Cases

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2014 ME 11 Docket: Pen-12-582 Argued: June 12, 2013 Decided: January 30, 2014 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., ALEXANDER, SILVER, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. Concurrence: SAUFLEY, C.J. Dissent: MEAD, J. JOHN DOE et al.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0029p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JOHN DOE, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 53148 and 53137 In the Interest of: ) John Doe I and John Doe II, ) Children Under Eighteen (18) Years of Age. ) --------------------------------------------------- ) JANE DOE, ) ) Petitioner-Respondent,

05/27/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 9, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN CALVIN MURRAY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Robertson County No. 2012-CR-206 Jill Bartee Ayers, Judge ___________________________________

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6026 JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina; FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01; SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02; KIMBERLY ROBB, District Attorney, District 03A;

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge. On November 29, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The time within which to file objections expired on December 17, 2012, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that f

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHEAL W. BUCKNER et al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-567 (TJK) PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs allege they are the trustees of the United Mine Workers of America

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 22-P-102 Appeals Court PHILIP A. CORMIER & anoth

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00165-CV John Murray, Appellant v.

[Cite as State v. Murray, 2023-Ohio-1628.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2022-T-0075 2022-T-0076 Plaintiff-Appellee, - vs - Criminal Appeals from the

[Cite as Morton v. Murray, 2018-Ohio-5178.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 106759 J. ALEX MORTON PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v

OPINION Opinion by: PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ, Justice. In response to a complaint that Appellee John Faircloth was interfering with others’ right to fish, Appellant Kenneth Mark Dorrough, a deputy game warden, entered Faircloth’s lakefront property. He saw Appellee Helen Bowen, Faircloth’s wife, questioned her briefly, and then questioned Faircloth. After a he

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 601 U. S. Part 1 Pages 23–41 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 8, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1527 Doc: 41 Filed: 07/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 48 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1527 JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 6; JANE DOE 1; JANE DOE 2; JANE DOE 3; JANE DOE 4; JANE DOE 5, Plaintiffs -

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a “Complaint Seeking Documents Pursuant to Privacy Act” against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ECF No. 1. His grounds for jurisdiction are the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5' U.S.C § 552.

OPINION CORNISH, Bankruptcy Judge. In these two substantively similar cases, the Chapter 7 trustees appeal the bankruptcy court’s orders overruling their objections to exemptions claimed by the debtors. The debtors claimed as exempt their state and federal tax refunds attributable to the earned income tax credit under a Kansas bankruptcy-only exemption statute. The trustees objected, arguing primarily that t

[Cite as Murray v. Carano, 2017-Ohio-8235.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT O. JOSEPH MURRAY, EXECUTOR : JUDGES: OF ESTATE OF JOSEPH A. : CARANO, DECEASED : : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant :

[Cite as State v. Murray, 2017-Ohio-949.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 16AP-16 (C.P.C. No. 14CR-6044) v. :

OPINION Irene Rios, Justice Introduction Alen John Murray was convicted by a jury of compelling prostitution. To support this conviction, the State introduced into evidence pictures, private messages, and other electronic data from a Faeebook account assigned to Murray. On appeal, Murray contends: (1) the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause to search

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and STEPHENS, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Reggie W. MURRAY II Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling)