takings ) Clause; Fifth Amendment; Flooding; Plaintiffs, ) Standing

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. |, This is an expropriation suit. The Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College (“LSU”) commenced this suit against Dixie Brewing Company, Inc. (“Dixie”), seeking to expropriate a parcel of property owned by Dixie. The purpose for the expropriation was to facilitate the development and construction of LSU’s new University Medical Center (“UMC”)

826 F.2d 1383 FOREMOST GUARANTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.COMMUNITY SAVINGS & LOAN, INC., a Maryland Association,Defendant-Appellant,andPhiladelphia Savings Fund Society; Epic Mortgage, Inc., aDelaware Corporation; Dominion Federal Savings & LoanAssociation, a federal savings and loan association; FirstNational Bank of Maryland, a national banking corporation;Silverado Banking Savings and Loan

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 59), filed by Defendant Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College (“LSU”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiff Anthony Minnis’s (“Minnis”) claims against it, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Min-nis oppo

ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ “Joint Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6).”1 Having considered the motion, the memoranda in support, the memoranda in opposition, the statements at oral argument, the Petition, and the applicable law, the Court will grant the motion with respect to each of

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 05-266V Filed: December 29, 2014 To Be Published **************************** BOB and CARMEL MOONEY, parents * of E.L.M., a minor child, * Autism; Attorney Fees and Costs; Petitioners, *

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS